Ambition
Hard to say, really, which moment packed the most punch.
There was the kidnapping of a child by spooky sea hillbillies,
or the unexpected detonation of a new character by dynamite.
The landlocked slave ship. The anthropomorphic smoke demon.
The crazy French chick stealing the baby. The heroin addict's
apparent relapse. Or maybe it was the bio-mechanical island
monster uprooting trees and dragging people underground. Tough
call.
I'm talking, of course, about the season finale of ABC's
paranormal castaway drama Lost. TV's most ambitious new
show wrapped up its inaugural season with a stellar two-hour
episode that hit on all cylinders. It sustained the season's
delicate calibration of character study and action, as the
40-odd survivors of Oceanic Flight 815 have been dealing all
season with seeming miracles and certain terrors. The
headcount has varied, as the show is famously unafraid to kill
off heroes in service of story. (Good creative policy, but you
have to figure it makes the actors nervous.)
The finale had the castaways facing off against "The
Others," an as-yet unseen island faction that may be
responsible for all the weirdness. Lost trades heavily
on misdirection and plot twists, so the face-off wasn't what
-- or even where -- you expected. The much-hyped cliffhanger
ending came in the terrifying penultimate scene, with the
final moments offering more of a thematic resolution. In the
last shot, the camera lingered on our three ostensible leads
-- rational hero Jack (Matthew Fox), creepy mystic Locke
(Terry O'Quinn), and mercenary babe Kate (Evangeline Lily) --
as they peer down the tunnel beneath the mysterious hatch. Who
will lead? Tune in next fall.
Over the course of its first season, Lost proved
much more than the sum of its parts. Plane crash? Desert
island? Nascent society? Yes, we've heard this story before,
in forms as diverse as Lord of the Flies and
Gilligan's Island, but Lost switches up the
rhythms. Its deft admixture of (seemingly) supernatural
elements shifts the tonal palette into Twilight Zone
territory, while the ongoing mythology mystery puts it in the
bloodline of The X-Files and Twin Peaks, two
shows to which it is often compared. A story this multifaceted
needs a sturdy armature for narrative traction, and in that
sense the mythic stranded-in-the-wild story has proven
effective for a few thousand years now.
As with The X-Files and Twin Peaks, though,
it's the central mystery thread that hooks: What the hell
is going on?. Half the fun is trying to outguess the
writers, and literally hundreds of theories are documented on
various online fan sites. (The message boards at
www.lost-tv.com are best.) I have a theory myself, an insanely
complex and frankly brilliant hypothesis involving AI,
temporal shifts, and nanobots. I am confident I shall be
proved prescient in Season Two.
Beyond the plot twists, though, Lost features
recognizable characters and emotional stakes. For a show so
very pop (nearly pulp) in concept, it has shown an admirable
willingness to tackle both big issues (faith vs. science; free
will vs. fate) and delicate character arcs. Its liberal use of
flashback sequences illuminates the latter while expanding
plots past the boundaries of the island. The flashbacks
indicate the multivalent nature of the show and its title:
this is a story about human beings who were, in some way, lost
well before they boarded their flight.
For example, Matthew Fox's character, Dr. Jack Shepard, has
emerged as a moral axis. In the first few episodes, he seemed
a standard-issue square-jawed hero -- a natural leader,
conscientious and reliable, if a little humorless. Subsequent
flashbacks revealed deeper (and darker) layers, each new
revelation about his past then reflected in the present
storyline. And the finale presented a still more complicated
portrait -- a conflicted man of medicine trying to control
events that will not be controlled.
Against the flashier dramas of Locke or the addict Charlie
(Dominic Monaghan), Fox's contribution is easy to miss, but
Jack's story is the core of Lost. To ease the burden of
his perpetual seriousness, the series turns to peripheral
characters for leavening. The Zen slacker Hurley (Jorge
Garcia) shoulders most of the comic relief, but little gags
occur regularly within developing conflicts. Hurley's
flashback sequences -- expanded on in the finale -- provide
some of Lost's funniest and most touching moments.
These quieter flourishes hint at Lost's true heart:
The show presents as a sci-fi freakout (it's certainly
marketed as such), but the creators have a much more
fascinating and complex topic in mind -- people.
And there resides the unstated question, posed as a weirdly
intimate kind of subtext. In this situation, you could start
over completely -- reinvent yourself and your life. Some
theories suggest the island is a kind of purgatory, a
spiritual waystation, a place to begin again. None of the old
rules apply, and there may be magic involved. Would you lead?
Would you follow? Would you surrender to the island, like
Locke, or attempt to manage it, like Jack?
Or maybe you'd just do the practical thing -- run like hell
when the monster shows up. Lost can be enjoyed on any
or all of these levels. Part sci-fi thriller, part melodrama,
part existential mystery, Lost is a cross-genre mash-up
with the creative heart of an adrenalin junkie. The thrills
are not cheap -- they're earned -- and that's what finally
makes the show worthwhile for the loyal viewers who consumed
this first season in thirsty gulps.
— 14 June 2005