versus Adaptation, short-term habituation, and fatigue
Long term habituation
Stimulus specific
examples... Box 3.1, Box 3.2, LTD
Sensitization
Usually NOT Stimulus specific
Usually NOT as long-term
examples... Box 3.2, LTP
Habituation/Sensitization in Simple Animals (e.g., Aplysia:
Syphon touch, gill retraction, and Tail shock
Complexities
Intensity effects -- need not be linear.
Large individual differences
Post hoc Interpretations... as bad as Mr. Freud!!
Notice that the right balance of habituation and sensitization
sets optimal awareness.
Mrs. Coolidge shares a fact... the infamous "Coolidge
effect."
C. Association of Stimuli
Now, the 2 x 2 Association Matrix (Figure 3.1):
a. CS AND US BOTH PRESENT
b. CS ALONE (HABITUATION CTL)
c. US ALONE (SENSITIZATION CTL)
d. NEITHER CS NOR US (CONTEXT)
Association occurs when:
Contiguity of CS and US -- "CS and US Together" (Correlated)
Contingency between CS and US -- "CS predicts US"
p(US|CS) > all other cells.
Barker proposes a 2 stage theory -- Contiguity important
at first, Contingency important eventually
Example: Pavlov's Salivary Conditioning
Dog in harness sitting comfortably, but with a tube for meat
powder (US), a tube for saliva (UR, CR), and a bell (NS/CS).
Repeated trials with Bell preceding Food.
At first, the dog orients to the Bell, salivates to the Food.
Ultimately, the dog salivates to the Bell, salivates to the
Food.
CS -> CR
US -> UR
The Learning Curve: Figure 3.4
Other Examples:
Aplysia: Maintained Gill Withdrawal (CR) to Syphon Touch
(CS) if paired with tail shock (US) (Box 3.3)
Honeybee proboscis extension (CR) to cinnamon oil (CS) associated
with sugar water (US)
Infant eye blink (CR) to tone (CS) paired with small puff
of air to eye (US)
Excitatory Conditioning (vs Inhibitory Conditioning, to be
defined later)
Appetitive (Generally, US is something the individual will
approach and keep contact with)
Defensive, Aversive (Generally, US is something the individual
will escape or avoid)
Parameters (Procedural characteristics that you can change
yield the Four Tenets of Ass. Theory).
Type of CS-US pair (some combinations condition easily, some
with difficulty). Barker indicates this Tenet as "Similarity"
Intensity of CS/US (Rule: Within limits, the greater the
magnitude the better the conditioning)
CS-US interval (Rule: optimal conditioning when this interval
is between 0.5 sec to 7 sec)
Intertrial interval (Rule: optimal conditioning when this
interval is greater than 5 minutes)
Frequency (Rule: conditioning improves with continued training)
Is it Conditioning? or is it a Nonassociative Change in Reactivity?
Conditioning (Association) Group vs ... Nonassociative Groups
Habituation control group (CS only) and then test with CS
Sensitization control group (US only) and then test with
CS
Random control group (a = b = c) and then test with CS
Extinction and Spontaneous Recovery and Rapid Reconditioning
Presenting CS alone AFTER it has been trained as a CS leads
to decline in CR
Presenting CS and US Randomly after CS has been trained as
a CS leads to decline in CR
If Extinction is followed by a resting period and the extinction
resumes, there is a return of CR for several trials (Spontaneous Recovery)
If Extinction is followed by a return to Conditioning, CR
returns much more rapidly than during the initial conditioning.
External Inhibition and Internal Inhibition
Defining Inhibition: active suppression of CR.
External: a Disruptive stimulus occurs and CR does
not occur
Internal: Pavlov proposed that Extinction produced an active
suppression of CR. This is one account of spontaneous recovery.
Occasionally a new stimulus can disinhibit the CR.
Generalization and Discrimination
Stimuli similar to the CS also produce a CR.
The CR to these other stimuli may be of diminished strength
(Gradient of Generalization)
Generalization is Adaptive...
Second Signal System.
CS as first Signal (sight of apple "stands for" the
sweet/sour taste of apple.
A Name as second Signal (name of apple "stand for" this sweet/sour
taste too
Why distinguish between First and Second Signals? Because
the name often stands for the sight of the object that in turn stands for
"experience with" the object.
This association between words and the experience of things
is very powerful and is the basis of much of language.
How the Nervous System accomplishes Associative Learning
Remember the Aplysia.. We know which neurons change.
(Box 3.3)
A peek inside Spotski. We can see which areas of the brain
are involved. (Box 3.4)