Funded by The Nature Conservancy
"Vegetation, Geomorphology, and Hydroclimatology of the Lower
Roanoke Floodplain, North Carolina: A Remote Sensing and GIS Perspective"
Stephen J. Walsh1, Philip A. Townsend1, Charles E.
Konrad1,
David R. Butler1, Robert K. Peet2
1
Department of Geography, 2Department of Biology
University of North Carolina
Introduction
Floodplain ecosystems are very sensitive to
perturbations in the hydrologic regime, so that human impacts such as the regulation of
river discharges may greatly effect the terrestrial ecology of floodplain habitats.
Specifically, vegetation dynamics on floodplains are closely associated with the
hydroperiod regime, which is defined as the extent, duration, and timing of inundation on
a floodplain (Sharitz and Mitsch 1993). Species composition, productivity, and
regeneration vary in response to complex interactions between river flow
and floodplain geomorphology. However, hydroperiod regimes are neither consistent from
year to year nor regular over the course of one year. These inconsistencies are of crucial
importance to the ecology of the floodplain, because the timing of floods and hydrologic
droughts affects seedling establishment and survivorship
(Visser and
Sasser 1995). Therefore, an understanding of the seasonal timing and expected recurrence
of floods and hydrologic droughts is essential to the analysis of the ecology of the
floodplain. These factors have become increasingly important to many floodplain ecosystems
such as the Roanoke River floodplain in eastern North Carolina, where the construction of
a series of dams starting in 1952 has initiated a regulated flow regime to the lower
river.
Townsend and Walsh (1997) developed a digital
elevation model (0.5-1 m vertical resolution) and derived a series of topographic surfaces
to represent the potential for inundation across the floodplain. These models were
evaluated using information derived from the analysis of satellite imagery from the
microwave sensors, JERS-1 and Radarsat (Townsend and Walsh 1997, Townsend 1997). A series
of SAR images was employed to represent the change in inundation across the floodplain
during the course of a hydrologic year (Townsend 1997). For each image, the hydrologic
record of the lower Roanoke River was examined to determine the frequency of occurrence
during the post-damming
period for the conditions
represented in the image. The results were used in conjunction with the DEM to develop a
model of a simulated hydroperiod regime for a hypothetical growing season which
experienced the conditions represented by the SAR images (Townsend 1997). In another
study, Konrad (1997) examined the hydroclimatology of the floodplain, and found that
winter/spring flooding periods have been reduced in intensity, but extended in time.
Additional analyses indicate that discharge levels in summer months have been reduced
below pre-dam levels, but that the absolute minimum discharges from the pre-dam period no
longer occur. In general, variance in discharge patterns has been reduced. This suggests
substantial changes in the spatial and temporal pattern of flooding on the Roanoke.
Study Area
The Roanoke River Bioreserve includes
some of the best remaining examples of large river alluvial ecosystems on the eastern
coast. Dams were constructed upstream along the piedmont portion of the river in the
1950s, and these have caused changes in the hydrology of the system. Specifically, water
flow has been leveled out across the year so that there is less time with either very low
or very high water levels, and more time with moderately high water (Konrad 1997).
The Roanoke River drainage basin encompasses approximately
9,666 square miles in 24 counties in North Carolina and Virginia. The Roanoke River can be
effectively divided into two parts. The upper Roanoke River, above the Roanoke Rapids Dam,
constitutes the major portion of the river drainage system (ca. 87%), and is
located within the Piedmont physiographic province, while the lower Roanoke River basin,
below the Roanoke Rapids Dam, is totally within the Coastal Plain Province (Riggs et al.
1993). The study area for this proposed project concentrates on the 13% of the Roanoke
River's drainage system below the Roanoke Rapids dam, where the river meanders more than
125 miles (200 km) from the dam to the Albemarle Sound. Flood-control influences on the
Roanoke River date to the closure of the John H. Kerr dam in Virginia in 1952.