![]() |
||
|
|
| Office of the Provost | Campus
Box 3000, 104 South Building
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3000 (919) 962-2198 FAX: (919) 962-1593 |
MEMORANDUM
| To: | Deans and Directors, Division of Academic Affairs
Deans and Directors, Division of Health Affairs |
| From: | Richard J. Richardson, Provost |
| Re: | Policy on Fraudulent Disclosure and Willful Nondisclosure
of
Employment Information for EPA Employees |
| Date: | December 15, 1999 |
The purpose of this memorandum is to clarify the established policy on falsification of credentials for new hires. The Policy on Fraudulent Disclosure and Willful Nondisclosure of Employment Information for EPA Employees at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill has been in existence since 1988. During our last audit, several units were discovered not to be in compliance with established procedures for verifying representations made about credentials and other qualifications pertinent to employment. In response to the auditors' concern, my office has designed standard forms (OP1, OP1a) for credentials verification. Effective January 1, 2000, the attached form OP1 should be completed for each new EPA Faculty or EPA Non-Faculty hire, and maintained in the unit's personnel file. All verifications must be completed within 90 days regardless if the position is full-time, part-time, salaried or non-salaried. In order to assure that the records of personnel actions maintained by your unit are complete, a block should be typed in on the AP-2 form in section 15 to signify that each Dean/Director acknowledges the credentials verification requirement and that the verification is underway.
The following information must be considered when verifying credentials:
If falsification of credentials is discovered after employment, the discipline imposed shall be based upon the circumstances of each case, except where the employee was determined to be qualified and was selected for a position based on false representations about credentials for the position. In that case, the employee must be dismissed.
The employee's performance in the position, whether satisfactory or unsatisfactory, should not be considered in determining the level of sanction. In every case, however, the discipline imposed must be taken in accordance with existing University disciplinary procedures.