|
Introduction
Introduction
Part
1: Variables Influencing Teaching and Learning
System Variables
Teacher
Variables
Learner
Variables
Part 2: The Seven Steps of Planning --Plus
One
Weekly Assignment 1
Evaluating
Learning
Weekly Assignment 2
Analyzing Experiences
Feedback
|
Learning styles can be
described and assessed in a variety of
ways. We'll look at two approaches to describing learning styles, and
talk a bit about assessing them.
Learning Style: Dimensions Along a
Continuum
Learning style has multiple
dimensions, each of which can be
viewed on a continuum (the same approach we used for teaching style).
We'll consider five dimensions of learning style, you may be able to
think of others.
The five learning style
dimensions are described below.
Learning Style Dimensions
|
Concrete Thinking Abstract Thinking
Concrete thinkers learn
best from actually visualizing a task or idea.
Abstract thinkers can learn from symbols alone; often these learners
have stronger verbal skills.
Example
Most of you have taken
statistics. In statistics I'm
definitely a concrete thinker. When the formulas with all those "p
hats" and "q's" are presented, I just don't get it. However, when I see
examples using real numbers, it begins to make sense.
|
Deductive
Inductive
Deductive thinkers
learn best by learning rules and then deducing
actions from the rules. Inductive thinkers learn best by forming rules
from their experience.
Example
Most
of this content on teaching and learning is being presented in
an deductive fashion. That is, I'm presenting information (rules) to
guide your actions. Some of you might prefer to look at your experience
with teaching and learning to derive the guiding principles.
|
Auditory Visual
Auditory
learners learn best by listening to instructions, information, etc.
Visual learners learn best by "seeing" instructions, information, and
skills. This can mean observing the thing to be learned (like a
psychomotor skill), or it can mean reading the information.
Example
Here's
another example using myself as a
learner. When I do step aerobics, the instructor's cues are secondary
to watching what s/he does. If I'm facing away from the teacher, I'm
much less likely to get the move than if I'm able to see it. If the
instructor says one thing and does another, I'll usually do what s/he
does rather than what s/he says. Of course, if I already know the
routine, I do it "right" regardless of what the instructor says or does!
|
Orally Dependent Writing
Dependent
Orally
dependent learners learn best by talking about the material to be
learned, while writing dependent learners need to write.
Example
Some of you may find it helpful to
discuss assignments or class topics with others in your class,
colleagues at work, or even family and friends. Others of you may not
be so interested in dialog, but find it helpful to take notes when you
read, or find yourself taking notes in class even when an outline or
copies of slides are provided.
|
Solitary Social
Solitary
learners learn best alone, while social learners learn best in groups
where they are able to interact and support each other.
Example
Once again, think of
yourself as a
learner. Do you tend to initiate or join study groups? Enjoy discussion
and group activities in class? If so, your style is more social than
solitary. If, on the other hand, you prefer individual class activities
and assignments, your style is more solitary than social.
|
An individual's learning style can
fall at any point on each
continuum described above, and it may be different in different kinds
of learning situations. This means there are an infinite number of
possible learning styles, but most of us tend toward a preferred point
on each continuum, and can describe our preferred style based on that.
Try to identify where you fit on each continuum, and think about what
that tells you about your preferred learning style.
Learning Style Types--Kolb
Another way to look at
learning style is to combine similar
characteristics of various learning styles into learning style types.
One of the best known and often used classifications of learning styles
is that developed by Kolb. Kolb describes four learning style types:
accommodator; diverger; converger; and assimilator. The table below
highlights characteristics of learners in each group and provides
examples of teaching strategies that may be effective with each type of
learner. Notice that Kolb's types incorporate many of the dimensions of
learning style described in the previous section.
Accomodators
- Are action oriented, like doing things
- Solve problems intuitively by trial and error
- Prefer concrete learning experiences and active
experimentation
- Excel in adapting to specific, immediate
circumstances
Teaching strategies that
work well with this group include:
- Skill practice
- Problem solving
- Simulations
|
Divergers
- Are
imaginative
- Enjoy reflecting
- Can organize relationships into a meaningful
gestaldt (see the "big picture")
- Can view concrete situations from a number of
perspectives
- Prefer concrete learning experiences and reflection
- Tend to be interested in people and emotional
elements
Teaching strategies that
work well with this group include:
- Logs
- Journals
- Brainstorming
|
Convergers
- Like practical application (pragmatic)
- Use deductive reasoning
- Like to deal with things
- Prefer abstract conceptualization and active
experimentation
- Ask "How can I apply this?"
- Tend to be relatively unemotional
Teaching strategies that
work well with this group include:
- Laboratory work
- Skill practice
- Activities requiring application
|
Assimilators
- Create theoretical models
- Use inductive reasoning
- Like to deal with abstract concepts
- Prefer abstract conceptualization and reflective
observation
- Ask, "How does this relate to that?"
- Tend to be less interested in people and practical
application
Teaching strategies that
work well with this group include:
- Individual activities and assignments
- Reading
|
Two professors at NCSU have
developed a learning style assessment called "Index of Learning
Styles", which is available to try for free. If you'd like to assess your learning
style using this tool, click on the link below.
Assessing Learning Style
If you teach groups of people
over time, you can use
commercially available assessment tools. There are a number of tools
available, including Kolb's learning style inventory. This approach is
not practical in most areas of nursing practice.
Perhaps the most straightforward
way to assess learning style
is simply to talk to the learner. One way to do this is to ask the
learner to tell you about a really good/successful recent learning
experience. By listening carefully and asking follow-up questions you
can identify what kinds of activities work well for this learner.
Another option is to provide several kinds of learning activities, and
let the learner choose the one(s) that best suit him/her. For example,
you might offer written material, verbal explanation or going over
written material with the learner, audio-visuals, etc. Of course, if
you want to use this approach, you must have more than one type of
learning activity available.
If you are teaching a group,
but don't have an opportunity to
assess their individual learning styles, your best bet may be to
include a variety of activities in your session. You should choose
activities that are likely to appeal to learners with different styles,
so there will be something for everyone. This strategy can also be used
in designing materials for individual learners. For example, your
pamphlets could include words and pictures, practical suggestions as
well as more abstract information, etc. That way, one pamphlet could be
useful for learners with different styles.
Thinking about learning style in your practice
...
- Do you assess learning style as part of teaching in
your practice? If so, how do you do it? If not, how could you do it?
- How comfortable are you with using different
teaching methods to address different learning styles?
- How could you improve your practice to better
address learning styles?
- How could you improve the teaching materials
available to you so that they better address learning styles?
|
|