About the author *
|The author, now retired in Washington, D.C., served as a career U. S. diplomat from 1966 to 1993. Among his six posts abroad, he was consul general at Auckland, New Zealand. See a previous contribution of his to American Diplomacy, The Unpleasant and Uncopromising Captain Q. Members of the Foreign Service go to many exotic places, but in this article Sherman describes one of the more unusual assignments that an American diplomat can expect to receive Ed. |
ow that efficiency reports, inspections, promotion boards, etc., are things of the past for menow that Im retired, that isI can freely admit that it was more the life style and the exotica than the substance of the work that originally attracted me toand kept me ina Foreign Service career. When I was sixteen, a Foreign Service officer (FSO, for short) came to my high school civics class to tell us about international diplomacy. He spoke of his work, but what stayed with me was his description of the wonderful places he had visited; the languages he spoke; and the exotic people he had gotten to know. I set my goal that day to become a diplomat and partake of those experiences.
In the ensuing years I finished my schooling and entered the Service as I had planned. My first three assignments took me to three very different exciting and colorful postings. I learned languages and interacted with members of wonderfully alien cultures, just as I had hoped.
As broad and enlightening as they had been, however, nothing in those postings abroad prepared me for what the Foreign Service had in store for me thereafteran assignment in Kansas! Yes, Kansas in the Great Midwest, the land of wheat, corn, never-ending flatness, prairie dogs, and that unforgettable duo, Dorothy and Toto. But I digress
In 1975 I returned to the State Department from those three tours abroad to a job in the Department of State staff secretariat. There I joined the team of young FSOs running to keep up with Secretary Kissinger through the period of mid-east shuttle diplomacy and a seemingly endless series of visits to Europe and the Peoples Republic of China. By mid 1976, thoroughly exhausted but also exhilarated by the heady experiences, I was assigned to a desk in the Africa Bureau. Within a few weeks, however, I was contacted by a colleague in the personnel division who asked me to make an appointment to see Larry Eagleburger, then deputy undersecretary for management, about "something important."
Eagleburger was watching over the assembling of the first group of FSOs to participate in a new domestic assignments program. The program aimed to put FSOs into various positions with state and local governments for a year, with the goal of improving mutual understanding between the Foreign Service and the people it servedAmericans. The legislation creating the program was, as I remember, a piece of the departments authorization bill and was sponsored by Senator James Pearson of Kansas (hence, the Pearson Program). Eagleburger was eager to get someone into the program and into Kansas. He lauded the program to me and asked me to meet with Pearson to discuss it. I spent most of a day with the charming senator, who exuded enthusiastic support for the program. He believed it could bridge the considerable gap between the average American and his countrys diplomatic corps, an organization that average Americans often saw as a snobbish, elitist fraternity involved in activities of questionable legality and utility, in places with strange-sounding names. And, he said, too often the Foreign Service officer forgets that he represents all the people of our country, not just the State Department and the administration in power. Pearson believed that if we could get our diplomats into the average community where they could serve a useful purpose, the misconceptions on both parts would be dissipated.
When we got down to details, the senator told me that, while they had been having some difficulties finding a proper place in Kansas to which an FSO could usefully be assigned, his office, working with Eagleburger, had finally identified an appropriate organizationa consortium of small private colleges and universities headquartered in a small town in the geographic center of the state. The organizations members included six institutions, four of which had student bodies numbering fewer than 500. The other two were only slightly larger. All were associated with one or another Christian denomination. When I remarked to him that my personal "religion" was an amorphous mix of humanism, rationalism, Jungian teachings, and a few dim vestiges of a mostly-Anglican childhood, Pearson suggested I visit the locus of my proposed assignment before deciding.
As a sign of the Departments eagerness (desperation?) to get someone to Kansas, the personnel system agreed to cut orders for a quick trip to central Kansas to look over the territory. Imagine, if you can, them doing that for someone assigned to the Central African Republic.
Arriving in Kansas was a revelation. Other than a few stops at Chicago airports, I had never before set foot in that big chunk of America lying between the coast on which I grew up and the one to which I gravitated. That endless wasteland passing below, while I ate a plastic meal and watched an in-flight movie, had until then remained my terra incognita.
At the Wichita airport language difficulties cropped up immediately. It was only after several "Hows thats?" from me that the attractive young lady at the car rental desk slowed her speech enough so that I could recognize it as English. She adopted her "Avis- talk for foreigners" voice and I soon had a car.
The drive north to the village of my fate was uneventful, but illustrative of Kansas overwhelming physical characteristicflatness. The town itself was a fairly attractive blip on the prairie, consisting of two principal streets (Main and First) which crossed at the only street light. Radiating out from that central point, streets called Maple, Elm, and Ash went one way, and 2nd, 3rd, etc., the other. At about Fifth and Ash the town ended and the wheat fields began.
The college consortium leadership had organized a day for me with the presidents of the colleges and members of certain faculties. These people proved familiaracademics with interesting minds, worldly in their way, and extremely welcoming of my candidacy. I was sufficiently flattered and convinced to take this assignment to phone Pearsons and Eagleburgers offices from there to say I was in.
Arriving to begin the assignment several weeks later, just before classes commenced at the colleges, I set myself up in the consortium headquarters and undertook visits to each campus. Three proved to have delightfully green and well-treed campuses, looking like ideal settings for an Andy Hardy movie. The other three, located in villages which made my new hometown feel like Manhattan, inhabited less grassy and less oak-y campuses cut from surrounding prairie land which, following the recent harvest, appeared particularly desolate to my urban eyes.
My reception at each college was warm and welcoming, but I was questioned fairly closely at some of the institutions about what I planned to do during my assignment. I explained my intent to offer classes in the realities of international relations. The first semester they would be presented at three of the colleges and open to students from the others. The following semester, I proposed to teach different courses at the other three colleges. In addition, I would present special programs at each college and (as the Department had insisted) I would be a "resource" to all the communities of Kansasmeaning my presence had been announced and I could expect invitations to address church, school, and civic groups.
The reserve with which my course descriptions were received by some of the college officials should have prepared me for what followed. Initially all went well. Classes began and I found myself teaching a basic course in international relations on three of the campuses, including the one I had privately identified as the "most primitive" of the lot. The colleges entire town was populated by members of a particularly conservative sub-sect of a church that operated one of the other colleges, and was the least accepting of ideas alien to its particular Biblical interpretations. A review of the colleges offerings for the semester showed me that my class was essentially the only course offered which might have been said to look outward. This college specialized in agricultural sciences, physical sciences as they applied in the practical world faced by the community, accounting, and courses focusing on its religious denomination, its history, its personalities, and its dogmas.
This particular college, unlike the other members of the consortium, was not known for creating broad-based historians, lyric poets, beatniks, Peace Corps volunteers, nor, indeed, FSOs. I found that on this campus the way my students could connect their own experience to what I was teaching was to compare my course material with their churchs missionary undertakings. Those activities, focused in Central America, consisted of admirable efforts to teach farming methods and health sciences to rural people, and less admirably perhapsto convince those people of the validity of the churchs dogma. I spent an inordinate amount of class time trying to differentiate, in the abstract and the particular, between diplomacy and the practice of "mission." Little did I suspect that my efforts were under close and critical scrutiny by elders of the denominationelders who wrote the checks and controlled the colleges academic leadership.
The first I knew that something unexpected was afoot was when I returned to my office at the consortium headquarters one day to learn that the president of this particular college, accompanied by a few of the church elders, had visited my office that morning, ostensibly to see me. It seemed strange to me that they should have come during the time I was scheduled to be on their campus thirty-five miles away. According to the consortium secretary, the group had waited in my office for thirty minutes, then departed rather hastily without a word to her. I looked around my office. My books and pictures were all where they should be, so the elders hadnt been bent on larceny, I decided.
The mystery bothered me enough for me to telephone the academic dean at the college. Though a devout member of the church, the dean was liberally educated and had always seemed a reasonable interlocutor. He was evasive, however, when I asked why his boss and the elders had come. They had not yet returned, he told me, so he was unable to enlighten me. He would let me know.
I wasnt scheduled to teach on that campus until the following week and had pretty well forgotten the incident when the dean called me just before my next class. In a reserved and tense voice he said he had something to tell me. I mentally girded my loins for bad news. The college board of directors and elders had been meeting over the previous few days on general college policies and had, inter alia, discussed me. I was only moderately interested, not for a moment believing that I could have been an important issue for the august body. "They have made a pronouncement," he told me, "concerning you." He added that any pronouncement by this board was serious and would go out to all members of the denomination. I took this in, waiting patiently for the substance of the ukase. He continued in a hoarse whisper: "They have declared that you were sent by the Devil to tempt us and to lead our children astray."
My immediate, unvoiced reaction was a sarcastic "wow, recognition at last!" After a thoughtful silence, however, I asked what this meant. The dean explained that the board, after debate and hearing witnesses (including himself, he admitted), had decided that the devil, apparently not Eagleburger, had sent me to try and lead their young people astray. They were prepared, however, for such forays by the dark demon and had swung into action. The boards declaration was sufficient, they felt. They had decided that I was not to be denied access to the college, nor was I to be constrained in my activities in their college or community. I was to be monitored closely, however, and my true identity was to be exposed to all from the pulpit.
I was shocked, finally, and, just for a moment, wondered if my leg was being pulled. I pressed the dean for an explanation of how the board had come to this conclusion. I was bemused by his explanation. In a deep serious voice he explained that the college president and his colleagues had visited my office during my absence, after hearing from a student, who had visited me there, that they would discover clear evidence of my diabolical background. And evidence they found.