This quote barely hints at why the theories of John
Maynard Keynes chaffed the nerves of his classically-oriented colleagues.
Keynes, in both his private life and in his professional work, delighted in
debunking the conventional wisdom of his day. The
financier Bernard Baruch once squelched a renowned but argumentative
economist with the joust, “If you're so smart, why aren't you rich?” Keynes
would have been unembarrassed by such a question. A keen observer of human
affairs, he amassed a private fortune by speculating in commodities, foreign
currencies, and stock market securities. Keynes
was equally successful in the social, political, and academic arenas. He
married a leading Russian ballerina and was among the inner circle of the Much
of modern macroeconomics derives from Keynes’ 1936 work, The General
Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, which summarized his
reaction to contradictions between classical economic theory and the
worldwide “Great Depression.” His General Theory challenged the
conventional view that aggregate equilibrium is synonymous with full
employment. Keynes was dismayed by persistent and high rates of unemployment
throughout market-oriented economies, and sought to reconstruct theory to
explain this phenomenon. He concluded that, far from being inconsistent with
aggregate equilibrium, unemployment might in fact be a consequence of it. In
short, Keynes argued that a capitalist economy might experience high
unemployment as a long term situation unless some external force were used to
reduce it. For practical and political reasons, he thought that this external
force must come from government and should take the form of large
expenditures on public works projects capable of mobilizing idle manpower.
Therefore, Keynes turned away from a long tradition in economic thought of “laissez-faire,”
which discouraged government intervention in the economy. There
is generally a long lag between ideas and actions. Although some of Keynes'
ideas were lightly tested shortly after World War II in the Whether
Keynes' massive reconstruction of economic theory was basically correct and
will endure is debatable, but critics and proponents agree that Keynes made
many valuable specific contributions. There is little doubt that much of
Keynesian economics has proven extremely durable, and forever will influence
our views of how market economies work. Footnote: 1 How long it takes chronologically before
the short run is swamped by long-run adjustments is the crux of continuing debates
about the implications of theory for policy. Even much of the “modern monetarism” of Milton Friedman is arguably based in Keynesian theory in its focus on
the importance of aggregate demand as a determinant of out put in the short
run. See the Quotes on this site for some discussion. More websites on Keynes: John Maynard Keynes and The Keynesian Revolution at the History of Economic Thought site Brad DeLong's site on Keynes |
|||||
|
Author:
Ralph Byrns |
|||||
|
Economics
instructors and students are hereby granted provisional permission to use these
materials for educational purposes only. Commercial use of any of these
materials is forbidden. Withdrawal of this permission may be announced at
this site without notice, and these materials may not be used thereafter
without written permission. |
|||||