Ardal, Páll S.Passion and Value in Hume’s
Treatise.(Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1966).
Ardal, Páll S., “Another Look at Hume’s Account of Moral
Evaluation,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 15, Oct 77, pp.
405-421.
Baier, Annette, ‘Artificial Virtues
and the Equally Sensible Non-Knaves: A Response to Gauthier’, Hume Studies,
18 (1992), pp. 429-39.
Baier, Annette, “Hume’s Account of
Social Artifice: Its Origin and Originality,” Ethics 98 (July 1988), pp.
757-778.
Baier, Annette.“Master Passions.”In Explaining
Emotions.Edited by A.O. Rorty.(Berkeley: University of California Press,
1980).
Baier, Annette.A Progress of Sentiments: Reflections
on Hume’s Treatise.(Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1991).
Baron, Marcia, “Hume’s Noble Lie: An
Account of His Artificial Virtues,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12
(1982), pp. 539-555.
Blackburn, Simon, ‘Hume on the
Mezzanine Level’, Hume Studies, 19 (1993), 273-88.
Box, M.A.The Suasive Art of David
Hume.(Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990).
Bricke, John, ‘Hume, Motivation and
Morality’, Hume Studies, 14 (Apr. 1988), pp. 1-24.
Brown, Charlotte, “Is Hume an
Internalist?”, Journal of the History of Philosophy 26, no. 1 (Jan.
1988), pp. 69-87.
Cohon, Rachel, “Is Hume a Noncognitivist in the
Motivation Argument?”, Philosophical Studies 85 (1997), pp. 251-266.
Cohon, Rachel, “The Common Point of View in Hume’s
Ethics,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57, no. 4 (Dec. 1997),
pp. 827-850.
Coleman, Dorothy, ‘Hume’s
Internalism’, Hume Studies, 18 (1992), pp. 331-47.
Darwall, Stephen, “Hume and the
Invention of Utilitarianism,” M. A. Stewart and John P. Wright, eds., Hume
and Hume’s Connections (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1994), pp.
58-82.
Darwall, Stephen, “Motive and
Obligation in Hume’s Ethics,” Nous 27, no. 4 (1993), pp. 415-448.
Davidson, Donald. “Hume’s Cognitive Theory of
Pride.”Journal of Philosophy 73 (1967), pp. 744-57.
Dees, Richard, “Hume on the Characters
of Virtue,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 35, no. 1 (January
1997), pp. 45-64.
Falk, W. D., “Hume on Is and Ought” Canadian Journal
of Philosophy 6, (S 1976), pp. 359-378.
Falk, W.D., ‘Hume on Practical Reason’, Philosophical
Studies, 27 (1975), pp. 1-8.
Fogelin, Robert J.Hume’s Skepticism in the
Treatise of Human Nature.(London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985).
Foot, Philippa, “Hume on Moral Judgement,” in David
Pears, ed., David Hume (London, 1963), reprinted in Virtues and Vices,
1978, pp. 74-80.
Gauthier, David, ‘Three against
Justice: The Foole, the Sensible Knave, and the Lydian Shepherd’, Midwest
Studies in Philosophy VII (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press,
1982), pp. 11-29.
Gauthier, David, “Artificial Virtues
and the Sensible Knave,” Hume Studies 18, no. 2 (Nov. 1992), pp. 401-427.
Gauthier, David.“David Hume, Contractarian.”Philosophical
Review 88 (1979), pp. 3-38.
Glathe, A.B.Hume’s Theory of the Passions and of
Morals: A Study of Books II and III of the Treatise.(Berkeley: University
of California Press, 1950).
Glossop, Ronald J., ‘Is Hume a
“Classical Utilitarian”?, Hume Studies, 2 (1976), pp. 1-16.
Haakonssen, Knud.“Hume’s Obligations.”Hume
Studies 4 (1978), pp. 7-17.
Haakonssen, Knud.The Science of a Legislator: The
Natural Jurisprudence of David Hume and Adam Smith.(Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1981).
Harrison, Jonathan, Hume’s Moral Epistemology
(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976).
Harrison, Jonathan.Hume’s Theory of
Justice.(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981).
Hearn, Thomas K., ‘General Rules and the Moral Sentiments
in Hume’s Treatise’, Review of Metaphysics, 30 (1976), pp. 57-72.
Jenkins, John J., ‘Hume’s Account of Sympathy – Some
Difficulties’, in V. Hope (ed.), Philosophers of the Scottish Enlightenment
(Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1984), pp. 91-104.
Jones, Peter.“Cause, Reason, and Objectivity in Hume’s
Aesthetics,” in Hume: A Re-evaluation.
Jones, Peter.Hume’s Sentiments: Their Ciceronian and
French Context.(Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1982).
Kivy, Peter.“Hume’s Standard of Taste: Breaking the
Circle.”British Journal of Aesthetics 7 (1967), pp. 57-66.
Korsgaard, Christine, “Constructing
Character: Hume on Moral Approval, Love, and the General Point of View,” Hume
Studies. (April/November 1999).
Kydd, Rachel M.Reason and Conduct in Hume’s Treatise.(Oxford:
Clarendon Press, 1946); reprint, 1964.
Mackie, John L.Hume’s Moral Theory.(London:
Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980).
Magri, Tito, “Natural Obligation and
Normative Motivation in Hume’s Treatise,” Hume Studies 22, no. 2
(Nov. 1996), pp. 231-253.
McCracken, D.J., ‘David Hume and the Sentiment of Humanity’,
Actes du XI Congress International de Philosophie, 8 (1953), pp. 100-3.
MacIntyre, Alasdair C.“Hume on ‘Is’ and ‘Ought.’”Philosophical
Review 68 (1959), pp. 451-68.
McIntyre, Jane L.“Character: a Humean
Account.”History of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (1990), pp. 193-206.
McIntyre, Jane, “Character: a Humean
Account,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (1990), pp. 193-206.
Mercer, Philip, Sympathy and Ethics: A Study of the
Relationship between Sympathy and Morality, with Special Reference to Hume’s
Treatise (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972).
Millgram, Elijah, “Was Hume a Humean?”, Hume Studies
21, no. 1 (1995), pp. 75-93.
Nuyen, A.T., ‘David Hume on Reason, Passions and Morals’,
Hume Studies, 10 (1984), pp. 26-45.
Postema, Gerald, ‘Hume’s Reply to the
Sensible Knave’, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 5 (1988), pp. 23-40.
Radcliffe, Elizabeth, "How Does
the Humean Sense of Duty Motivate?," Journal of the History of
Philosophy 34 (July 1996), pp. 47-70.
Radcliffe, Elizabeth, “Kantian Tunes on a Humean
Instrument: Why Hume Is Not Really a Skeptic about Practical Reasoning,” Canadian
Journal of Philosophy 27 (June 1997), pp. 247-69.
Raphael, D.D. (ed.), British
Moralists 1650-1800, 2 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969; repr.
Indianapolis: Hackett, 1991).
Raphael, D.D., The Moral Sense
(London: Oxford University Press, 1947).
Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey,
""On Why Hume's 'General Point of View' Isn't Ideal -- and Shouldn't
Be," in Social Philosophy & Policy, volume 11, number 1 (Winter
1994), pp. 202-228.
Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey, "Hume and the Bauhaus Theory
of Ethics," Midwest Studies in
Philosophy, Vol. XX (University
of Notre Dame Press, 1996), pp. 280-298.
Schneewind, Jerome B. (ed.), Moral Philosophy from Montaigne
to Kant, 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).
Selby-Bigge, L.A. (ed.), British Moralists: Being
Selections from Writers principally of theEighteenth Century, 2 vols.
(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1897; repr. New York: Dover, 1965).
Shaver, Robert, ‘Hume and the Duties
of Humanity’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 30 (1992), pp.
545-56.
Snare, Francis.Morals Motivation and Convention:
Hume’s Influential Doctrines.(New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991).
Stroud, Barry, “‘Gilding or Staining’ the World with
‘Sentiments’ and Phantasms,’” Hume Studies 19, no. 2, (Nov. 1993), pp.
253-272.
Stroud, Barry.Hume.(London:
Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977).
Taylor, Jacqueline, “Justice and the
Foundations of Social Morality in Hume’s Treatise,” Hume Studies
24, no. 1 (April 1998), pp. 5-30.
Vanterpool, Rudolph V., ‘Hume on the “Duty” of
Benevolence’, Hume Studies, 14 (Apr. 1988), pp. 93-110.