The Society
Portraits: Talk Made Before Phi Society
November 14,
1946
By Mrs. Albert
Coates
[Gladys Hall
Coates]
Several
years ago I began researching in the old records of the University with the
purpose of tracing the development of student government on this campus. The
suggestion for this subject of study came from my husband, who, as director of
the Institute of Government was interested in student government. He conceived
of it as a real branch of government and not just child's play--a branch of government
in governing its citizens. Recalling his membership in one of these societies
and what it had meant to him as a student, he suggested that I read some of the
Society minutes in order to find whether there was any material to be gotten
from them. I soon became engrossed in these records, and found material not
only relating to the subject which had been the original reason for our
research but all sorts of additional interesting and fascinating material
relating to campus life of the early years and continuing on through to this
century. Indeed, it was in reading minutes and letters and other materials of
the DI and Phi that I first became interested in the portraits which have been
collected by succeeding generations of students.
All
of the portraits in the recent exhibition shown at Person Hall Art Gallery were
collected by your historic organizations, founded in 1795, the opening year of
the University. These early Societies, together with their varied activities
such as founding libraries, conducting debates, ad governing the campus
generally, showed an early interest in the arts. In this they were encouraged
by their alumni. A letter written to the Philanthropic Society in 1832 by an
alumnus reads:
"It occurs to me too that the Society may be instrumental
in disseminating some correct ideas of Architecture and Sculpture and Paintings
and Engravings--fine Arts that are but little understood in North
Carolina."
Society interest in the Arts centered around the
collections of portraits of their famous alumni and other distinguished
Americans. So early as 1821 we find a resolution in the Philanthropic Society:
"That such regular members as have attained to
considerable eminence of which Society shall be judge, be requested to present
their portraits to Society."
The
great company of portraits in the Society Halls, indicates the response of
eminent men to this invitation.
The
following letter, written by Francis Lister Hawks who was graduated from this
University in 1815 and who became one of the most distinguished clergymen of
his time, illustrates this response. The letter is headed
New
York City
March
22, 1838
Gentlemen,
I have received your kind letter communicating a
resolution of the Society expressive of he wish to possess my portrait. I can
truly say that I have never received any compliment which more touched the
sensibilities of my nature than has this request of yours. Time has not
obliterated the society from my memory or my affections, and as I owe it much
for benefits derived from a participation in its exercises, it is most grateful
to my feelings to find that in the opinion of my fellow members, I have in some
degree at leas, made myself worthy of this expression of the Society's regard.
If the possession of the portrait will afford you any pleasure, to me it
will always be a source of honest pride that you thought so well of me as to
ask for it. I shall deem it an honor to know that the literary institution to
which in boyhood I belonged has thought the memory of my features worth
preserving. I will therefore sit with pleasure for you. The artist whom I
select is Mr. Henry Inman of this city. Mr. Inman is (in my opinion) without
equal in this country and indeed I may add that among the works of living
portrait painters in England, I saw none better than I have seen from Mr.
Inman's pencil. He paints Character as well as features and from him you
will obtain not only a correct likeness but also a very fine specimen of art. I
saw him yesterday and he entered at once with much enthusiasm into your views,
saying that he would be prompt to execute the commission.
With most affectionate wishes for the prosperity of
the Society, and a very grateful sense of the honour done me, which I beg of
you to communicate to the members for me, I am very sincerely,
Your
friend and fellow member
Francis
L. Hawks
A
president of the United States, who was another loyal society member, sat for
his portrait to the most eminent artist of his day at the request of his
society. President James K. Polk records in his diary:
Thursday, 20 May, 1847. --Having some weeks
ago yielded to the request of the Dialectic Society of the university of North
Carolina to sit for my portrait, which they wished to obtain for their debating
Hall, Mr. Sully, the celebrated artist of Phila., whom the Society had engaged
to paint (it), called this morning, and commenced the portrait. I gave him a sitting of 1and 1/2 hours.
Judge Mason, the Secretary of the Navy, also gave him a sitting for his portrait
which he is taking for the Philanthropic Society of the University of North
Carolina. We both sat in the red parlour above stairs in the President's House.
Judge Mason was a member of the Philanthropic, and I was a member of the
Dialectic Society when we were at College."
These
portraits were executed just before the visit of the President and his
Secretary of the Navy to the university for the Commencement of 1847.
It
was in this year that the Phi Society asked for the portrait of Dr. Elisha
Mitchell who was for so many years a member of this faculty. Dr. Mitchell at
first declined the honor giving as his reason that he felt the Society should
build up its library and other collections rather than spend its money on
portraits.
The
next year however he relented and wrote
University
of N. Ca. May 26, 1848
To Messrs
W. A. Jenkins
T. J. Person
G. Washington
Gentlemen,
I could not but be gratified by your communication
announcing a resolution of the Philanthropic Society, that it be proposed to me
to have my portrait taken, and placed with those of the many distinguished men
which already decorate your hall."
It is known to you that when a year ago, the same
proposal and offer were so kindly made on the part of the Society, they were
respectfully declined for reasons then stated. It has occurred to me since,
that although my portrait may not be entitled to a place amongst those of the
distinguished men that are already there, yet there is one reason, why I should
now accept of the honour that is proposed to me-the same that influences the
father of a family, even though having no pretensions to eminence as a man--to
leave his portrait to his children.
I have now been connected with the University of N.
Ca. For a little more than thirty years, and with all the faults and follies of
which I am conscious, I cannot resist the evidence that is continually
presented to me, that there are many men in North Carolina, to whom it would be
agreable (sic) to have preserved some memorial of their old instructor, when
his heart shall have become a clod of the valley.
The
following letter from a man who was a student in this University in the class
of 1805, who was the first United States Senator from the State of Alabama, was
Minister to France, and later elected Vice-President of the United States sums
up the depth of feeling which these eminent men had for their Societies.
Gentlemen:
The estimation in which I am held by the members of
the Philanthropic Society, as evidenced by their request, will ever be a source
of pride and gratification. To sustain the honor and advance the prosperity of
that Institution, constituted at one period of my life, the strongest feeling
of my nature; it entwined itself around every fiber of my heart, and stimulated
all my energies. Time and diversified pursuits have weakened but not
extinguished that feeling. I still exult in the success of the White Badge; nor
in the palmy days of Rome's power and grandeur did the "I am a Roman Citizen"
command more of confidence and respect, that "I am a Member of the
Philanthropic Society" does for me. It has been, is, and I trust ever will
be a sure guarantee of honor and moral worth.
I comply with great pleasure with the request of the
Society, shall sit to the best artist here; and so soon as the painting is
finished transmit it by the most secure conveyance which can be obtained.
With the highest respect,
I
am Gentlemen
Your
obedient servant
William
R. King
A
circular sent out to alumni by the Dialectic Society in the 1830's, requesting
funds for building a larger and grander hall gives the setting which the
Society portraits were hung:
. . .we now
have an extensive library, believed to be equal to any in the Southern States--a
Hall of respectable dimensions--rich Damask Curtains, from the looms of France,
are suspended from window arches--the floor is spread with neat carpeting--from
the walls hang portraits of various state worthies, like guardian genii of the
place, looking with complacency on the efforts of the young hope of the State .
. .
. . .should we succeed in rearing a Hall of suitable
size and proportions, we should not only expect to see a rapid addition to our
present number of volumes, but our walls covered with portraits, and our niches
filled with busts of North Carolina's distinguished sons.
As
you know the Society libraries referred to in this letter were united in the
1890s with the University library and became the nucleus for our great library
of today. Except for books in special collections all University library books
bear the names of the two societies in recognition of this union.
The
University is justly proud of the Society portraits and in 1942 Chancellor
House approved a generous appropriation of funds to bring to the campus Dr.
Arthur E. Bye of Princeton, an authority on the science of art restoration. Dr.
Bye undertook the restoration of the portraits, many of which had fallen into a
tragic state in the more than 100 years since some of them had been painted.
I
remember the terrible sight of the portraits of Hawks and Ruffin. One eye of
the Hawks portrait had been obliterated and the forehead of the Ruffin portrait
was fearfully torn. I remember making a search for other likenesses of these men
so that Dr. Bye might have something to aid him in making these restorations.
Such a splendid piece of work did he accomplish that these were two of the
portraits requested for hanging in the University library.
Some
of the most distinguished American artists are represented in University
portraits:
The
Di portrait of William R. Davie was painted by Charles Willson Peale in 1826.
The
Phi portrait of Benjamin Franklin by William Dunlap in the same year.
The
Phi portrait of Francis Hawks by Henry Inman in 1838.
The
portraits of James K. Polk and John Y. Mason, as we have said, by Thomas Sully.
The
portrait of John C. Calhoun as a young man is by Chester Harding, a fact which
Dr. Bye discovered in the course of his work. This is not a Society portrait
and it hangs in the Law Building.
The
portrait of James C. Dobbin, perhaps the most valuable of the portraits belongs
to this Society and was painted by Eastman Johnson in 1856.
The
University is fortunate in possessing some of the best work of William Garl
Brown who has been called the Sully of the South. He painted three generations
of North Carolinians and the University has seventeen of his canvasses. Several
of these are hanging in this hall.
One
of these is the portrait of General Bryan Grimes. I have a copy of a letter
signed by two future governors of North Carolina, Charles B. Aycock and Locke
Craig, who as committee members of your Society solicited this portrait from
General Grimes.
Dr.
Bye, while in this State, wrote a very interesting and illuminating article on
the University portraits which should be of interest to all of you. You will
find it in the December issue of the Alumni review Magazine for 1943-44.
Before
closing I want to congratulate you on accepting along with the Di the offer of
the University Library to exhibit three portraits from each Society. Dr. Rush
plans to exhibit them in a most favorable part of the library where they will
be seen by many persons--visitors to the University as well as students. With
appropriate cards indicating the career and services of each portrait subject
and an added notation showing the loan by the respective Society, both campus
and visitors will become more and more conscious of the historic position of
the Societies and the University's heritage.
I
have told your president that I shall be glad to meet with any committee he
shall appoint, or any volunteers, and help you re-arrange a few of the
portraits. Some small changes could be made that would greatly enhance your
hall. The larger portraits should be given more space, whereas the smaller ones
might be hung somewhat in the manner of the portraits at the back of his room.
May
I suggest that one of the best things for keeping the identity of your
portraits would be for a committee to go to Memorial Hall and search out
memorial tablets, which will probably be there for many of your portraits.
Typewritten copies of these placed next to the respective portraits in this
hall would furnish a guide not only for your college generation but for those
generations to follow. It is a great pleasure to be with you this evening and I
shall always be happy to help you in anyway I can.
What follows are
Mrs. Coates'
typescript notes, etc.
bound in with
the talk to the Phi
November 14,
1946
Hall of the Philanthropic Society
University of North Carolina
Chapel
Hill, N.C.
Febry 17th 1880
Gen
Bryan Grimes
Washington, N.C.
Dear
Sir,
The
Philanthropic Society, through us, its committee, does itself the honor to ask
you for your portrait, with which to adorn the walls of our hall.
We
hope you may find it in your power and convenience to comply with the request.
Very Respectfully,
Your Ob't Servants
James Pender
C. B. Aycock
Locke Craig
Special Committee
Washington N.C.
Feb
21st 1880
Gentlemen
Your very kind letter requesting my
"portrait on behalf of the Philanthropic Society" came duly to
hand--which request will be cheerfully complied with when the services of a
competent artist can be procured and steps shall be taken to the effect that
purpose at an early day. Upon its completion I will forward direct to you.
Congratulating
you upon the revival of the Society, and with my best wishes for her continued
prosperity
I am very
truly
Your
obt svt
Bryan
Grimes
Messrs.
James Pender
C. B. Aycock Committee
Locke Craig
Graham
N.C. - April 6th 1880
Genl. Bryan Grimes
My
Dear Sir
Your
letter dated Washington N.C. March 30th - reached me two or three
days since--The letter you wrote me at Washington City D.C. was received and
answered at the time- and I have often wondered why I did not get any reply to
it-I am now satisfied that it never reached its Destination - I should be happy
to make a copy of your portrait for you. The price would be $175 '' I may go to
Wilmington from her, by about the last of this week, and if I should remain
there long enough-could execute the picture for you there. The original could
be sent to me from Raleigh by Exprefs and as soon as I have done with it, could
easily be returned to Raleigh - and the Copy to Chapel hill or where ever you
might direct - When I get to Wilmington and see how long I am likely to remain
there, will write you, so that you can avail yourself of the opportunity-should
you conclude to have the copy made- Hoping that yourself and family are well-
I am very respectfully
Wm. Garl Browne
15
Vernon Row Washington City
May
6th 1880
Gen.l
Bryan Grimes
My
Dear Sir
I
received a letter from you Dated March 30th - a few days before I
left Graham, and answered it promptly- On my return home I found two letters
from you, at my studio, one of Feby 21st the other March 22nd.
I hope you have received my last from Graham, I should be pleased to paint the
Copy of your Portrait. You had better have it taken out of the gilt frame and
packed in a light box just large enough to hold it- and sent to me Exprefs
Directed to me at 15 Vernon Row Penna Ave Washington City D.C> - and I will
execute the work immediately - and ship as you may direct. The price will be
two hundred dollars - you say that your fathers portrait has cracked - If so I
will repair it for you without charge, and you could have it put in the same
box with your own picture - and I will return it to you with the other
pictures- You had better notify me by mail as the time of the Shipment- and on
arrival I will acknowledge receipt. I expected to have gone to Wilmington from
Graham, but being unexpectedly called back to Washington, had to change plans-
or I could have executed your order before leaving N.C. I am sorry that you had
so much trouble in getting answers to your letters. Hoping that this will reach
you.
I am yours
truly & respectfully
Wm. Garl.
Browne
Arlington House Washington D.C.
May 18th 1880
Genl. Bryan Grimes
My Dear Sir
I wrote you from Graham N.C. immediately on receipt
of your letter - and I also wrote you on my arrival home in this City. I have
not as yet heard anything from you, like my former letter - I now write again.
I stated that I should be pleased to paint the copy of your portrait - and hat
the price would be two hundred Dollars - and gave directions for packing and
shipment - viz- a light box just large enough to hold it - and ship to me by
Exprefs 15 Vernon Row Pennsylvania Av Washington D.C. If this should reach you
please let me hear from you
Respectfully Wm Garl Browne
15 Vernon Row Washington D C -
Wm Garl Browne Aug 7 1880
P. Cowper Esqr
My dear Sir
Your Postal Card received - I have no as yet heard
from Genl Grimes - The picture is finished and ready for Shipment - Please
inform the Genl that I am awaiting his instructions -
Yours truly & respectfully
Wm Garl Browne
Washington N.C.
August 12th 1880
W. Garl Brown Esq
Washington City
D-C-
Dear Sir
Your letters forwarded through Cowper to hand.
When the portrait is completed please put in
suitable frame, and put on the back of the canvafs - in small letter -
"Bryan Grimes - Maj Genl Provincial Army of the Confederate States"
and your own name as Artist and have fixed & addressed to "Philanthropic
Society Chapel hill - care of Mefs James Pender- C. B. Aycock- Locke Craig-
Committee - and prepay the freight by Exprefs at same time notify this
Committee that you have by my request shipped the box to their addrefs - Send
the original portrait back to Raleigh. Cowper will send your bill for it on to
me.
I will not insult you by asking if the Portrait is
well done for I know otherwise it could not come out of your hands
Very truly yours
Bryan Grimes
University
Of
North Carolina
Chapel Hill, N.C. Sept 5 1880
Dear Sir: -
On the absence of our Committee, James Pender, C. B.
Aycock, and Locke Craig, I am empowered and directed by the Philanthropic
Society to write to you informing you of the receipt of Gen. Bryan Grimes'
portrait. It arrived here on last Thursday, being preceded by your letter a day
or two; it was in good condition having apparently experienced no damage en
route and now graces the walls of our Society Hal. Assuring you of the
satisfaction of the Society as to the condition of the portrait on its arrival
and thanking you for your kind trouble in writing, I have the honor to be
Your
Humble Servant
A.
S. Grandy
15 Vernon Row Washington D.C. Sept 10th 1880
Mrs. Grimes
Dear Madam
Enclosed I send you a letter from the Philanthropic
Society at Chapel Hill, acknowledging receipt of Genl Grimes portrait - I
thought you would like to hear of its safe arrival 0 and at the same time, I
take the liberty of sending you my Bill, made out in the proper form, as the
one I sent to Mr. Wm. Grimes was a mere Memorandum without any heading. You can
send me an Exchange on the North for the amount -
Very respectfully
Wm Carl Browne
15 Vernon Row - Washington D.C. Sept 10th
1880
Mrs. Charlotte E. Grimes
To Wm. Garl Browne
To painting Portrait of Genl Bryan Grimes 200
To frame for -Do…………………………. 035.00
To Box & packing ……………………….. 003.50
To Exprefs charges - prepaid ……………. 008.25
$246.75
Letter From Francis Hawks to
the Phi Society
New
York, Mar. 22nd, 1838
To
a Committee of the Philanthropic Society
Gentlemen,
I
have received your kind letter communicating a resolution of the Society
expressive of he wish to possess my portrait. I can truly say that I have never
received any compliment which more touched the sensibilities of my nature than
has this request of yours. Time has not obliterated the society from my memory
or my affections, and as I owe it much for benefits derived from a
participation in its exercises, it is most grateful to my feelings to find that
in the opinion of my fellow members, I have in some degree at leas, made myself
worthy of this expression of the Society's regard. If the possession of the
portrait will afford you any pleasure, to me it will always be a source
of honest pride that you thought so well of me as to ask for it. I shall deem
it an honor to know that the literary institution to which in boyhood I
belonged has thought the memory of my features worth preserving. I will
therefore sit with pleasure for you. The artist whom I select is Mr. Henry
Inman of this city. Mr. Inman is (in my opinion) without equal in this country
and indeed I may add that among the works of living portrait painters in
England, I saw none better than I have seen from Mr. Inman's pencil. He paints Character
as well as features and from him you will obtain not only a correct likeness
but also a very fine specimen of art. I saw him yesterday and he entered at
once with much enthusiasm into your views, saying that he would be prompt to
execute the commission. As to his terms, I must refer you to him. He is very
constantly employed and commands his own prices for his work, but he is
desirous of executing this, and I therefore think you will obtain from him the
work on terms as favourable as he ever grants. You had better write to him without
delay, as both he and I are so much occupied that the more time we have the
better.
We
will commence the picture without delay, and will not have proceeded so far
before he hears from you, as to lose the opportunity of making it conform to
your wishes. Should you find on corresponding with him that the expense greatly
exceeds your anticipations allow me in all frankness to say that I shall not
feel hurt if you countermand your order. The honour (done) me is in your
request and that I shall ever feel. I believe (without knowing much about it)
that for a portrait of the size you mention Mr. Inman's lowest price is $200
and the frame will cost you something. Of all this however you will get more
satisfactory information from him.
With
most affectionate wishes for the prosperity of the Society, and a very grateful
sense of the honour done me, which I beg of you to communicate to the members
for me, I am very sincerely,
Your
friend and fellow member
Francis
L. Hawks
Letter
From William R. King to the Phi Society
Washington City
4th April 1838
Gentlemen:
I
write you from a sick chamber; having been confined for some time by severe
indisposition, from which I am but slowly recovering. This will I trust
satisfactorily account for my not having returned an earlier answer to your
kind and flattering letter. The estimation in which I am held by the members of
the Philanthropic Society, as evidenced by their request, will ever be a source
of pride and gratification. To sustain the honor and advance the prosperity of
that Institution, constituted at one period of my life, the strongest feeling
of my nature; it entwined itself around every fiber of my heart, and stimulated
all my energies. Time and diversified pursuits have weakened but not
extinguished that feeling. I still exult in the success of the White Badge; nor
in the palmy days of Rome's power and grandeur did the "I am a Roman
Citizen" command more of confidence and respect, that "I am a Member
of the Philanthropic Society" does for me. It has been, is, and I trust
ever will be a sure guarantee of honor and moral worth.
I
comply with great pleasure with the request of the Society, shall sit to the
best artist here; and so soon as the painting is finished transmit it by the
most secure conveyance which can be obtained.
With
the highest respect,
I am Gentlemen
Your Obd Svt
William R. King
Letter from J. Y. Mason to
the Rev. Wm Green
Washington.
April 23 1847
My
dear Sir.
A
few weeks since a committee of the Dialectic Society addressed to the President
a letter asking that the would sit to an artist, and have his portrait taken to
be placed in the Hall of the Society. About the same time a similar
communication was made to me, by a committee of the Philanthropic Society, with
a similar request. They young gentlemen of each committee desired the artist
should be selected here, and the bill sent to them for payment.
We
acknowledge with sensibility the honor, which has been conferred upon us, by
the literary Societies to which we respectively belonged when students at the
university, and are anxious that the portraits, shall be painted by a competent
artist, but without excessive encroachment on the funds which the Societies
collect and apply to the noble purposes of advancing the objects of their institution.
At
the request of the President, I made enquiry as to the best artist, and believe
that the elder Sully is the best of his profession. Mr. Dallas, Vice president,
kindly wrote to him, and I enclose a note from him, with a memorandum from Mr.
Sully.
I
have mislaid the letter which I Received from our Society, and do not remember
the names of the committee. Will you do us the favor to consult with the
Committees of the two Societies, and ask them if they approve the artist, to
select from his memorandum the description of portrait which they desire, of
the president and myself respectively -And write to me- We hope that they will
not desire one of those, to which Mr. Sully attached so high a price- but we
wish the gentlemen to make the selection, as they will readily appreciate my
delicacy on the subject.
Very
Respy. & truly
Yr
friend
J.Y.
Mason
Revd.
Wm. M. Green
Chapel
Hill
University
of N. Ca. April 20th 1847
To
Messrs
J.
J. Pettigrew Committee of Correspondence
of the Philanthropic Society
A.
Alston
J.D.
Myrick
Gentlemen
I
could not but be otherwise than gratefully affected by the communication
received from yourselves as Committee of Correspondence conveying in the name
of the Society an invitation to have my own portrait (however unworthy of such
honour) added to these of the distinguished men that are already in their hall.
I duly appreciate the value of this token of respect and kind feeling the
acceptance of which however I must for the present decline.
The
compliment to Judge Mason was in any case appropriate; and under the
circumstances particularly necessary and graceful, and I hope he may accede to
your wishes in this respect.
But
there are a number of spacious alcoves to be so filled with books and other
matter connected with science and the arts that may not offend the eye of
strangers who may visit us by an appearance of emptiness and poverty. A single
portrait would do little towards filling the vacuity and with the addition of
that of Judge Mason there will with the portraits and busts now on hand, be a
very decent shewing in that line.
It
is known to the members of the Society that amongst the remains of ancient art
that have been preserved to us are certain statues which are the admiration of
all who behold them. Some of them, though very heavy articles; if offered for
sale would be promptly purchased by the sovreigns (sic) of Europe for their
weight in gold.
The
originals we cannot hope to possess, but copies of them in plaster of great
accuracy and beauty are furnished at very moderate prices. That they are not
mere worthless and contemptible toys is sufficiently indicated by the fact that
a collection of them was thought worthy of being presented many years since to
the Academy of Fine Arts in the City of New York by Buonaparte - which as well
as the autograph which accompanied them is still there. Two or three of these
cats judiciously selected would occupy and fill one of the alcoves gracefully -
and at small cost - they would also be a means of improvement (sic0 to the persons
who should look upon them by conveying an accurate idea of what the ancient
statues were.
Collections of shells, minerals and other things of
the kind, might be made to meet in part a necessity which at present exists and
may perhaps continue for some years. With reference to these things if the
ideas here thrown out shall be deemed at all worthy of attention I may be of
some use to the society and I need hardly add that I shall be happy to further
their views in any way that is in my power.
Please
accept gentlemen my thanks to yourselves personally for the kind and obliging
terms in which you have been please (sic) to communicate to me the resolution
of the Society and believe me
Respectfully
yours,
E. Mitchell
Portrait of William R. Davie
[Not the one owned by the
Societies]
Made
in Paris during summer of 1800. Davie died Nov. 8, 1820 (according to two
newspaper notices of the time.)
Who
made the portrait?
At
first it was thought to be the work of M. Fauret de Saint Memin who did a great
many portraits in America but art critics agreed this is not his work.
The
work of Gilles Louis Chretien
Gilles
Louis Chretien, a French musician, was born at Versailles in 1754. In 1787, he
invented a machine called the "Physionotrace," with which he took
portraits in profile from life, which were reduced to silhouettes, usually by
Fouquet, and then engraved in quatint by himself. Many of these are of great
interest on account of the celebrity of the persons represented,
"L'Incorruptible Robespierre," Mirabeau, and Marat, being among the
hundreds which he produced. Edme
Queneday was at first associated with him, but Chretien afterwards worked
alone. He died in Paris in 1811. (From Bryan's Dictionary of Painters and
Engravers. P. 292, (1903))
Davie's
career. General Davie resigned Governorship of N.C. in 1799 to accept an
appointment by Pres. John Adams on a commission to France. Portrait made in
1800.
A.
J. Parsons, late Chief of the Division of Prints in Library of Congress an
authority said, "there were only two portraits by Gilles Louis Chretien in
America."
Portrait
made 11 years after helping found UNC (1789). Exact measurements, etc.
This
and other information from UNC Record, 1921-22, frontispiece. Other portrait by
same artist in America.
Letter from Wm Garl Brown to
Louis Bane (Di)
Raleigh
N.C. June 8th, 1859
Dear Sir,
Your letter of the 6th inst enclosing
check for two hundred and two Dollars, amount due me for painting portrait of
Hon. W. P. Mangum and also ordering portrait same size of Dr. Phillips reached
me this morning. I did agree with Mr. Pinnix to order a frame for the Judge's
picture, and will also order one for the portrait of Dr. Phillips as you
suggest. I think they will cost about forty five dollars each and can be
delivered in about three or four weeks from the date of this. I will instruct
the frame maker to ship to you at Chapel Hill and the Bull by Mail to you.
Respectfully
You obt sert
Wm Garl Brown
Louis Bane Esqr
Chapel Hill N.C.
Letter from Sully to John Y.
Mason
Philadelphia
June 21 1847
Honorable J.Y. Mason
Dear Sir
Just as I was about to leave for providence, your
letter arrived.
I have iven the requisite orders about the frames,
and your request concerning the protraits shall be attended to.
I will subjoin to this, my account.
Very respectfully
Your obt sert
Thos Sully
Honorable J.Y. Mason
Dr. to Thos Sull
Portrait of His excellency James K. Polk
President of the United States $300
Portrait of the Honble J.Y. Mason
Sectary (sic) of the Navy of the United States $300
Frames made by Mr. Earle $80
Packing case, Porterage, etc. _$3__
$683
Freight to Washington 4
Letter
from John Y. Mason to Phi Soc.
Washington, Aug 7th 1847
Gentlemen,
Mr.
Sully sent to my care, the portraits of the President and of myself which (he)
had painted for the two societies at the University of North Carolina--agreably
to your request, I desired him to send to me his bill, which I now forward.
John
D. Hawkins esq of Franklin, kindly took charge of the package, and I doubt not,
it has been recd in good order. Will you have the goodness to informe (sic) me,
if you and the committee of the Dialectic Society will send me , a bill for the
amount, I will pay Mr. Sully, get his receipts and send them to you and the
Committee of the Dialectic Society. I hope the portraits will realize the
expectations of the Societies. And I shall never cease to cherish the
recollection of the high honor, which has thus been conferred on me.
Very truly yr frd
John Mason
Corresponding
Com. Of the Philanthropic Society
Letter from James Bogle to
Phi Soc.
New
York 5th Oct. 1851
Dear
Sir,
Having
finished the copy of Judge Gaston's portrait, I had it framed, boxed and
shipped thro' Messrs Brown and DeRosset yesterday.
I
was unable to get a frame of the requisite width for less than $25, including
boxing, which is usually about two doll/but as it was a higher price than I had
intended giving they deducted the expense of boxing.
The
picture was pronounced by all who saw it by the original, a literal and perfect
copy - some persons who knew Judge G said that they could not distinguish
between them. The original having been painted some twenty years since,
presents rather an old fashioned look so far as the dress.
It
cannot be regarded as a specimen of any style, being totally unlike in color
and drawing.
I
trust that it will be received in good condition, and that it will give
satisfaction to the Society. You will oblige me by letting me know the opinions
of all the members.
When
the picture is opened it will be necessary to brush it gently with a silk
handkerchief to remove the dust. --if rubbed it will only adhere the more
firmly.
With much respect
Your obdt. Svt.
James Bogle
Mr.
Wm E. Barnes
University
Chapel
Hill
North
Carolina
From
James K Polk's Diary
Thursday, 20th May, 1847. Having some weeks ago
yielded to the request of the Dialectic Society of the university of North
Carolina to sit for my portrait, which they wished to obtain for their debating
Hall, Mr. Sully, the celebrated artist of Phila., whom the Society had engaged
to paint (it), called this morning, and commenced the portrait. I gave him a sitting of 1and 1/2 hours.
Judge Mason, the Secretary of the Navy, also gave him a sitting for his
portrait, which he is taking for the Philanthropic Society of the University of
N. Carolina. We both sat in the red parlour above stairs in the President's
House. Judge Mason was a member of the Philanthropic, and I was a member of the
Dialectic Society when we were at College."
Friday, 21st May, 1847. I gave Mr. Sully,
the artist, another sitting of two hours this morning. He is painting my
portrait for the Dialectic Society of the University of N. Carolina. After I
had sat for him I transacted public business . . .
Saturday, 22 May, 1847. I sat again this morning for
Mr. Sully, the artist, who is painting my portrait for the Dialectic Society of
the University of N. Carolina.
Other sittings were: May 24 and 25 when the President
entertained Mr. Sully at dinner. Pres. Polk left Washington May 28, 1847 to
attend Commencement at Chapel Hill, arrived there May 31 (he graduated June
1818, 29 years before). Prof. Mitchell was only member of old faculty left.
Letter from Thomas Sully to
J.Y. Mason
Philadelphia
May 27 1847
Judge Mason,
I have lost no time in advancing the portraits to
Chapel hill, and expect to finish them soon. Meantime as I thought frames would
be required, I have obtained an estimate of different prices, and submit them
to the society for their selection.
I have found it better to enlarge the portraits to
half-length, but I will not alter the price fixed upon --viz 300 for each
portrait.
With great respect
Yr obt sert
Thos Sully
Mr. Earles estimate
Half-length frame, plain moulding, 6 inches wide $20
Ditto -
ornamental, and 7 in. wide $32
Ditto - richly
ornamented $40
Note from G. M. Dallas to
J.Y. Mason
Dear
Sir:
Mr.
Sully's terms are somewhat higher that I had supposed: - but they are not too
high for good portraits.
If
you can consult Col. Polk, pray let me know what to write back to Mr. Sully as
soon as you conveniently can.
Sincerely yrs,
G. M. Dallas
16 Apr. 1847
Honble
John
Y. Mason etc. etc.
Letter from Artist Thomas
Sully to Phi Society Re Cost of Portraits
Honble
George M. Dallas
Dear
Sir
I
hasten to reply to your kind communication in regard to the application from
Chapel Hill College.
List
of Prices for Portraits
Head-size
20 inches by 17 $150
Bust 30 " 25 $200
Kit
Kat 3 feet by 2 fett 4 inches $300 with hands
Small
half length; 3ft8; by 2ft 10in $400
Large
half length; 4ft8; by 3 ft 8 in $500
Whole
Length; 8 ft, by 5 ft $1000
Should
my terms suit the gentlemen from North Carolina, I will visit Washington
forthwith.
With great respect
Your Obt Servant
Thos. Sully
Philadelphia
April 15th 1847