Discussion Forum
Guidelines
"DFs" are short writing assignments which
discuss one or two "salient" (recurrent) elements that you notice in that
day's reading (unless specified by the specific assignment). Keep your
entry focused and analytical. I may call on you to share your DF
with your group or with the class, so do the best you can. DFs will become
easier to write as the semester progresses. These observations will be
used as springboards for class discussions, exams. and papers.
Each entry must:
have a THESIS (argument)
include quotations from the text to
support your argument.
use MLA for documentation (ALWAYS INCLUDE
A WORKS CITED PAGE)
include the date and an interesting
title
12 point Helvetica; 200-250 words (unless
told otherwise).
DFs on a
NARRATIVE TECHNIQUE
These work towards sharpening your ability
to derive meaning from a text through close, critical analysis. They will
reveal your ability to:
use appropriate critical vocabulary (setting,
theme, climax, ambiguity, narrative perspective)
identify patterns and details that may uncover
meaning
express well reasoned opinions about the quality
of a work based on textual evidence
Isolate specific quotes or segments of the
story which demonstrate this technique and show how they work together
to make a point. Ask yourself:
Where does the author manipulate this writing
technique?
How does the author manipulate this writing
technique?
How does paying attention to these details
enrich our reading of this story?
How would our perception of the story change
if these details were absent?
As the semester progresses, feel free to
compare or contrast how authors use same literary technique. How do
these similarities OR differences complement each other and enrich our
understanding of the stories as a whole?
Keep in mind that while your essays must
be analytical and insightful, you can be creative. Below
are a few options.
After a discussion of setting, consider a
short proposal for on-site filming. Where would you set it? Why? Which
important historical details would you re-create? Why? How are these important
to the story?
During an analysis of character or point-of-view,
consider an analysis of one character from another character's perspective.
After an analysis of climax, consider an alternate
ending. Explain why this is necessary. What's wrong with /problematic about
the author's ending?
After an analysis of character or theme, discuss
how a character or theme relates to your experience, changes your beliefs
or attitudes, etc.
DFs using
Frames
Apply an interdisciplinary frame to sharpen
your ability to derive meaning from a text through close, critical analysis.
They will reveal your ability to discuss how concepts & theories from
various disciplines expose added insight and complicate interpretations.
-
Frame = "glasses" that only allow you to see
certain elements. Some literary frames / approaches include
-
history
-
feminism / gender studies
-
psychoanalysis
-
race / ethnic studies
-
marxism
As you know, critics derive different interpretations
of a work by analyzing the work from different frames. For example: if
you read Gilman’s "The Yellow Wallpaper" from a feminist approach, you
may decide that her behavior is the result of her husband’s oppression
/ restrictions. However, if you were to use a psychoanalytical approach,
you might argue that she suffers from post-partum depression, which leads
to her insanity. Each of these analyses would focus on different parts
of the text to prove the argument. Yet, each is valid, as long as you supply
evidence to support your interpretation.