As far as following Kotler's recommended strategies, I think this case study shows that Ernst & Young's marketing strategy and implementation very closely resembles Kotler's suggestions. Earnst & Young began with the question: how do we make our consulting services (professionals with experience) more widely available to a growing range of clients? They were looking at a new marketplace: consulting for emerging market clients doing business with the tax and audit divisions of Ernst & Young. Soon, they said no to a call-in type of system, and decided upon the Internet as their delivery channel. Soon they began developing what would come to be known as Ernie and tested the service with a pilot group to identify possible service gaps, and used this information to build and improve their marketing strategy. They conducted telephone surveys and held focus groups to try to determine what possible problems or difficulties would arise in launching a tool "that had broad problem-solving capabilities." The "Ernie" brand was created to personalize the service; to make the clients feel that it was a real person consulting them, not a computer, and finally launched and introduced Ernie to current Ernst & Young customers, and to potential new customers as well as the media.
E & Y's marketing team tryed to identify potential service gaps with their pilot, and surveys and focus groups. As the case study mentions, the widest potential gap existed because of the Ernie's novelty. The gap between what customers may want and the actual services provided by Ernie could not be predicted because no customer defined standard of services existed for this online consulting tool. Thus, E & Y was forced to learn along the way, and make adjustments as needs arised. I visited Ernst & Young Online, what I assume is an updated version of "Ernie," and one of the frequently asked questions about the service conveyed customer preocupation with what this service could add to their business and what difference there was between the home page and this page. This proves that this service gap still exists; that is, customers frequently ask this question because they do not yet know how they can use this service nor what their "world" would be like if they used this service.
Secondly, I think that E & Y's strategy of holding on to their clients and not overly seeking new clients is a great message. As Kotler discusses and we have talked about in class, it's much more expensive to seek new clients than to hold on to and keep happy, loyal clients. The fact that E & Y marketed this new service mostly to their existing clients can also translate into other environments.
Thirdly, their pricing strategy to begin with was a very good idea. Keep prices low until they take the bait, then reel'em in. This is also applicable to most service environments.
This is a good example of a company growing with changing technologies, and keeping up with the expanding needs/capabilities of their clients, (even if a big risk is involved, after all, who knew it was going to be a success?)
| Back to Top | Helen's Homepage |