Chapter Thirty-Six. 512

International Finance. 512

 

May I Have My Change Please?. 513

Permanent International Seignorage. 513

A Strong Currency for a Net Importer. 513

An International Big McTasty Attack. 514

The International Trade Triangle. 515

Introducing the Balance of Payments. 517

Are Trade and Payments Deficits Harmful?. 518

Interest Rate Parity Theorems. 519

Exchange Controls and Black Markets. 519

Does Exchange Flexibility Spread Inflation Internationally or Isolate It?. 520

 

 

Chapter Thirty-Six

International Finance


May I Have My Change Please?

Roger H. Goldberg, University of Memphis

To motivate the necessity of a market for foreign exchange, I offer to purchase a pen at the outset of class.  The willing seller who comes forth is given a 1000 lira note in payment.  (I stress the "one thousand" denomination for the benefit of the class when concluding the transaction).  The recipient of the note invariably asks, "What do I do with this?"  This provides the instructor with immediate opportunity to highlight the different mediums of exchange economies use and to suggest the necessity of markets which will allow for exchange between the monetary instruments of different nations.  The class is asked as a concluding exercise to research the current exchange value of the lira and other currencies from their daily newspapers.  (Postscript: Did the teacher "get a good deal" on the pen?)

Permanent International Seignorage

Robert T. Averitt, Smith College

I tell the following story when discussing international exchange markets. One of four friends dies. The three remaining friends decide to honor their friendship while standing at the open grave. The first friend drops a $100 bill into the open grave. The second friend does the same. The third friend does not have a $100 bill, so he writes the deceased a check for $100 and drops the check in the grave. Then the open grave is covered. The first two friends have lowered their net worth by $100, the third friend has not. Dollars in international trade are like checks. If dollars do not return to the United States as claims on U.S. goods and services, the Americans who spent the dollars receive valuable goods or services while the U.S. economy only gives up money, a commodity with an extremely low marginal cost of production.

A Strong Currency for a Net Importer

Gautam Mukerjee, University of Pittsburgh‑Bradford

I explain the need for a strong currency for a country such as Great Britain by using the marriage of Prince Charles and Lady Diana as an example. I try to impress on the students how the British government saw the marriage as an opportunity to boost tourism and the publicity department steeped the interest of foreigners through carefully planted mysteries about the wedding dress and other paraphernalia of the wedding. All this was aimed at strengthening an all too weak British currency in an economy riddled with inflation. Although the campaign to promote tourism was not too successful in the wake of terrorism, this example shows how a fascination with royalty may be tapped for its economic potential.

An International Big McTasty Attack

John P. Manzer, Purdue University

Students frequently do not understand the nature of foreign exchange conversions or the significance of rate changes upon international trade.  This short exercise is designed to involve students in a quick analysis demonstrating the importance of the process.

 

            McTasty, Inc. is a U.S. based fast food chain with a large number of outlets in the United Kingdom and West Germany.  Over 80% of its European summer and fall sales are to U.S. residents traveling abroad.  Because of your excellent progress in your economics studies, you have been asked to analyze this season's European price schedule.  Currently the pound is selling for $2 and the mark for $.50.  Using the European price schedules in Table 37‑1, determine the dollar costs to U.S. travelers of eating McTasty's outlets in the United Kingdom and West Germany.

 

                                                Pound            $ Cost in                     Mark           $ Cost in

                                                United               United Kingdom      West            West Germany

                                                Kingdom           for U.S.                    Germany      for U.S.

Item                                        Price                 Traveler                   Price             Traveler

Mctasty Burger                         1.5                     _____                       5                   _____

Deluxe Mctasty Burger             2                        _____                       8                   _____

French Fries                             1                        _____                       2                   _____

Ice Cream Sundae                    .5                       _____                       2.5                _____

 

Table 37‑1

            It appears that a number of international events may change exchange rates next season.  It is predicted that the pound will sell for $1.80 and the mark for $.60.  Using the same European prices calculate the dollar costs to U.S. travelers for next season for Table 37‑2.

 

                                                            New $ Cost in                                     New $ Cost in

                                                            United Kingdom                                 West Germany

                                                            for U.S.                                               for U.S.

Item                                                    Traveler                                              Traveler

 

Mctasty Burger                         _____                                                  _____

Deluxe McTasty Burger                        _____                                                  _____

French Fries                                         _____                                                  _____

Ice Cream Sundae                                _____                                                  _____

Table 37‑2

            Using the new exchange rates, complete Table 37‑3 and determine the costs of McTasty products for West Germany and the United Kingdom travelers.

 

         Pound     Mark Cost      Pound Cost in

         United    in United Kingdom     Mark West     West Germany for

                                    Kingdom         for West Germany     Germany         United Kingdom

Item                                        Price                Travelers                    Price                Travelers

 

Mctasty Burger             1.5                   _____                          5                      _____

Deluxe Mctasty Burger 2                      _____                          8                      _____

French Fries                             1                      _____                          2                      _____

Ice Cream Sundae                    .5                     _____                          2.5                   _____

 

Table 37‑3

                                                Pound            $ Mark Cost in                             $ Cost in

                                                United               United Kingdom      Mark           Germany for

                                                Kingdom           for German              Germany      United Kingdom

Item                                        Price                 Travelers                 Price             Travelers

Mctasty Burger                         1.5                     _____                       5                   _____

Deluxe Mctasty Burger             2                        _____                       8                   _____

French Fries                             1                        _____                       2                   _____

Ice Cream Sundae                    .5                       _____                       2.5                _____

 

            How have changes in exchange rates affected the relative prices of McTasty's European products?

 

            What types events may effect the supply and demand for different currencies?

 

            Additional issues of class discussion might include the effects of changing currency values upon a firm’s profitability and the types strategies they might utilize to protect themselves from non‑operating currency fluctuation losses.

The International Trade Triangle

Anthony N. Duruh, Warner Southern College

            The International Trade Triangle is very suitable for clarifying how the imbalance of trade can occur between two countries.  For example, trade imbalance between the United States and Japan can be illustrated with the International Trade Triangle:

Figure 37‑1

Winners and Losers

 

            The International Trade Triangle produces a winner and a loser.  The winner is the country with trade surplus, while the loser is the country with a trade deficit.

How Japan Creates Trade Surpluses

 

            Japan does it by exporting raw materials to Mexico.  Mexico has abundant cheap labor compared to labor costs in either Japan or the United States.  Japanese subsidiaries in Mexico utilize Mexican cheap labor and low overhead cost to produce goods inside Mexico.  The finished goods and sometimes semi‑finished goods are re‑exported to the United States to be sold here for had cash.  The hard currency is then returned to Japan to pay for raw materials and purchase more raw materials.  The excess of revenue over cost results in super‑normal profit for Japan.

 

            A look at the graph reveals the imbalance of trade between Japan and the United States.

 

The Loser

 

            The United States becomes the loser in this international trade triangle.  How? The United States exports less to Japan than what Japan sells in the United States, thereby creating an imbalance of trade between the two trading partners.

 

Other Uses of the International Trade Triangle

           

            The International Trade Triangle is useful for explaining the following:

                        1.         Comparative Advantage

                        2.         Foreign currency transactions

                        3.         Arbitrage

                        4.         Dumping

                        5.         Non‑restrictive and restrictive foreign currency.

 

Introducing the Balance of Payments

Jannett K. Highfill, Bradley University, and

William V. Weber, Eastern Illinois University

The foreign exchange market for dollars can be used to help students understand the economic balance of payments.  Foreign agents demand U.S. dollars when they (1) buy U.S. exports (recorded as U.S. current account exports, abbreviated CAX) and (2) lend financial capital in the U.S. (recorded as U.S. capital account inflows, abbreviated KAI).  Thus we can write the foreign demand for dollars as CAX + KAI.  Similarly, dollars are supplied as foreign exchange by domestic agents in order to acquire the foreign currency that they need to (1) import goods and services from abroad (recorded as U.S. current account imports, abbreviated CAM) and (2) loan capital abroad (recorded as U.S. capital account outflows, abbreviated KAO).  So the U.S. supply of dollars in the foreign exchange market can be written as CAM + KAO.

            When these relationships are placed on the supply/demand diagram of the foreign exchange market for dollars (see attached figure), the economic balance of payments is readily seen to be the difference between the quantity demanded and quantity supplied of dollars.  The easiest case, of course, corresponds to the supply/demand equilibrium.  It is virtually self-evident from the graph that if exchange rates are truly flexible, then the economic balance of payments is neither in surplus nor in deficit at the equilibrium exchange rate.  If instead the value of the dollar is above its equilibrium level (which might occur under fixed or managed-float exchange rates), the graph makes it apparent that the sum of current account exports and capital account inflows (i.e., the quantity demanded of dollars) is smaller than the sum of current account imports and capital account outflows (i.e., the quantity supplied of dollars), and thus the balance of payments is in deficit and official transactions on the official settlements balance are required.

Figure 37-2

Are Trade and Payments Deficits Harmful?

Ralph T. Byrns

Many people, including quite a few economists, are alarmed by the persistence of huge U.S. deficits in international trade and our balance of payments. An alternative perspective is that a U.S. trade deficit reflects a situation wherein we give up goods that absorb fewer resources than the goods we import from foreigners, and make up the difference by "exporting" dirty green paper that has a very low production cost. Suggest to your students that the most valuable U.S. exports since 1951 have been the dollar and dollar‑denominated securities.

 

            Argue, further, that foreigners who have absorbed dollars must have perceived that they were gaining from their payments surpluses because they acquired units of an international medium of exchange. The dollar is also highly valued internationally for precautionary reasons because it is considered a secure asset. Suggest to your students that our international "seignorage" has also yielded several kinds of gains to most Americans:

 

         a.      American consumers gain from trade deficits because more goods are available in total, and at lower prices.

 

         b.      American firms have gained because U.S. payments deficits have facilitated their investments abroad.

 

         c.      American policymakers have used the worldwide acceptability of the dollar as leverage in international negotiations, and have often secured concessions by foreign governments. "Dollar diplomacy" is generally preferable to gunboat diplomacy.

 

            The basic question here is whether the persistent outflows of dollars can be viewed as semi‑permanent exports. To rebut the counterargument that foreign holdings of dollars will return and imposes a future burden on Americans, point out that foreigners have demonstrated a huge appetite for dollars; the U.S. has experienced payments deficits in the current account persistently for more than a decade. Japanese use dollars to buy Brazilian coffee, Arabs use dollars to buy Toyotas, etc. The U.S. dollar is the world's major medium of exchange, and it is also perceived as an appropriate store of value by residents of countries that are economically or politically unstable. Thus, most Americans gain through international seignorage when our balance of trade (or payments) is in deficit because our FED is, de facto, the world's banker.

Interest Rate Parity Theorems

J. Harold McClure, Jr., Claremont Graduate School

I offer a way to motivate a students' desire to learn interest rate parity theorems found in basic international economics. The international Fisher equivalent gives the market's best forecast of future spot exchange rates under ideal conditions. However, to make profits, one must beat a market (if one can). At the beginning of the second quarter of 1985, Eurosterling interest rates were about three percentage points above Eurodollars rates so the market would be forecasting a 3 percent per year dollar appreciation (its value would go from 1.2443 $/pound to 1.2350 $/pound in 90 days. If one accepted a global monetarist guess that differential money growth determines exchange rate behavior, the fact that U.S. M1 growth was two percentage points higher than U.K. M1 growth suggests dollar devaluation. Holding British assets would earn higher nominal return plus an expected capital gain. One can then warn students of exchange rate risks, failures of predictive models, etc.

 

            NOTE: Sources for recent Eurocurrency rates and forward/spot exchange rates include The Economist and Wall Street Journal.

Exchange Controls and Black Markets

Ralph T. Byrns

The governments of many less developed countries and countries within the Soviet sphere often fix the exchange rates for their currencies at untenably high levels. They will buy foreign currencies at the official rate, but refuse to redeem most privately‑held currency at comparable rates for foreign currencies. The result is that black markets for foreign currencies abound, and fortunes can be made by government insiders who can get domestic currency exchanged at official rates for foreign currency.

 

            For example, Vietnamese piasters could not legally be redeemed for U.S. currency by private individuals during 1964‑74, but U.S. currency legally was supposed to be exchanged for piasters only at government offices. Top level noncommissioned U.S. soldiers in Vietnam were caught buying piasters with dollars on the black market, then exchanging the piasters for dollars at the official rate, then returning to the black market, ad infinitum. Many U.S. soldiers and Vietnamese officials made fortunes through this illegal form of arbitrage, and most were never apprehended.

Does Exchange Flexibility Spread Inflation Internationally or Isolate It?

Ralph T. Byrns

Point out to your students that standard theory predicts that flexible exchange rates should insulate a domestic economy from foreign inflation. Exchange rates should fall for currencies issued by countries experiencing relatively high inflation, and should rise for currencies where price levels are relatively stable.

 

            Many critics of flexible exchange rates take a contrary position and have blamed flexibility for high rates of inflation. Presumably, their argument rests on high‑inflation countries' inability to export and diffuse their inflationary pressures; the exchange rates of other countries simply appreciate so that a country experiencing rapid inflation is isolated as effectively as quarantined patients in TB wards once were. Classroom discussions of the implications of both approaches tends to be lively.

Notes: