Students have misconceptions about hazing

                Junior Brad Pure looked around his fraternity house.  Everyone was smiling, dancing, and talking.  And it was all for a good cause––to raise money for charity.  This was Zeta Beta Tau’s first activity since its reinstatement in December, appropriately named “It’s About Damn Time 2.”

     Brad had come along way in the last two years. Along with eight other ZBT pledges, he had been involved in the incident that led to ZBT’s expulsion shortly after.  The evening on October 14, 1997 had begun as just another night for the primarily Jewish fraternity.  Then the scavenger hunt and “the list” were introduced.  Three former ZBT members had created this list, which contained sexist, racist, and homophobic phrases that offended nearly every group on campus, after its publication in the Indiana Daily Student.  Some items included were a picture of two women making out and a picture of “any funny looking Mexican,” along with harmless items, such as the rules for Ultimate Frisbee.  But the biggest public misconception about the list was that everyone in the fraternity was aware of it, which Brad said was not the case.  He had no part in making the list, nor did he physically see it.

When I heard what was on the list, I thought it was wrong,” said Brad “but I felt like we’d be looked down upon by our brothers if we didn’t do it.”

                That night, two cars of men were involved.  Five men were in a Ford Explorer and four were in Brad’s car, a Toyota 4-Runner.  The Explorer’s passengers took the “P” and “H” from a sign at the Kappa Alpha Psi fraternity house. However, according to Brad, the worst thing the passengers in his car did was stealing a stop sign, which all men participated in.  Brad referred to this as a typical college prank, certainly not worth the consequences that followed.  When the police arrive at 1:40 am at the corner of 4th and Bryan, the nine members were taken directly to Monroe County Jail because of the findings.  They spent the night and former ZBT president, Jason Nierman, bailed them the next morning.

                The next few days were a whirlwind of events for Brad and the eight other men.  They were given a $185 fine and 70 hours of community service.  The three men that actually wrote the list were immediately expelled from the fraternity, but this was their only punishment.

“Everyone said we got off so easy, but we really didn’t,” said Brad, “The guys that actually wrote the list didn’t get anything and we got it all…talk about injustice.”

                Dean of Students, Richard McKaig told the IDS that the ZBT incident was “as classic a case of hazing as you can get.”  However, many students would disagree with this statement because of the misconceptions they hold about hazing.  They believe that hazing must involve alcohol or humiliating initiation rituals, among other misinterpretations. “When I hear the word hazing, I think of excessive drinking and embarrassment, usually involving some sort of physical pain,” said a Non-Greek Sophomore, Sarah Schregardus.

     When a fraternity or sorority pledge enters the Greek system, they must vow to abide by the Indiana Law regarding hazing.  According to Student Ethics Director, Pam Freeman, students take this lightly and don’t understand hazing.

I think they think of hazing only in terms of paddling and physical abuse,” said Freeman, “I’m not sure they understand the emotional, sometimes psychological stuff that gets done.” 

                The Indiana University Code of Student Ethics clearly states that hazing is “any conduct which subjects another person, whether physically, mentally, emotionally, or psychologically, to do anything that may endanger, abuse, degrade, or intimidate the person as a condition of association with a group.” 

                Interfraternity Council President John Perry, who is a member of Phi Gamma Delta, emphasized that hazing can involve almost anything.  He described hazing as anything that involves demoralizing or inappropriate behavior, including, but not always alcohol usage. However, Perry also mentioned that “hazing” could be beneficial in the conducive sense. Perry explained that placing emphasis on academics, as well as friends and fun is using the technical definition of hazing for constructive purposes. He said, the goal is to build up the freshman into someone that the others would like to call a brother. According to Perry, this positive change developed because of the alcohol-rated deaths at IU recently, such as Joe Bisanz’s death in December 1998. These incidents have encouraged fraternity leaders to concentrate on positive character development.

“Because of the incidents as of late, it’s more a constructive building of character than to see who can shot gun a beer the fastest,” said Perry.

Perry emphasized the decreasing role of alcohol in fraternity initiation.  On the other hand, Ethics Director Freeman pointed out that many students don’t think hazing with alcohol is that big of a deal.  It is often inferred that hazing is part of joining the Greek system. 

“I don’t understand why guys put up with it [hazing]––the physical pain, humiliation, degradation,” said Non-Greek Schregardus, “But the thing is, no guys really complain, and the ones you do hear complain appear like wimps.  It sucks, but that’s the choice they make when they join a fraternity.” 

As Schregardus mentioned, many students commit to hazing willingly.  According to Freeman, many students believe that if a pledge gives consent, then it is okay. 

“Even if it is consensual, it is still against policy and against the law,” said Freeman, “The consensual part is why sometimes they [students] think it is okay, but it is clearly not.”

Although hazing is usually recognized and traditionalized in fraternity houses, Freeman believes hazing also affects sororities and other organizations.  However, these incidents are usually not reported or discussed as much in public. According to IFC President Perry, Greeks and particularly fraternities, often have a bad reputation because the IDS and other groups on campus tend to misconstrue them.  Perry made a reference to the Delta Chi incident in December.  The fraternity found themselves in trouble when freshman Todd Hege fell down the stairs due to hazing and alcohol.  Delta Chi was placed in a heated debate because of this incident.

“It’s not a Delta Chi thing.” Perry pointed out.  “It’s the fact that a few members were a little inebriated, but those students of Indiana University happen to be fraternity men.” 

According to Freeman, every Greek organization should understand that hazing is not allowed.  Hazing is supposed to have stopped because the national organizations have taken strong stands against hazing, which is or should be consistent throughout the Greek system.  However, hazing is still prevalent. 

“I would certainly not say it [hazing] is gone,” said Freeman, “the fact that we actually had a case that went all the way through the campus judicial system last year shows this.”

The 1998-1999 Comparative Report on Personal Misconduct states that there were five cases that went through in 95-96, none in 96-97, and six in 97-98, showing no apparent trend in the amount of cases reported. 

“It [number of cases] depends on whether anyone has the courage to speak up and take a stand behind what they say,” said Freeman.

According to Freeman, it is necessary for students to be honest and submit to immediate confession to end hazing.  She said that when reports of hazing are received that student ethics office will try very hard to get factual information, but this can be extremely difficult.  This is why it is important that students supply truthful answers to questions when these matters are investigated. 

“To get it to stop we really need people to be courageous enough to say, ‘This is what’s happening, I’m a witness to it, I’m willing to say it’ and that’s very hard,” said Freeman.

Methods of prevention and education of hazing have been addressed by Stophazing.com.  This website suggests the awareness and education of members, corrective actions, and positive programming.  All these programs are currently being applied at Indiana University, said Freeman.

To increase awareness by members, the Student Ethics Office primarily tries to ensure that the hazing policy is worded clearly and that the incidents receive a full investigation and response when hazing has been alleged.

In order to educate members, the Student Activities Office works with groups to educate about the importance of eliminating hazing.  This is primarily done through workshops for student leaders and retreats.

The purpose of the campus judicial system is to both educate the students about the problems with hazing and to hold the students accountable in a way that will stop the behavior from recurring.  According to Freeman, if individuals or groups are found responsible for hazing, any of the sanctions that are listed in the Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities and Conduct can be applied, including suspension or expulsion from the university.

Finally, positive programming for members also plays a big role in limiting hazing.  ZBT and Brad Pure will never be the same because of this approach.  After its expulsion, ZBT quickly became known as the men of 1500 N. Jordan Ave and began holding weekly diversity sessions.  These sessions consisted of the entire fraternity gathering every Sunday night and hosting speakers on different cultures from African-American to Hispanic to Asian. Brad, who is both Caucasian and Jewish hadn’t been exposed to other cultures before because of his “sheltered childhood” in a primarily Jewish suburb of Chicago.  According to Brad, these sessions made ZBT much more open-minded.

“Before the sessions we really didn’t understand other cultures, which really affected the way we saw them,“ Brad said, “The sessions definitely made me a more well-rounded person and our fraternity much more sensitive as a whole.”                                           

                Brad said that ZBT has grown up a lot in the past two years.  To this day, he has never seen the physical list.   He said the incident is all over and that is all that matters. Although it was extremely difficult for him, he gained knowledge, sensitivity, and understanding. Now, whenever he sees something wrong, he will not hesitate to say something.

“This incident opened my eyes to what is around me and made me a better person overall,” said Brad with a smile, “In that sense I don’t regret it.”