20th-Century Scientific Breakthroughs
(Natural Science)

Unit Description

On the verge of a new century, the scientific community has started reflecting on its accomplishments and avenues through which to pursue new scientific inquiry.  What have scientists discovered?  Which is/are the most important findings?
This unit will  introduce you to scientific inquiry, the process, and how scientists write about it.  By asking empirical questions you will use concrete, verifiable data from scientific experiments to draw conclusions about a scientific breakthrough.
Project breakdown:
Brainstorming: click here.  (The list kept growing & growing, so I gave it its own page)
Proposal
Annotated Bibliography
Article Submission for Science

Proposal

Goal: Argue what you believe scientists should designate as the "breakthrough of the twentieth century."
Audience: A panel of scientific writers putting together the January 2000 issue of Science.
Length: at least 2 full pages (500 words)
Value: 5 points

Choose a specific scientific breakthrough that interests you from the brainstorming list.  If you have another topic, please consult me first.  I urge you to choose a topic that interests you, that you want to learn about, or  with which you have some familiarity either academically or personally.  But, do not hesitate to choose a topic about which you do not know much.  The mini-research unit will help with that.

Without doing any research, argue why you think the editors should include your "breakthrough" in the 2000 issue.  Remember, since you must write an argumentative claim, scientists should disagree about whether your choice represents THE breakthrough of the twentieth century.  If they all agree, then it's not an argument, right?  Consider the following:

Annotated Bibliography

GOAL: Summarize and evaluate at least six professional articles, chapters from books, or web sites (limit 2) that address a recent natural science "breakthrough."
Audience: Those who want the most up-to date and valid scientific information, but  want summaries of the articles to determine if they should read them for their own research.
Length: 100-150 words per entry
Value: 10 points

Now that you have begun to think about your topic, you've probably recognized the gaps in your knowledge.  Time to fill them in!  Putting together an annotated bibliography will help you gather and evaluate information from current scientific research on your topic.  An annotated bibliography has three basic components:

Tips:

20th-Century Scientific Breakthroughs: Article Submission to Science

GOAL: Write an argument that presents scientific information and persuasively argues that your topic represents the the most important scientific breakthrough of the twentieth century.
Audience

Length: 4-5 pages
Value: 15 points

Your critical thinking and extensive research have made you "experts" on specific this scientific breakthrough.  Using your special insight, the empirical data you have collected, and your new and improved knowledge, write a persuasive, scientifically valid, argumentative article for Science. You should have the following:  an argumentative claim, persuasive support, logical and authoritative reasoning, and an acknowledgment of the opposition. We will mail these!

Review the basic of natural science writing in Allyn & Bacon, pp. 724-7730

A Successful Paper:


Last updated on 8/28/99.
© 1999 Deborah De Rosa