The
Changing Nature(s) of Land:
Property, Peasants and Agricultural Production in a Global World
This class is part of an
Andrew H. Mellon Sawyer Seminar that will run through 2007-2008. Class
meetings
will alternate between the traditional-style seminar and working group
meetings
open to the public. The theme for the seminar generally is the way in
which
contemporary development has been shaped by political and cultural
economies of
the land – or, the way in which people, communities and societies have
negotiated access to, rights over, and use of the land. This semester,
we will
specifically focus on property and agrarian politics (see below). We
will read
classic and contemporary literature in: political economy, property
theory,
critical Development Studies, legal geography and anthropology, social
movement
studies, and agrarian studies. During working group meetings, an
invited guest
will present a paper for discussion.
Our two themes this semester
are, in more detail:
1) Power
and Property Rights: 21st Century Land Reforms. Perhaps the most important element of the
changing nature of land is the way in which notions and norms of
property have
been re-worked. The late
twentieth century witnessed
the largest re-distribution of land titles in modern history with the
de-collectivization of common property and state farms in Eastern
Europe, China
and Mexico. The push to privatize
property echoes the emphasis on individual rights, juridical equality,
and
state withdrawal that characterizes neo-liberal globalization more
broadly and
has important consequences for national
development, household provisioning, and the construction of political
subjects.
2) Locating
Agrarian Publics: Trans-National Peasant Movements and Mobilization. At the same time, new grassroots
actors in countries as diverse as Brazil, India, and South Africa have
mobilized to demand radical changes in their relationship to property
and the
land. Rural workers, small farmers,
squatters, sharecroppers, and even the urban poor have risen to the
forefront
of massive counter-globalization struggles demanding land-to-the-tiller
reforms
reminiscent of the 1960s. Constituted in
the interstices of colonial and post-colonial development policies,
these
actors are demanding alternative property regimes, new mechanisms of
food
sovereignty, and sustainable forms of development.
Across different countries and
regions, we will work through
spatial and historical comparisons, asking questions such as: what relationships exist between the property
enclosures of 18 century England and the mass de-collectivization
of state property in Eastern Europe over the past twenty years? Why have populist calls for a return to the
land been present in every century and every region of this modern
industrial
age? What threads run through
Progressive Era concerns over Pure Food in the United States and heated
calls
for organic, sustainable, and slow food production and consumption
today? How do gender, class, and customary
laws
interact with the social and economic forces of globalization to create
new
geographies of power and exclusion?
Mechanics:
1) The layout of
the seminar:
The seminar will be divided
into three different types of
meetings: class meetings, during which we will read theoretical
material
pertaining to the topic of property and mobilization; working group
meetings,
during which we will focus on one or two papers presented by local
faculty and
students; and, finally, two mini-conferences, one on property and one
on
mobilization.
For the working group meetings,
papers will be distributed
electronically at least one week prior to the meeting. They will also
be
available in hard copy at UCIS, the University Center for International
Studies. Papers for each meeting will usually include one
work-in-progress written
by a seminar participant. The meetings will be opened by a graduate
student
enrolled in the class who will present a prepared set of comments,
after which
general questions and comments will be addressed to the author. The
author will
have a chance to respond after at least one half hour has passed.
The intensive two-day workshops
will cap the working group
meetings on each theme. Speakers will include outside invited guests as
well as
internal seminar participants. Speakers will give public presentations
and
address issues raised by seminar participants during the working group
meetings.
1)
POWER AND PROPERTY RIGHTS: 21ST
CENTURY LAND REFORMS
Readings:
Rose, Carol M. (1994) Property
and Persuasion: Essays on the History, Theory and Rhetoric of Ownership
(Westview Press), Introduction and part one, pp. 1 – 46. (complete book
available at: http://www.law.yale.edu/documents/pdf/Property_and_Persuasion_Carol_M_Rose.pdf)
Note: there is a fair bit of
reading for next week because we
didn’t want to overload here – it might be a good idea to get started!
Optional Reading:
2. August 28 (CLASS): From Propriety
to Property to
Theft: Theoretical Perspectives
Readings:
Thompson, E.P (1993)
“Custom,
Law, and Common Right” in Customs
in Common: Studies in Traditional
Popular Culture (New York: The New Press, 1993), 97-184.
Proudhon, Pierre Joseph.
What
is Property? An Inquiry into the Principle of Right and of
Government
(Chapter Three on "Labor as the Efficient Cause of the Domain of
Property").
MacPherson,
C.B. 1983. Property: Mainstream &
Critical Positions. Toronto:
University of Toronto Press.
Chapter 2
“John Locke: Of Property” pp. 15-27; Chapter 3 “Discourse on the Origin and Foundation of
Inequality,
extract from Rousseau on “The Origin of Inequality” reprinted, 29-37; Chapter
4
“Jeremy Bentham: Security and Equity of Property” pp. 39-58; Chapter
5
“Karl Marx: Bourgeois Property and Capitalist Accumulation” pp. 59-74.
Rose,
Carol M. (1994) Property and Persuasion:
Essays on the History, Theory and Rhetoric of Ownership
(Westview
Press),
part two, pp. 47-103. (Online)
Optional reading:
Locke, John. Second Treatise on Government, Chapter 5: Of Property. (Online)
Blomley, Nicholas (2007) “Making
private property: enclosure, common right and the work of hedges,” Rural History 18(1): 1-21
(Available at: http://www.sfu.ca/geography/people/faculty/Faculty_sites/NickBlomley/documents/books/NB%20rural%20history.pdf)
Engels, Friedrich. The Origins
of the Family, Private Property
and the State. Selections (complete text online at:
http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1884/origin-family/index.htm)
3. September 4
(CLASS): From Propriety to Property to
Theft: Colonial Encounters
Readings:
Macpherson, C.B.
(1975) “Capitalism
and the Changing Concept of Property” in H.E. Hallam
et al,
eds. Feudalism, Capitalism and Beyond. Canberra:
ANU Press, pp. 105-124.
Patricia Seed, Ceremonies
of
Possession in Europe’s
Conquest of the New World, 1492-1640 (Cambridge: Cambridge
University
Press, 1995), 1-40
Cole Harris, “How
Did Colonialism
Dispossess? Comments from an Edge of Empire”
(2004)
94 Annals of the Association of American
Geographers 165-182
Guha, Ranajit. (1996) A Rule
of Property: An Essay on the Idea of Permanent Settlement.
Durham:
Duke
University Press. Introduction.
4. September 11 (WG): Joseph Bryan
5. September 18 (CLASS): On the Various
Tragedies of
Property
Discussants: Brenda, Sindhu and
Zoe
Readings (commons I):
Hardin, Garrett. 1968
. “The
Tragedy of the Commons” Science 162: 1243-1248.
Ostrom, Elinor. 1991. Governing
the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective. Chapter1
“Reflections on the
Commons” pp 1-28
Lu, Flora (2006) "The Commons in an Amazonian Context,"
in Social Analysis 50(3):
187-194.
Rose, Carol M. (1994) Property
and Persuasion: Essays on the History, Theory and Rhetoric of Ownership
(Westview Press), part three, pp. 103-197.
Michael A. Heller,
“The
Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in Transition from Marx to
Markets”
(1998) 111 Harv. L. Rev. 621.
Readings (commons II):
Hardt, Michael (n.d.) Common
Property (at: http://www.k3000.ch/becreative/texts/text_4.html)
Mitchell, Don and
Lynn A. Staeheli, (2005) “Turning
Social Relations into Space: Property,
Law and the
Plaza
of Sante
Fe, New Mexico” 30 Landscape
Research 361-378.
Optional Readings:
Ostrom, Elinor (2003)
“How Types of Goods and Property Rights Jointly Affect Collective
Action,” Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol.
15, No. 3, 239-270.
Agarwal, Arun and
Elinor Ostrom (2001) “Collective
Action, Property Rights, and Decentralization in Resource Use in India and Nepal” Politics and Society
29(4): 485-514 (available online at:
http://pas.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/29/4/485.pdf)
Turner, Matthew D.
(1999) “Conflict, Environmental Change, and Social Institutions in
Dryland
Africa: Limitations of the Community Resource Management Approach” Society
& Natural Resources 12: 643-657.
Singer, Joseph. 2000. Entitlement:
The Paradoxes of Property. New Haven: Yale University Press. 1-18.
8. October 5 (WG): David Salisbury (note new day and time!
THIS IS FRIDAY, 3:30 - 5:00)
9.
October 9 (CLASS) Gendering Property
Discussants: Holly, Cara and
Tara
Readings:
Agarwal, Bina. 1994. A
Field of One’s Own: Gender and Land Rights in South Asia. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press. Chapter 1: Land Rights for Women:
Making the
Case. Chapter 2: Conceptualizing Gender Relations.
Shahra Razavi. 2003.
Special Issue: Agrarian Change, Gender
and Land Rights Journal of
Agrarian
Change 3 (1 & 2).
Fortmann, Louise,
Camille Antinori and Nontokozo Nabane. 1997. “Fruits of their Labors:
Gender,
Property Rights and Tree Planting in Two Zimbabwe Villages” Rural
Sociology (available at:
http://cnr.berkeley.edu/fortmann/FruitsoftheirLabors.pdf)
Deere, C.D. and C. R.
Doss. 2006. “The Gender Asset Gap: What do We Know
and Why Does it
Matter?” Feminist
Economics 12 (1-2): 1-50.
Optional Readings:
Hamilton, Sarah. 2002.
“Neoliberalism, Gender and Property Rights in Rural Mexico.” Latin
American
Research Review 37 (1): 119-143.
Dore, Elizabeth. 2000. “Property, Households, and Public Regulation of Domestic Life: Diriomo, Nicaragua, 1840-1900” in Elizabeth Dore and Maxine Molyneux (eds) Hidden Histories of Gender and the State in Latin America. Durham, NC: Duke University Press: 147-171.
10. October 16 (CLASS): Politics, Privatization
and (Property)
Rights - Eminent Domain in the United States
Discussants: Liz
H., Sara S., Scarlet and Cindy
Readings:
Harvey, David (2003) The New
Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (This reading is
a selection)
Please skim
(read, but read lightly):
The United
States Supreme Court Opinion and Decision on New London vs. Kelo
(2005)
The Amicus
Brief filed by Jane Jacobs, Urban Sociologist, in support of
Petitioners (Kelo et al.)
The Amicus
Brief filed by the NAACP, the AARP et al., in support of Petitioners
The Amicus
Brief filed by the CATO Institute and Richard Epstein, in support
of Petitioners
Optional reading
Kate Green,
“Citizens and Squatters: Under the Surfaces of Land Law” in Susan
Bright and
John Dewar, editors, Land Law: Themes and
Perspectives (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
McCarthy, James (2001) “Environmental
Enclosures and the State of Nature in the American West,” In Peluso, N.
and M.
Watts, eds., Violent Environments.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
October 23 - NO CLASS!
*** 11. October 26-27
(CONFERENCE): Lakshmi
Iyer, Mieke Meurs, Angus Wright, Jan French, Angela Cacciaru, Chengri
Ding, Joe
Kalo.
2) LOCATING AGRARIAN PUBLICS:
RURAL POLITICS AND ORGANIZATION
12. November 6 (WG):
Sandy Smith-Nonini
Anthropology, Elon and UNC
Chapel Hill
13. November 13 (CLASS): Agrarian Mobilization
Discussants: Tim, Tamara, Lisa
Readings (
Chatterjee,
Partha, "The
Nation and Its Peasants"
Arnold, Dennis. Gramsci
and the Peasantry.
Scott, J. C.
(1987). Domination
and the Arts of Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Selection.
Optional Reading:
Skocpol,
Theda, 1979. “What
Makes Peasants Revolutionary?,’ In Comparative
Politics 14(3): 35-73.
14. November 20 (WG)
Tony Bebbington, Geography,
Manchester
15. November 27 (CLASS)
Discussants: Mari and Wendy
Harvey, Neil. 1998. The Chiapas Rebellion.
Durham, NC: Duke University Press. “The
Right to have Rights,” (pp. 6-36).
Edelman,
Marc, 1999.
Peasants against Globalization: Rural Social Movements in
Costa Rica. Stanford, CA: Stanford
University Press. Introduction and
Conclusion (pp. 1-41 and 184-211).
Moore, Donald, 1997. “Remapping Resistance: ‘Ground for Struggle’ and the Politics of Place,” in Geographies of Resistance, edited by Steve Pile and Michael Keith. New York: Routledge. (pp. 87-107).
Harvey, David, 1996. Justice, Nature and the Geography of
Difference. Oxford: Blackwell
Publishers. Chapter 8: The Dialectics of
Social and Environmental Change (pp. 176-207).
McCarthy, James, 1998. "Environmentalism,
Wise Use and the
Nature of Accumulation in the Rural West," in Remaking Reality: Nature at
the Millenium, edited by Bruce Braun and Noel Castree. London: Routledge Press (pp. 126-150).
16. December 7 – 8
(CONFERENCE)