National Identities and the Future of Democracy, Part II:

Globalization and the Decline of Civic Commitments in New and Established Democracies

 

Wendy M. Rahn

University of Minnesota

 

Globalization--the worldwide movement of goods and services, people, and information--has created an increasingly interdependent world, the implications of which are sharply contested in the political science literature.  There are many who argue that the myriad facets of globalization pose clear challenges to the nature of state autonomy and sovereignty and that the nation-state system as we know it is being transformed in fundamental ways.  Despite all the academic chatter about globalization, however, litte research has directly examined empirically how globalization effects the orientations of individuals who reside in this “new world order.”  Instead, almost all of the large-N comparative work on globalization looks at macro-economic indicators and their role in shaping nation-state outcomes, such as economic growth, or policies, such as exchange rates or government taxation and spending, especially as these bear welfare state policies.

 

The debate within political science has largely overlooked that the future of democratic nation-states ultimately rests on how these forces impinge on the individuals who reside within their borders.  In particular, it is through the eyes of the youngest members of these polities that the future of the democratic nation-state can be glimpsed.  Using a new international data set, I show that globalization has indeed resulted in substantial “denationalization” in many of the world’s democracies.   The reduced importance of the nation-state as an object of attachment has problematic consequences, not just for commitments to conventional democratic virtues, such as being informed or voting in national elections, but also for orientations that are deemed central to so-called “post-national” or global citizenship.  The exhaustion of the political project of the democratic nation state, therefore, has not made the world safer for democracy, contrary to the hopes of many global cosmopolitans.