| Background Incubator
characteristics
Financing the
incubator
Incubator
development
Key concepts
Links to other incubator-related sites
Selected incubator literature
Other
economic development topics
Business incubators home page |
|
 | Local, regional, or state governments or other non-profit
organizations fund almost half (49 percent) of all incubators. The aim of these
programs is the economic development of a specific region through job creation,
diversifying the economic base, and expansion of the tax base. |
 | Universities and colleges finance 13 percent of
incubators. In addition to providing research and development opportunities to affiliated
professors and scientists, the goals of these facilities are similar to publicly funded
incubators. |
 | Private industry, investment groups, and real
estate partnerships run 12 percent of all incubators. The primary interest of this type of
incubator is the economic rewards from investing in tenant firms, returns from technology
or products produced by tenants, or from the development of the incubator real estate
itself. |
 | Hybrid incubators, which are the joint efforts of
government, non-profit organizations, economic development agencies, and private industry,
constitute 18 percent of all incubators nationally. Some of the advantages of this broad
based support include access to government funding and private sector business experience.
|
 | Non-conventional organizations fund the other 8
percent of incubators. |
Government funding entails at least a one-to-one match with local
or regional funds, however, the ratio is usually one-to-two or even one-to-three. Optimum
financing for an incubator would be a mixed package of state or federal grants, matching
funds from local or regional governments, and additional funding from local industry and
non-profit organizations. |
|

Who funds business
incubators?
-local, regional, or state governments or other non-profit
organizations (49%)
-universities and colleges
(13%)
-private industry,
investment groups, or real estate partnerships (12%)
-hybrids (18%)
-non-conventional
organizations (8%)
|