Piero Manzoni at the Serpentine
Gallery, February 28 - April 26, 1998,
Kensington Gardens, London,
England
I had always thought of Piero Manzoni (1933-1963) as merely a prankster artist, setting the stage for Jeff Koons, Damien Hirst, and Orlan - artists who thrive on shock value. This was based on the work of his I learned about in art school - the infamous canned excrement, Merde d'artista. I was overwhelmed and giddy with the Manzoni exhibition at the newly renovated Serpentine Gallery, a lovely exhibition space on the edge of Kensington Gardens. Between the semi-opaque skylights and ceiling-to-floor windows casting simultaneous spells of intense light and subtle illumination, Manzoni's work absorbed and reflected back every ray. A Catholic and an anarchist, Manzoni died at the age of 29, but his rebellious aura permeates contemporary art, even overpowers it. The initial shock of Hirst's sharks in formaldehyde wears down into dull acknowledgement. Koon's pornographic photographs with Ciccolina are almost forgotten. Manzoni's shit, emptied breaths, and conceptual flurries, continue to expand the map of revolutionary artistic possibility.
The Serpentine Gallery, which
focuses on contemporary art, chose to reopen their doors with Manzoni
because of his pivotal role in the shattering of modernism into performative,
conceptual, and biting post-modernisms. Manzoni, along with Duchamp who
said that everything is art, Lucio Fontana's slit canvases, and Marcel
Broodthaers' painted bones,
helped to undermine traditional
notions of artistic production and reception, validate subversive strategies
as effective means to bring about change, and demonstrate the use of humor
as a provocative formal gesture. Walking into the room of achromes,
I was reminded of Robert Ryman's retrospective at the Museum of Modern
Art - all that splendid, meditative white. Manzoni's achromes are raw canvases,
undyed linens, felt, and off-white cloths - some stitched into minimalist
grids, others soaked in plaster, kaolin, and glue, and left to harden,
buckle, crack, and form on their
own. Critics, and even Manzoni himself, claim that the achromes are nothing
but emptied receptacles. But, like Rachel Whiteread's cast concrete house
that conjures up ghostly tenants and the gravity of housing issues,
have the pulls and folds of curtains,
some like pale acne flesh, and others read as near fatal lines on an electrocardiograph.
There are bread rolls in plaster, imprisoned clumps of inedible food,
its potential energy crystallized. Unlike Joseph Beuys' notorious felt
suit, Manzoni's felt is not anything but a stained grid, flat cushions
of soft gray, bleached
blue, and drained pink. Stepping into the next room, I am struck
by a formal shift from an overcast sky to a blooming flower garden. Vitrines
of fuchsia, violet, and Yves Klein blue house bursts of hairlike clouds.
Feathery fiberglass and wisps of cotton and wool appear electrified with
static charge. Although these pieces are also achromes, they do not absorb
all the light into themselves, but reflect brilliantly, especially within
the saturated vitrines. Display cases contain the detritus of Manzoni's
Fiato d'artista (Artist's breath) - collapsed red balloons, once full of
Manzoni's breath, their strings sealed with lead. Manzoni said, "When I
blow up the balloon, I am breathing my soul into an object that becomes
eternal." One is hit with a slap of mortality when one sees the deflated
remnants of such a serious breath. In the middle room Manzoni's
presence is immortalized. Two large cases stand side by side. One is filled
with scattered and stacked tins of his
canned excrement, Merda d'artista, which Manzoni sold for their weight
in gold. Down the side of the pedestal is a list of the private owners
who lent their tins to the Serpentine. I am amused by the success of Manzoni's
critique of the commodification of art, his scatological offering. The
other case contains Manzoni's Lineas (Lines), which are ink lines on paper
in labeled cardboard cylinders. Manzoni claimed, "The nature of the Linea
is eternal and infinite, the concept is everything. I put the Linea in
a container so that people can buy the idea of the Linea. I sell an idea,
an idea closed in a container. "
There are also two large plinths
in the gallery. Both prefigure by decades, Janine Antoni's chewed cube
of chocolate, Gnaw, and Mona Hautoum's magnet and iron filings cube, Socle
du Monde, (an homage to Manzoni). One wooden base, Base magica (Magic
base) turns whoever stands upon it into a work of living art. A copper
plate calls this piece Scultura vivente (living sculpture). There are two
shoe prints on the top of the plinth upon which the viewer is compelled
to stand. Dishearteningly, I did not see anyone attempt to stand on it.
The other iron and bronze plinth, Socle du monde (Base of the world), is
dedicated to Galileo, and appears to be upside down, supporting the earth
in reverse. According to Manzoni, this is the base of the world.
Perhaps the most beautiful pieces are the most fragile - his Uovo
con impronto (Egg with
thumbprint) from 1960. Manzoni
consecrated a number of hard-boiled eggs with his inked thumbprint. The
public was allowed to eat them, swallowing the entire exhibition in 70
minutes. One performance was called The consumption of art by
the art-devouring public. One recalls Felix Gonzalez-Torres' candy
spills, from which one could take a Baci or
caramel spiral, (a minuscule,
yet critical, piece from the pile that equaled the weight of Torres' and
his lover's bodies). One either let the chocolate melt on her tongue like
the Eucharist, or kept the candy as a fetish. Similarly, Manzoni's uneaten
eggs have discolored, some of the shells have cracked, breaking up Manzonis
sacred thumbprint, revealing the
calcified egg inside. The eggs
are cuddled in the familiar achromatic wool, protected by simple wood boxes.
A man's black thumbprint upon a white egg can not help but reference his
desire for a return to origin. In one of Manzoni's many manifestos he proclaims,
"Art is not true creation except insofar as it creates where mythologies
have their own ultimate origin. In order to assume the meaning of one's
own time, it is therefore necessary to attain one's own individual mythology
at the same point at which this becomes identified with the universal mythology.
Everything must be sacrificed to this possibility of discovery, this need
to assume one's own gestures."
