Fiscal Policy and the Great Depression
____________________________________________________________________________
|
depression: |
|
||
|
crowding-out
hypothesis: |
The crowding-out
hypothesis is the idea that increases in federal spending inevitably
cause reductions in private consumption or investment. For example, increases
in government borrowing to cover a budget deficit may increase interest
rates, reducing investment. The crowding-out hypothesis assumes that the
economy is initially at a full employment level of output. |
||
|
absorption problem: |
The absorption problem is a generalization of the
crowding out hypothesis, and summarizes how crowding out may cross
international borders. The absorption
problem is summarized by the equation: [G–T] = [S–I] + [M–X]. Thus, any
federal government budget deficit (G-T) must be offset by an excess of
private saving over private investment (S–I) or by an excess of imports over exports (M–X). This equation is a simplification and
rearrangement of an accounting identity for Aggregate Expenditures: Y = C + I + G + (X–M) = C + S + T. If the economy is at its
productive capacity, then unless a federal deficit is funded by foreigners (M–X), private investment may be “crowded
out” because G–T will equal S–I. |
||
|
The Great Depression Output
plummeted worldwide during “The Great Depression” of the 1930s. In the United
States, the rate of unemployment rose from roughly 4-5% in 1929 to a high
estimated at 25% in 1933. Output and employment did not completely recover
until the onset of World War II. In
the figure (above - right), suppose the economy was initially in a severe
depression, at point d. An increase
in government spending to point f
could trigger expansions of private investment and consumption (and saving)
through a Keynesian multiplier process, resulting in a further adjustment to
point b. The expansion of private
consumption and investment shown as the move from point f to point b is
sometimes called crowding-in. At
point b, government spending and
tax revenues and private consumption, saving, and investment could all exceed
the levels at initial point d. The
increase in economic activity in the U.S. economy during 1940-1943 as this
country mobilized for war mirrored this movement from point d to point b. Note: Military spending is not necessary to precipitate
such a movement, which could as readily be prompted by public works projects
(or even a mammoth federally sponsored Easter egg hunt). |
|||
|
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Author: Ralph Byrns |
|
|||
|
Economics
instructors and students are hereby granted provisional permission to use
these materials for educational purposes only. Commercial use of any of these
materials is forbidden. Withdrawal of this permission may be announced at
this site without notice, and these materials may not be used thereafter without
written permission. |
|
|||
|
||||