
A discussion of how the satisfactory completion of a project followed. In signing the completion line in the workbook the scoutmaster only certifies that the project was "planned, developed and carried out" by the candidate. The completed write-up of the project report may not necessarily reveal the quality of the project and before and after pictures are not a requirement. It was felt that it is the scoutmaster's responsibility to verify the satisfactory completion of a project before signing the Eagle application, however, this apparently is not always the case.
As you know, many times there is a letter from the sponsor for whom the project is done thanking the candidate and the troop for what was accomplished, often praising them for the quality of the task performed. But neither has such a letter been a requirement up to now.
Whether such a requirement would add to the requirements for a service project (something we cannot do) was discussed. It was decided that it did not because the representative from the institution had to approve the plan, and on p.15 of the Advancement Policies and Guidelines BSA instructs the Eagle boards of review to ask the questions of who would benefit from the project and who could be contacted to verify the value of the project. This letter, which many candidates obtain anyway, will do two things: carry out the board of review's responsibility to determine the value of the project and give the sponsor an opportunity to praise the young man for his efforts and those of his peers.
Therefore, it was unanimously decided that effective 1 July 1998
Occoneechee Council policy will require a letter from the sponsor for which
the project was done, simply acknowledging the satisfactory completion
of the candidate's Eagle project. Any other comments, of course,
would be strictly up to the originator.