Working With Piggy Bank

After a quick run through Redland to add an rdf:type to each KB document (Piggy Bank apparently doesn't like untype subjects?) I dumped the list of unpublished, unarchived docs that Adam sent into Piggy Bank. I'm continually impressed by how great an interface it is for managing the KB (screenshot). It would be cool if there were a way to more closely tie the two together. As it stands now, the process for getting RDF out of the KB is a bit cumbersome.

September 29th, 2006| Posted in RDF

One Response to “Working With Piggy Bank”

  1. on 03 Nov 2006 at 10:11 pm   Nanobot

    I've found that the utilization of a three pronged aproach to tackling the issue of unpacking RDF out of the KB is quite useful. Overall one first has to understand that there are inherently three levels of RDF. One the R level is the base or introductory level. The next, or "D" level is a step above that even in common nomanclature. Finally you have the "F" level which some have described as a highly esoteric, outside the box approach, to peeling away the layers of the virtual cucumber without damaging the seeds inside. Even in most "soft" sciences this is quite an intriguing problem.
    Word