Organized
by: Tanja Börzel (Max Planck-Bonn), Liesbet Hooghe (UNC), Gary Marks
(UNC) and Thomas Risse (Freie Univ. Berlin)
This workshop seeks
to spawn a dialogue between exponents of federalism and multi-level
governance in analyzing the character and development of governance in Europe.
New
forms of governance in Europe have gained the attention of scholars in economics,
political science, sociology, international relations, and public policy and
administration. These scholars have identified common features, such as the
growth of public/private networks at every level, and the dispersion of authority
from central states up to supranational institutions and down to subnational
governments. Many have singled out the Europe/ European Union as a particularly
fertile ground for studying these developments. But how "new" are these forms
of governance? Do public/private partnerships replace or complement public
authoritative decision making? To what extent does dispersion of authority
above and below the central state transform authority in Europe? And how can
one understand variation in governance? This workshop focuses on two issues
in this governance agenda:
1. What
is the role of private/ functional vs. territorial actors? How can we account
for changing patterns of authority dispersion across territorial and functional
lines?
2. What is the role
of hierarchy vs. networking? What role does hierarchy play compared to alternative
modes of governance such as self-organization, networking, and market (competition)?
The scholars at this
workshop have approached these developments from different angles. Some have
tried to extend existing theories of jurisdictional change, most prominently
federalism, to understand dispersion of authority beyond traditional interstate
relations. Others have suggested new terms, such as multi-tiered governance,
polycentric governance, multi-perspectival governance, FOCJ, and multi-level
governance, to emphasize the qualitative difference between traditional government
and alternative forms of governance. Yet others have sought to make sense of
variation in governance by combining insights from either tradition. Our goal
in this workshop is to spark a debate between exponents of these strands, and
identify future lines of analysis.