Political Science 750: International Relations I | Mark J.C. Crescenzi |
| Class Meeting Time:Thursdays 2:00-4:45, 100 Howell Hall | Office:364 Hamilton Hall, University of North Carolina |
| Phone: 919-962-0401; Email: crescenzi@unc.edu |
Office Hours: Tuesdays 1:00-4:00 |
The objectives of this course are: (1) to understand the scope and breadth of the theoretical literature that has defined the study of international relations; (2) to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the theoretical paradigms represented in that literature; (3) to define specific research questions and issues that must be addressed by future research; and (4) to prepare students for preliminary examinations in international relations.
It is, of course, impossible to provide a comprehensive review of the entire field of international relations in a single semester. The readings and discussions in this course seek to strike a balance between traditional works that define the evolution of the field and contemporary works that highlight the development of our knowledge and possible directions for future research. Some of the materials in this course rely on technical tools (such as econometrics or formal theory). Students are not expected to be familiar with these tools prior to enrolling in the course, but will become familiar with them during the semester.
Response Papers (25% of final grade) In order to encourage active thinking about the readings and discussion in class, students will write five brief commentaries (3-4 pages, single-spaced) on the readings for a particular week. Students should seek in these notes to engage one or more themes in the works, discuss their strengths and weaknesses, and suggest future research questions facing that area of the literature. Students will sign up for their weeks at the first class meeting of the seminar. The papers will be circulated electronically to the entire class, and will be due at 9:00 a.m. on the relevant class day. You can email the entire class through the blackboard website.
Class Participation (20% of the final grade): Students will be expected to come to class fully prepared to engage in a robust, informed discussion of the readings and the problems for the field of international relations raised by the readings.
Literature or Book Review (25% of the final grade): The readings on this syllabus can only serve as a starting point from which students will engage additional important literature. Students will therefore write a literature or book review on a topic of interest to them that relates to one of the subjects addressed by this course. A book review will generally focus intensively on one or two related books; a literature review will examine the development of a theme or problem through time and a larger number of readings. Either type of analysis should be 4,000-5,000 words. Students should consult with me before selecting a review topic.
Written Final Examination (30% of the final grade): Students will take a one-day examination that will be patterned on the preliminary examinations that graduate students must pass before they may advance to the dissertation stage of the PhD program.
Papers and Citations: It is important that students cite the material that they have relied upon in writing these papers. If you have questions about when you need to provide citation for a source, please see the UNC guide on avoiding plagiarism. If you have questions about how to provide citation on your sources, please see the UNC Libraries' guide on citation formats. Use any citation format that you prefer, what is important is that you give credit to the sources you used.
The following books are required. They are available for purchase through various online sources, including ebook formats in some cases.
D. Scott Bennett and Allan C. Stam. The Behavioral Origins of War (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2004. Available as an ebook and ebook rental).
Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, Alastair Smith, Randolph Siverson, and James Morrow. The Logic of Political Survival (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2003).
Kenneth Waltz, Theory of International Politics (Addison-Wesley, 1979). Also available (cheaper) in Neorealism and Its Critics edited by Robert Keohane (Columbia University Press. 1986).
David Lake and Robert Powell, eds. 1999. Strategic Choice and International Relations.
All other readings are available online through the UNC Library. Students can obtain the readings by clicking on the links below.
Scott Bennett and Allan C. Stam. The Behavioral Origins of War. (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2004).
Dina Zinnes. 1980. "Three Puzzles in Search of a Researcher." International Studies Quarterly 23(3):315-42
Robert Dahl, "The Concept of Power." Behavioral Science 2 (2) :201-215
Kenneth Waltz, Theory of International Politics, pp. 79-128, 161-193.
Stephen Walt, 1985. "Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power," International Security, Vol. 9, No. 4 (Spring, 1985), pp. 3-43
David Axelrod and Robert Keohane, 1985. Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions. World Politics 38(1):226-254
David Lake, 2007. Escape from the State of Nature: Authority and Hierarchy in World Politics. International Security 32 (1): 47-79
Page Fortna, 2003. Scraps of Paper? Agreements and the Durability of Peace. International Organization 57(2):337-372
Alastair Smith, 1995. Alliance Formation and War. International Studies Quarterly 39(4):405-425
B. Ashley Leeds, 2003. Do Alliances Deter Aggression? The Influence of Military Alliances on the Initiation of Militarized Interstate Disputes. American Journal of Political Science 47(3):427-439
Alexander Wendt, The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory. International Organization 41:335-370
Alexander Wendt, Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization 46:391-425
Brian Frederking, 2003. Constructing Post-Cold War Collective Security, The American Political Science Review , 97(3): 363-378
J. Ann Tickner, You just don't understand: Troubled engagements between feminists and IR theorist. International Studies Quarterly 41(4): 611-32.
Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink, 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52(4): 887-917.
David Lake and Robert Powell, eds. 1999. Strategic Choice and International Relations. Chapters 1-4.
James Fearon, 1995. Rationalist Explanations for War. International Organization
James D. Fearon, 1994. Signaling versus the Balance of Power and Interests: An Empirical Test of a Crisis Bargaining Model The Journal of Conflict Resolution 38(2):236-269
Robert Powell, 2006 War as a Commitment Problem International Organization 60(1):169-203
Thomas Schelling. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. (New Haven: Yale University Press). Chapter 2 (An Essay on Bargaining).
Robert Powell, 2002. Bargaining Theory and International Conflict. Annual Review of Political Science5:1-30.
R. Harrison Wagner, 2000. Bargaining and War. American Journal of Political Science 44 (3): 469-484
Darren Filson and Suzanne Werner, 2002. A Bargaining Model of War and Peace: Anticipating the Onset, Duration, and Outcome of War American Journal of Political Science 46(4):819-837.
Branislav Slantchev, 2004. How Initiators End Their Wars: The Duration of Warfare and the Terms of Peace American Journal of Political Science 48(4):813-829
Robert Jervis, 1988. War and Misperception Journal of Interdisciplinary History 18(4):675-700.
Jack Levy, 1994. Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield <>International Organization 48(2):279-312.
Jonathan Mercer, 1997. Reputation and Rational Deterrence Theory Security Studies 7(1):100-113
Daryl Press, 2004/2005. The Credibility of Power: Assessing Threats During the 'Appeasement' Crises of the 1930's. International Security 29(3):136-169
Mark Crescenzi, 2007. Reputation and Interstate Conflict. American Journal of Political Science 51(2):382-396.
Bruce Russett and Zeev Maoz, 1993.Normative and Structural Causes of the Democratic Peace, 1946-1986. American Political Science Review, 87:624-38.
James Fearon. 1994. Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes.The American Political Science Review, 88(3):577-592
Henry Farber and Joanne Gowa, 1995. Polities and Peace International Security20:123-146.
Mark Crescenzi and Andrew Enterline, 1999. Ripples from the Waves? A Systemic, Time-Series Analysis of Democracy, Democratization, and Interstate War. Journal of Peace Research 36(1):75-94
Kenneth Schultz. 1999. Do Democratic Political Institutions Constrain or Inform? Contrasting Two Institutional Perspectives on Democracy and War. International Organization53:233-266
Katherine Barbieri. 1996. Economic Interdependence: A Path to Peace or a Source of Interstate Conflict? Journal of Peace Research 33(1):29-49
John Oneal and Bruce Russett, 1999. Assessing the Liberal Peace with Alternative Specifications: Trade Still Reduces Conflict Journal of Peace Research 36:423-442.
Erik Gartzke. 2007. The Capitalist Peace. American Journal of Political Science 51(1):166-191
Michael Ward, Randolph Siverson, and Xun Cao, 2007. Disputes, Democracies and Dependencies: A Re-examination of the Kantian Peace. American Journal of Political Science 51(3)583-601
Christopher Gelpi and Joseph M. Grieco, 2008. Democracy, Interdependence, and the Sources of the Liberal Peace Journal of Peace Research 45(1):17-37
Mark Crescenzi, 2003. Economic Exit, Interdependence, and Conflict Journal of Politics 65(3):809-832
Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, James Morrow, Alistair Smith, and Randolph Siverson. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival
Paul Collier, 2000. Rebellion as a Quasi-Criminal Activity. Journal of Conflict Research44(6):839-853 (see also the special issue of JCR 46(1),2002)
Nicholas Sambanis, 2004. What Is Civil War? Conceptual and Empirical Complexities of an Operational Definition. Journal of Conflict Resolution 48(6):814-858
Barbara Walter, 2009. Bargaining Failures and Civil War Annual Review of Political Science 12: 243-261
James Fearon, 1998. Commitment Problems and the Spread of Ethnic Conflict. In David Lake and Donald Rothchild, eds., The International Spread of Ethnic Conflict: Fear, Diffusion, and Escalation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.
Stephen Gent, 2008. Going in When it Counts: Military Intervention and the Outcome of Civil Conflicts. International Studies Quarterly 52(4):713-735
Stephen Gent, 2007 Strange Bedfellows: The Strategic Dynamics of Major Power Military Intervention. Journal of Politics 69(4):1089-1102
Alan Kuperman, 2008. The Moral Hazard of Humanitarian Intervention: Lessons from the Balkans. International Studies Quarterly 52(1):49-80.
Page Fortna, 2004. Does Peacekeeping Keep Peace? International Intervention and the Duration of Peace after Civil War. International Studies Quarterly 48(2):269-292
Andrew Kydd, 2010. Rationalist Approaches to Conflict Prevention and Resolution. Annual Review of Political Science 13:101-121
Kyle Beardsley, 2008. Agreement without Peace? International Mediation and Time-Inconsistency Problems. American Journal of Political Science 52(4):723-740
Todd Sandler, 2009. The Past and Future of Terrorism Research. Revista de Economía Aplicada 50:5-25
Navin Bapat, 2006. State Bargaining with Transnational Terrorist Groups. International Studies Quarterly 50(1):213-230
Quan Li, 2005. Does Democracy Promote or Reduce Transnational Terrorist Incidents? The Journal of Conflict Resolution 49)2):278-297
Ethan Bueno de Mesquita 2005. Conciliation, Counter-terrorism, and Patterns of Terrorist Violence. International Organization 59: 145-176.
Navin Bapat, 2011. Understanding State Sponsorship of Militant Groups. British Journal of Political Science .