Sociology 31, Fall 1998, Prof. Aldrich and Ms. Renzulli
December 1st 1998 Summary
Summary of Worker Participation: Self-managed teams and Open book management
|
Review Questions: |
||
|
What Makes Bureaucratic control so efficient? (See Web page notes for last class) |
|
|
|
How/why can offices be organized like factories? (See Web page notes for last class) |
|
|
|
Will new technology improve or degrade work experiences in secretarial work? |
Improve:
|
Degrade:
|
|
Worker Participation: a scale from "most" at top to "least" at bottom. Based on our readings & class discussion this term. See also the reading today from Hodson & Sullivan |
Level of wkr part. |
|
Worker ownership/cooperative (similar to Japanese management) |
Most |
|
Open book management (today's reading) |
|
|
Workers’ councils |
|
|
Self-managed teams (today's reading) |
More |
|
Unions |
|
|
Quality Circles |
|
|
Suggestion boxes |
|
|
Scientific management |
Least |
|
Open book Management: |
Self-managed Teams |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Study question: what affect does it have on the 4 dimensions of worker experience? |
Study Question: How are self-managed teams different from open book management? Study question: Under what conditions are self-managed teams most appropriate? (E.g. when the job entails a high level of complexity or dependency among people) Compare to the conditions under which we do NOT find technical control! Study question: what affect does it have on the 4 dimensions of worker experience? |
|
Film: Available at non-print, V-6927, Harmon Company (maker of JBL/Infinity stereo equipment) |
|
|
Management works on the line |
Is Harmon a bureaucracy? |
|
Workers set targets and share profit: Sharing Cost Saving |
How is cost sharing similar to open book management? How is it different? |