| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COLLECTIVE SECURITY, POSSE OR GLOBAL COP The US and Global Security at the Turn of the Century | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SESSION ONE: As the sole remaining superpower, the U.S. is faced with difficult decisions when crises arise: whether to act alone; or to tackle them in collaboration with like-minded allies, for example, through NATO; or to work for collective security principally in the United Nations Security Council. Hence the conference title: Collective Security, Posse or Global Cop. [FULL TEXT] Keynote Address: In an era of increasing globalization and proliferating transnational problems, the relevance and utility of the United Nations can only grow.This is not a boast, but an acknowledgment that often there is no alternative. [FULL TEXT] Europe in the Twenty-first Century The cold war was not a freezer, but an incubator of European cooperation. . . [Europe] is not and never will be a homogenized federation, but it is already far more than a confederation. [FULL TEXT] A View from the Bottom of the Globe: The U.S. has a fundamental role to play in helping to put together the capabilities to meet these types of emergency [wars of nationalism and separatism]. But so too have other countries. [FULL TEXT] African Crises: We cannot disengage from Africa because Americas own roots run too deep there and because we as a people are too deeply touched by the fate of Africans. [FULL TEXT] SESSION TWO: (to be presented in the Summer 2000 issue Latin America: Greece and Turkey: India and Pakistan: Concluding Discussion: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
