Info from West Point Fortifications Staff Ride
Note Cards 11, 12, 13, 21, 22 USMA History Department 2d Edition, March
1998
The original foritifications on Constitution Island were part of "Fort
Constitution," an elaborate plan devised by Bernard Romans, a Dutch-born
novice engineer appointed in August of 1775 by the New York government.
Romans' plan called for 5 blockhouses and several batteries in four locations.
The centerpiece of Romans' design was "The Grand Bastion," a large European-style
fortress built of stone. Unfortunately, Romans' plans
were more expensive than effective. The effort required to build
the Grand Bastion led other positions to be neglected, and review by more
experienced military engineers pointed out grave problems with Romans'
design. There were two main problems. To begin with, the unfortified
Plain atop the cliffs of West Point loomed over the Constitution Island
fortifications, offering a perfect location for an enemy's siege artillery.
Secondly, the Grand Bastion was poorly sited--while it dominated the narrowest
part of the river, only 24 of its 61 guns would be able to engage a ship
rounding the bend in the river from the south--as a result, a ship might
be able to force the passage while facing only a few salvos from
the fort's heaviest guns. While Romans sought to redress some
of the criticisms of his design, he was fired in January of 1776.
West Point Fortifications Staff Ride Note Cards 13
USMA History Department 2d Edition, March 1998
Romansí Blockhouse and Battery
ď Romansí Blockhouse
- Began in Oct 1775 and completed 11 Nov 1775
- Center of the Grand Bastion
-- mounted eight 4-pdr in upper story
-- Lord Stirling ě a log house or tower on the highest cliff,near the
water, mounted with
8 cannons, pointed out of the garret windows, and looks very picturesque.î
ď Romansí Battery
- SW curtain of the Grand Bastion, began in Oct 1775 and nearly completed
by Dec 1775
- Reported completed by Romansí replacement, CPT William Smith, on
1 Mar 1776
- 200í long
- mounted thirteen 6-pdrs, one 9-pdr
- 15 embrasures 12í apart
- 11í thick rampart, exterior face- dry stone masonry, interior face-
mortared stone, core was
stone rubble
- Parapet was probably 10í thick (normal was 12í)
- stone scarp with timber cribs filled with earth 7í deep
- 12x18í brick powder magazine in SW corner (discovered during excavation
in 1972)
Lord Stirlingí s Report (June 1776)
West Point Fortifications Staff Ride Note Cards 19
USMA History Department 2d Edition, March 1998
ď Third and final comprehensive review of early fortifications
ď Sent by rebel General Israel Putnam (in compliance with order from
George Washington) to inspect Fort Constituion
"Upon the whole, Mr. Romans has desplayed
his genius at a very great expense and to very little publick advantage.
The works in their present open condition and scattered situation are defenceless;
nor is there one good place on the island on which a redoubt may be erected
that will command the whole; however, I have marked in the plan (No. 3)
those heights which are most commanding; yet every work on the island is
commanded by the hill on the West Point, on the opposite side of the river,
within five hundred yards, where there is a level piece of land near fifty
acres i extent. A redoubt on this West Point is absolutely necessary not
only for preservation of Fort Constitution, but for its own importance
on many accounts."
ď Vulnerable to ground attack
ď Recommended some modifications of Gravel Hill and Hill Cliff batteries
The Fall of Fort Constitution, 1777
In the later stages of the 1777 Saratoga campaign, Lord Stirling's worries
about the susceptibility of the Constitution Island defenses to ground
attack were borne out. The British quickly chased the defenders away
and seized the island; upon receiving news of the American victory at Saratoga,
however, they destroyed the remaining fortifications and returned to New
York City.
When the revolutionaries returned to refortify the area, they chose
to focus on the commanding heights of West Point. Constitution Island
remained undefended until May of 1778, when Greaton's Battery was constructed
on the site of the previous Gravel Hill Battery. In September of
1778, Alexander Duportail, Washington's chief engineer, initiated the construction
Redoubts 5, 6, and 7 and the reconstruction of Marine Battery in order
to protect the eastern end of the Great Chain.