SS: All in the Hollywood Family
Draft WS 1: Content


1.  What's the author's point?  Were you convinced? Why or why not?  (comment HERE after you've read the whole draft)
 
 
 
 

2.  As the assignment suggests, you must teach the psychological research / theories using scenes from the movie as evidence that will clarify the complex issues.

a.  Where does the author talk theory without the movie?  (designate on the draft)
b.  Where does the author talk about the movie without the theory?   (designate on the draft)
c.  Overall, how can the author more effectively begin making connections between the two? (comment HERE)
 
 
 
 

 
 

3.  List places where you think the paper needs more evidence (either theory or movie).  (designate on the draft)

4.  How has the author organized the paper?  (outline it here)  Where does the organization not "work" or where does it get confusing (you lose track of the argument)?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

5.  Considering the project's goal, why is this the BEST psychology lesson you've ever had?  What did you learn?  Why?  (comment HERE)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

6. Did it put you to sleep?  How could the "instructor" have made this lesson more valuable?  What did you already know?  Did the author(s) tell you the obvious? Did the author(s) oversimplify the issue?  How would you recommend the instructor(s) complicate / make the lesson more interesting and valuable? (comment HERE)