|

|
Selected Research Projects
Glacier National Park, Montana:
Spectral-Field Analyses of Vegetation
at the Alpine Treeline Ecotone
Research within Glacier National Park, Montana has been conducted over
the years by a team of researchers lead by Stephen J. Walsh, University
of North Carolina, George P. Malanson, University of Iowa, and David R.
Butler, Southwest Texas State University. Research collaboration, initially
begun doctoral their studies, now includes: Daniel G. Brown, Michigan State
University, David M. Cairns, Texas A & M University, Thomas R. Allen,
Old Dominion University, Stephen J. McGregor, University of North Carolina,
and Ling Bian, SUNY-Buffalo.
View the Satellite
Image Library
GNP Database
Form and Pattern in the Alpine Environment:
Glacier National Park, Montana
Our research into the spatial and biophysical character of mountain
environments has focused on Glacier National Park, Montana, USA. The Park
is characterized by pronounced topographic variability resulting in strong
biophysical gradients that shape the corresponding vegetative landscape.
The glacial history of the Park, its position astride the Continental Divide,
its past geologic setting and present geomorphic processes, its spatial
and biophysical complexity, and its relative inaccessibility have necessitated
the development of an analytical framework that integrates satellite remotely-sensed
data with biophysical coverages contained within a geographic information
system for spatial analysis and modeling.
Our research within the Park has generally been organized around a set
of primary initiatives:
-
Development of a GIS to support spatial and biophysical studies of processes
and feature distributions;
-
Implementation of resource evaluation studies through the manipulation
of the derived GIS databases, for the evaluation of natural hazards and
snow-avalanche paths; assessment of lake turbidity levels and relationships
to basin morphometry; identification of deltaic wetlands; and evaluation
of forest fire potential;
-
Examination of scale dependencies of plant biomass and topography and spatial
analyses of derived patterns of the distributions of krummholz patches
and associated alpine and subalpine features;
-
Cartographic and quantitative modeling of disturbance factors and topoclimatic
variables affecting the biophysical landscape at the alpine treeline ecotone.
Study Area
GNP is a UNESCO-designated Biosphere Reserve of 405,000 ha, with peaks
to an altitude of 3,100m, in northwestern Montana, USA. It was chosen as
the study site for our research because of its ecotonal position at the
eastern edge of the climatic region dominated by Pacific maritime air in
the northwestern US, as well as for its ecotonal transition from mountains
to the Great Plains. The Park also has been selected by the National Park
Service to lead the park-oriented scientific investigations of responses
to global climate change.
Two mountain ranges, both with glaciers at the present time, occur within
the Park: the Livingston Range and the Lewis Range. The Continental Divide
follows the Livingston Range in the north and then shifts to the more easterly
Lewis Range. The Park area was heavily glaciated during the Pleistocene,
but a number of mountain crest and upland surfaces in the Lewis Range escaped
glaciation. These gently sloping uplands are largely at or above treeline,
with a variety of exposures, and are or have been subjected to periglacial
mass-wasting and patterned ground formation in the recent past. Areas above
treeline in the Livingston Range tend to be steeper and more geomorphically
active, with little colluvial cover. The periglacial environment in the
Park is currently encountered above approximately 1,950 - 2,000m, with
current processes producing patterned ground above ca. 2,170m, and relict
features occurring in the roughly 200, of transition between 1,950 and
2,170m. As a result of the its location, there are two distinct climatic
regions within the Park., West of the Continental Divide, the climate is
generally milder and more moist, akin to a Pacific maritime climatic pattern.
East of the Divide, the climate is much harsher, with more severe low temperatures,
stronger winds, and drier conditions. Snow avalanches include both wet-snow
and dry-powder types, but historical data suggest that the former is much
more common, especially on western slopes.
Tree species comprising the upper treeline ecotone reflect climatic
differences: west of the Divide, upper treeline is comprised primarily
of subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa), Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii),
and subalpine larch (Larix lyallii); whereas east of the Divide, treeline
is dominated by subalpine fir, whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis), and limber
pine (Pinus flexilis). Approximately two-thirds of the Park is forested.
The subalpine forest grades into the alpine environment, characterized
by the diminished vegetation density representative of tundra vegetation
and bare rock, snow, and ice surfaces. On the eastern side of the Park,
two treelines are evident: an upper temperature-related treeline, and a
drought-related treeline at low elevations. The spatial extent of this
vegetation grading, clearly evident at alpine treeline, is related to elevation,
topographic orientation, topographic controls, and disturbances. The eastern
two-thirds of the Park are dominated by unvegetated and more sparsely vegetated
surfaces. These are interrupted by valleys and hanging-valleys of subalpine
forest, brush, and herbaceous cover resulting primarily from the position
of the Continental Divide and local orientations of the topography and
landforms carved by glaciers. Snow-avalanche paths are striking features
that extend from the alpine to the subalpine environment throughout the
Park. Where vegetation disturbances exist, such as snow-avalanche paths
and debris flows, the boundary between vegetated and unvegetated surfaces
is distinct, and the transition zone from subalpine forest to alpine conditions
is spatially irregular, depending on the pattern and type of disturbance.
Conclusions
The development of a GIS was an essential element of the spatial and
biophysical research conducted within the Park. The GIS facilitated the
integration of remotely-sensed information with core GIS coverages; HIS
coverages and attribute fields derived through manipulation of the core
coverages; calculated statistical coverages and spatial measures of feature
distances and distributions; and spatially normalized and pattern-defined
indices of spatial structure. The spatial operations provided through the
GIS permitted not only the verification of remote sensing inputs to the
GIS by comparison to existing GIS coverages and field measurements recorded
in the database, but also the validation of GIS coverages by comparison
to remote sensing inputs and to other GIS coverages. The spatial perspective
afforded by the GIS also facilitated the generation of new hypotheses and
the explanation of established research questions. Spatial operations were
essential to the manipulation of the GIS database to support spatial and
biophysical queries and for the display of research results as three-dimensional
graphics and feature drapes along with statistical findings presented as
models, spatial deviations from models, and measures of the spatial pattern,
spatial ordering, and spatial structure of diverse phenomena.
The research into spatial dependence and spatial analysis suggests the
interrelationships of scale, pattern, and process, as well as the importance
of fractal and semivariance analyses to the examination of the characteristic
scale that controls much of the primary biophysical variation within the
study area.
Our research on alpine treeline provides information on the relationships
between multiple and interacting environmental factors and patterns of
vegetation. The effects of spatial interactions will be included in subsequent
models to test the importance of spatial autocorrelation for describing
the pattern of alpine treeline components. Because the spatial pattern
of vegetation at an ecotone is an importance component of its response
to environmental change or disturbance, the determination of the range
of patterns and their related processes is important in order to be able
to identify which patterns represent potential fronts for the invasion
of vegetation as a consequence of global climate change. Models that explore
the relationship between the location and character of alpine treeline,
together with sets of derived topoclimatic variables that describe the
differences between predicted and observed patterns of alpine treeline,
were used to develop local disturbance variables to complement the more
regional indicators of the treeline ecotone.
Leaf
Area Index (LAI), the area of leaves per unit ground area, and leaf area
distribution are fundamental measures of canopy structure. Together, they
indicate the amount of foliage present and its distribution, both critical
vegetation parameters that strongly influence the rates of evapotranspiration
and photosynthesis. Spatial variation in the canopy structure over the
landscape provides a quantitative measure of ecological heterogeneity.
High resolution satellites are capable of monitoring canopy structure over
time and space following the establishment of correlations between LAI
measurements of in-situ conditions and satellite spectral responses (Peterson
and Running 1989). Regional variations in LAI were found to be linearly
related to site water balance, above-ground net primary production, and
stand volume growth of western conifer forests (McLeod and Running 1988,
Nemani and Running 1989). The ability to estimate and map LAI on landscape
scales from satellite remote sensing has given ecologists and bgiogeographers
an opportunity to extend their theories of water and carbon exchange from
leaf level to landscape scales (Running et al. 1987).
Spectral
indices are empirical regression-based relationships between remotely-sensed
radiance values and LAI. These spectral indices have been shown to have
validity over a wide range of scenes and sensors. Canopy closure is a key
spatial variable governing the scene brightness in conifer canopies, because
it controls the fraction of understory and overstory visible to the sensor
(Spanner et al. 1990). Nemani et al (1987) has included the middle-infrared
spectral wavelengths, together with the red-visible and near-infrared wavlengths,
in an adjusted version of the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index for
that estimating canopy closure from satellite data. These spectral regions
are sensitive to the moisture content of the leaf, plant pigmentation,
and the chlorophyll content of the leaf respectively. This research will
compare the utility of estimating LAI with the adjusted version of NDVI
for the alpine treeline ecotone in Glacier National Park, Montana, the
site of previous research and in-situ data collection (Walsh 19xx), by
directly comparing LAI with reflectance measured at forest stands using
regression techniques.
Indirect
measures of canopy structure are based on the close coupling between radiation
penetration and canopy structure. The measurement of the fraction of sky
visible through the canopy (Gap Fraction) at various angles is an approach
that is used in remote sensing studies (Ross and Myneni 1990). The LAI
Plant Canopy Analyzer, to be used in this research, employs mathematical
techniques for deducing foliage density and angle distribution from measurements
of gap fraction (Wells and Norman 1991). The device consists of an optical
sensor and control box. The sensor incorporates fisheye optics to project
a hemispheric image onto five silicon detectors, arranged in concentric
rings. The sensors also contain an optical filter to restrict sensed radiation
to wavelengths below 490 nm, in order to minimize the contribution of radiation
that had been scattered by foliage. The control box records the sensor's
data and performs the necessary calculations for determining LAI and the
mean inclination angle of the foliage.
The
technique combines a measurement of sky brightness from a leveled sensor
above the canopy with a second measurement taken beneath the canopy with
the sensor again viewing skyward. The ratio of each ring's signal (below
to above) is then assumed to be equivalent to the canopy's gap fraction
at the ring's viewing angle. In practice, multiple below-canopy measurements
are taken to achieve a suitable spatial average for the measurement site.
Multiple below-canopy measurements are combined by averaging the logarithms
of the computed gap fraction after Lang and Xiang (1986). Above canopy
measurements in tall forest canopies can be made through (a) measurements
in large nearby clearings linked to below canopy measurements in the target
canopy or (b) a unit and data logger attached to a tower or to an adjacent
tree for above canopy measurements. Gap fraction is converted to LAI and
mean inclination angle in the control box using a method similar to Lang
(1987).
LAI
measurements will be collected in three specific situations: (a) using
the plant community classification, developed by Townsend and Walsh (1997)
and derived from a Landsat TM time-series for the study area, LAI measures
will be calculated at approximately 30 sites within each community type.
A distribution of derived LAI measures will be developed and statistically
summarized; (b) using GPS devices, field plots established in the study
area by Townsend and Peet will be relocated and LAI measures will be derived
and additional floristic information collected (e.g. tree ring data, tree
height, canopy size) where appropriate; and (c) additional sites will be
defined for LAI and floristic information for targeted species and at random
locations. In addition to the LAI at point locations, a continuous surface
of LAI measures will be derived through use of satellite spectral responses,
from sites not used to initialize the vegetation simulations. Canopy LAI
will be determined by calibrating the Landsat TM data with the field-measured
LAI, following the methods of Nemani et al (1993).
LAI
measurements will be collected in three specific situations: (a) using
the plant community classification, developed by Townsend and Walsh (1997a,
1998b) and derived from a Landsat TM time-series for the study area, LAI
measures will be calculated at approximately 30 sites within each community
type. A distribution of derived LAI measures will be developed and statistically
summarized; (b) using GPS devices, field plots established in the study
area by Townsend (1997) and Rice and Peet (1997) will be relocated and
LAI measures will be derived and additional floristic information collected
(e.g. tree ring data, tree height, canopy size) where appropriate; and
(c) additional sites will be defined for LAI and floristic information
for targeted species and at random locations. In addition to the LAI at
point locations, a continuous surface of LAI measures will be derived through
use of satellite spectral responses, from sites not used to initialize
the vegetation simulations. Canopy LAI will be determined by calibrating
the multi-temporal Landsat TM data with the field-measured LAI, following
the methods of Nemani et al (1993).
The
Spatial Analysis Lab, Department of Geography, University of North Carolina,
directed by Stephen J. Walsh, has recently been expanded through the development
of a Spectral Field Lab. Available equipment (see facilities statement
for UNC-CH) includes: Portable Spectroradiometers (measures the spectral
properties of leaves by measuring their reflectance and transmittance across
a range of selected wavelengths, visible through the NIR); Plant Canopy
Analyzer (calculates LAI, foliage density, and other canopy structure attributes
from radiation measurements, as well as the fraction of the sky visible
from beneath the canopy); Portable Laser Leaf Area Meter (measures reductions
in leaf area associated with drought, insect damage, or phenological variations
in plant stages); and Data Loggers (stores downloaded climate data at stations
and other in-situ data collected in the field). Such equipment will be
used in this project for the calculation of LAI and light extinction coefficients
for community types and sample sites.
|