The
three forts were named for the commanders of the militia regiments that
built them--and they were batteries rather than forts.
ï Purpose: Identified by Parsons and Kosciuszko in 1778 as necessary
to protect Fort Clinton from southern approaches along the river.
Forts Meigs, Wyllys and Webb together created an integrated mutually
supporting defensive postion. All three were integrated infantry
redoubts and artillery batteries with primary emphasis on the construction
of positions to locate and fight the artillery.
Fort Meigs
West Point Fortifications Staff Ride Note Cards 38
USMA History Department 2d Edition, March 1998
Located 150m SE of Fort Wyllys and 60í lower on a steep sided spur astride
the approach to Fort Clinton to fire on ships on river or troops approaching
along road on bluff.
ï Construction (began in Apr 1778 probably completed by Aug 1778)
- ìUî-Shaped with the front at the base of the ìUî
- Front wall was strongest with battery facing south and opening to
the rear
- Primarily of earth and wood although scarps and ramparts were of
stone
- Dry masonry scarp up to 5í high with little talus
- Base of parapet 5-8í thick
- No evidence of gun platforms or embrasures today. But LíEnfantís
1780 sketch shows one
embrasure. Only foundation walls remain.
- Battery open in back
- May have attempted to connect with Fort Wyllys with parapet (140í)
- Ruins to east may have been part of the Meigs complex. 1778 sketch
map shows two small fortifications below the battery to the E of the road
on the bluff above the river. Kosciuszkoís ìRuff Mapî shows a guardhouse
and an open work at identical locations.
ï Manpower provided by Fort Wyllys.
Fort Wyllys
West Point Fortifications Staff Ride Note Cards 39
USMA History Department 2d Edition, March 1998 (Card
#1)
Wyllys appears to have been conceived primarily as an infantry fortification
from which infantry could deny the ridgeline to the enemy while conducting
sorties to protect the artillery in front of Wyllys and Meigs.
ï Construction (began in Apr 1778). Among best preserved redoubts at
West Point
- Redoubt
- Pentagonal shape with 86 yard perimeter
- One embrasure on S side to cover approach up ridge and to support
battery
- Bombproof and magazine as early as 1782
-- bombproof had 3 levels each 3í apart
-- lowest section may have been magazine, but CPT Sergentís sketch
shows it on W wall
-- magazine may still exist beneath the soil in the NW corner
- W wall was thickest (13í) and appears to be highest to protect from
artillery firing from higher ground to W and S
- Dry masonry ramparts and scarp
- Earth parapets held in place by fascines and timber
- Entry by steps through upper portion of northern rampart
- Mounted three cannon two facing E and one facing S
- Battery mounted two 18 pdrs, three 3 or 4 pdrs
- Dry masonry ramparts and scarp
- Earth parapets (102í in lengtj) held in place by fascines and timber
- Four embrasures cut in the parapets (2-SW, 2-SE)
- Used novel technique to support the wooden gun platform: stone sleepers
constructed about 2.5í high and 3í apart (instead of wooden sleepers)
- Huge epaulment built on W side (19íx55í). Surviving stonework is
at least 13í high at one point. Probably capped with timbers and fascines
filled with earth.
- Palisade and parapet may have connected redoubt with battery
ï Manpower: 170 men, entire garrison had to be present to prevent surprise
attack
ï Benedict Arnold (25 Sep 1780): ìbuilt of stone, 5í high, the Work
above plank filled with Earth, the stone work 15í, the Earth 9í thick.
-- No Bomb Proof, the Batteries without the Fort.î Later report indicates
that bombproof and battery completed by that winter.
ï Villefrance (15 Apr 1782) reports that bombproof needs 2í of earth,
inside parapet needs to be raised
4í4î higher than the banquette, south part of wall must be rebuilt,
and palisade needed to join the battery
and fort.
Fort Webb
West Point Fortifications Staff Ride Note Cards 41
USMA History Department 2d Edition, March 1998 (Card
#1)
ï Construction (No visible traces remain. . . must rely on Sergeantís
1782 sketch)
- Began in Apr 1778; 26 Jul 1778 - regiment posted on outworks, 200
men to complete in two
weeks; named after commander of the regiment that built it.
- 1782 sketch by CPT Ephraim Sergeant showed 4 embrasures, bombproof,
and magazine inside
a 134 yard perimeter (twice size of other redoubts)
- Primarily of earth and wood although scarps and ramparts were of
stone
- SW guns oriented along ridge toward Fort Wyllys; NW guns oriented
toward base of Crown
Hill and SW edge of the plain; other two guns oriented SE corner of
plain where enemy infantry would
begin their assault if advancing from the river.
- Cannons, probably two 6-pdrs and four 4/3-pdrs, mounted on raised
gun platforms and infantry
aided by raised step (banquette)
- Parapets on W and S thicker (8í) for artillery protection
- Benedict Arnold (25 Sep 1780): ìbuilt of fascines and wood, a slight
work, very dry and liable
to be set on fire, as the approaches are very easy, without defenses,
save a slight abatis.î