oct 5th workshop
I read Sam's paper
2-the paper does a good job representing one partys view and why it is affective, but it does not even mention the other party's views, the paper does not oppose one view, it just presents one side in a positive way.
3-the paper thesis statement presents the point of the paper well, and views a brief overview of what the paper is about and the stand it takes on the issue.
4-the paper does a good job using all the strategies except pathos, at several places he could have used personal experiences to help drive home the point and appeal to more people since he knows from first hand experience the things he is talking about.
5-i think that the paper is convincing, it gives strong arguements to why Kerry's plan is more powerful and presents the views of Kerry in a very positive light. He uses good points and various sources that help drive the point he is trying to make home.
2-the paper does a good job representing one partys view and why it is affective, but it does not even mention the other party's views, the paper does not oppose one view, it just presents one side in a positive way.
3-the paper thesis statement presents the point of the paper well, and views a brief overview of what the paper is about and the stand it takes on the issue.
4-the paper does a good job using all the strategies except pathos, at several places he could have used personal experiences to help drive home the point and appeal to more people since he knows from first hand experience the things he is talking about.
5-i think that the paper is convincing, it gives strong arguements to why Kerry's plan is more powerful and presents the views of Kerry in a very positive light. He uses good points and various sources that help drive the point he is trying to make home.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home