Report of the Month
REPORT OF THE MONTH, Volume II, Number 3
MAY - JUNE 1998
- - - - -
from the North Carolina Statewide Program for Infection Control and Epidemiology
CONTENTS:
NEWS FEATURES
- Levels of Contamination
on Surgical Instruments After Cleaning
- FDA Approves New
Sterilants
LEGISLATIVE/REGULATORY NEWS
- New CDC Public
Health Service Guidelines for the Management of Health-Care Worker
Exposures to HIV and Recommendations for Postexposure Prophylaxis
QUESTION OF THE MONTH
- HIV Post-Exposure Follow-up
Requirements
ANNOUNCEMENTS COURSES FOR THE INFECTION CONTROL
PROFESSIONAL
NEWS FEATURES
LEVELS OF CONTAMINATION ON
SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS AFTER CLEANING
Sterilization of contaminated critical equipment is required to prevent
patient-to-patient transmission of pathogenic microorganisms. Surgical
instruments are considered critical items since they enter sterile tissue.
Because the level of microbial contamination on the object to be
sterilized plays such a critical role in determining the efficacy of the
overall sterilization process, researchers evaluated the microbial load on
used surgical instruments before sterilization (Rutala WA et al. AJIC
1998;26:143-145). The microbial load on used surgical instruments after
cleaning was as follows: 36 (72%) instruments 0-10 colony forming units,
7 (14%) instruments 11-100 colony forming units, and 7 (14%) instruments
>100 colony forming units. Overall, 30% of the instruments yielded no
growth on culture. Organisms contaminating the instruments included
coagulase negative staphylococcus 56%, followed by Bacillus 22% and
diphtheroids 22%. No other organism contaminated more than 4% of the
instruments.
This data demonstrated that most used non-lumened surgical instrument were
contaminated with less than 100 relatively non-pathogenic bacteria after
cleaning. Cleaning is an essential part of the sterilization process for
two reasons. First, it reduces the bioburden and enhances the reliability
of the sterilization process. Second, it reduces the levels of residual
protein and salt both of which may interfere with the efficacy of
sterilization.
FDA APPROVES NEW STERILANTS
Historically the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was the
organization in the Federal Government which registered new chemical
sterilants. There were approximately 40 formulations approved in the
United States. Following the agreement between the EPA and FDA that
sterilants and high level disinfectants that were intended for use on
medical devices would be the responsibility of the FDA, the FDA required
all such products to be cleared by the 510 (k) process. As a result there
are fewer formulations on the market. Two new liquid chemical sterilants,
Sporox® (Reckitt and Colman, NJ) and Peract20TM;
(Minntech Corp.) were recently cleared by the FDA for reprocessing medical
devices including endoscopes. Peract20TM which consists of
0.08% peroxyacetic acid and 1.0% hydrogen peroxide will also be sold under
the trade name Cidex PA (Advanced Sterilization Products). The sterilant
claim is 8 hours at 20oC and the high level disinfection claim is 25
minutes at 20oC. However, Olympus does not endorse the use of this
product on its endoscopes due to observed internal corrosion (Olympus,
Technical Bulletin, April 15, 1998). Sporox® consists of 7.5%
hydrogen peroxide. The sterilant claim is 6 hours at room temperature and
the high level disinfection claim is 30 minutes at room temperature.
Olympus did not find any functional damage to its instruments when
Sporox® was used at its recommended concentrations and time for high
level disinfection of endoscopes.
LEGISLATIVE/REGULATORY NEWS
NEW CDC PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF HEALTH-CARE WORKER EXPOSURES TO HIV AND
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POST-EXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS
On May 15, 1998, the CDC in collaboration with the National Institute of
Health and the Food and Drug Administration released new guidelines for
HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) of HCWs (MMWR Vol. 47 No. RR-7). These
guidelines include flow charts for determining risk of transmission and
recommended treatment protocols. These guidelines are similar to the
CDC's Provisional Recommendations for Chemoprophylaxis after Occupational
Exposure (June 7, 1996 MMWR Vol 45 No 22) with three exceptions. One, the
addition of an explicit statement that contamination with blood or other
potentially infectious body fluids on intact skin is not an exposure.
Second, the addition of Nelfinavir (a protease inhibitor) as a first line
drug for post-exposure prophylaxis. Third, the time to initiate PEP has
been changed from "preferably within 1-2 hours post-exposure" to
"treatment should begin within a few hours." The OSHA Bloodborne Pathogen
Final Rule requires health care facilities to follow public health service
recommendations for HIV post-exposure prophylaxis.
QUESTION OF THE MONTH
Q: Is a consent form required by North Carolina law for HIV post-exposure
follow-up of healthcare workers or persons who have a significant blood or
other potentially infectious body fluid exposure?
A: Chris Hoke, Deputy State Health Director in the Office of Legal
Assistance answered this questions as follows.
1. A consent form is not
required to be signed by the source patient for post-exposure HIV/HBV
testing.
2. Pre- and post-test counseling with the source patient is
required if the source patient is available. Further, the HIV test may be
performed on blood already available in the lab when the source is
unavailable for pre-test counseling.
3. While it is the attending
physician's ultimate responsibility to ensure that counseling is done, it
is permissible for other licensed healthcare providers (e.g. RN's) to do
the pre-test counseling with the source patient as the designee of the
attending physician.
4. For the complete state law regarding
post-exposure follow-up see NC Administrative Code 19A.0202 and .0203.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Statewide Program for Infection Control and Epidemiology (SPICE) is our
new name. This new name better describes our services as we continue to
provide consultation and education for healthcare facilities in the
state.
Dr. Andrew McBride is the new State Public Health Director for North
Carolina.
Dr. David Satcher was confirmed as Surgeon General and Assistant Secretary
for Health in February 1998. Dr. Satcher was formerly head of the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention.
Dr. Julie Gerbeding is the new director of the Hospital Infections Program
at the CDC.
Teleconference on the 1998 Guidelines for Treatment of Sexually
Transmitted Diseases will be held on Thursday, July 23, 1998, 9:00 a.m. -
4:00 p.m. Locations are Chapel Hill, Durham, Elizabeth City,
Fayetteville, Greenville, Hickory, Lincolnton, Sylva, and Winston-Salem.
There is no fee. For more information or to register, call 919-966-4032
or on the WWW go to www.sph.unc.edu/oce/
COURSES FOR THE INFECTION CONTROL PROFESSIONAL
APIC Advanced Course - September 14-17 in Charlotte, NC. (For information,
call APIC 202-296-2742.)
NEW COURSE: "Infection Control in Home Health and Hospice" will be held
September 28, 1998 at the Omni Chapel Hill Hotel.
"Infection Control Part II: The ICP as an Environmentalist" will be held
October 12-16, 1998 at the Holiday Inn in Chapel Hill.
To
subscribe to the Report of the Month, send email to spice@unc.edu
Report of the Month is also available on the home page of the Statewide
Program for Infection Control and Epidemiology at http://www.unc.edu/depts/spice/
The Statewide Program for Infection Control and Epidemiology (SPICE) is
funded by the General Assembly of North Carolina to serve the State.
SPICE is not a regulatory agency but provides education and consultation
to North Carolina healthcare facilities.
Copyright 1998 North Carolina Statewide Program for Infection Control and
Epidemiology
Previous issues of
Report of the Month