*** Please remember that this is only a guide to some of the more important concepts. If you missed class, this review material alone will not be sufficient – please get the notes from a classmate! (please also keep in mind that I cannot explain whole lectures over email) ****
Written Language
Ways in which words can be symbolized in writing:
1. Logographic system: a
unique symbol is used for each word or each morpheme of a language.
2. Syllabic system: each
symbol reflects a syllable.
3. Alphabetic system: the
symbols try to approximate the phonemes in a language.
Variations in letter to phoneme correspondence:
1. SHALLOW ORTHOGRAPHY:The Pandemonium Model of Letter Recognition
close correspondence, i.e., the letters really represent the sounds
2. DEEP ORTHOGRAPHY:
no close correspondence
Connectionist Model of Word Recognition
* Interactive (bottom-up and top-down)
The Word Superiority effect -
Possible routes from written word to lexical access
* Direct Route
* Assembled Route
* Dual Route
- Evidence for dual routes from "normal" readers
- experiment with homophones
- Frequency effects and the dual routes to lexical access in reading:
* High frequency words – named fast regardless of whether or not they follow
standard phonological rules
* Low frequency words – naming latencies depend on whether they follow
phonological rules (faster if they do)
* "Horse-race" model
Factors that influence word recognition
* Frequency
* Neighborhood
effects or lexical similarity effects
* Effects
of context
Skilled readers (normal, non-dyslexic):
When reading fails: Dyslexia-reading disabilities despite normal general intellectual abilities, vision, and opportunities and motivation to read.* high-frequency words: fast, direct route from print to word meaning* low-frequency words: slower, assembled route from print to phonolgy to meaning
Types of Dyslexia
1. Phonological form of Dyslexia
Localization of Language in the Brain; Part 1 – Human Patients
Aphasia - loss of one or more aspects of language ability due to brain damage
A. History
1. Paul Broca
- Left Frontal
2. Carl Wernicke
- Left superior temporal
1. Broca’s Aphasia:
Halting, telegraphic and agrammatic speech
2.Wernicke’s Aphasia:
-Fluent language production
-Severe comprehension disorder
-"press of speech" = excessive abundance of words
- "empty speech" =fail to convey the ideas they have in mind
Localization of Language in the Brain;3. Conduction Aphasia:
- Damage to pathway connecting Broca’s & Wernicke’s areas
- Loss of ability to monitor own speech and difficulty repeating sentences
Language Acquisition in Special CircumstancesElectroencephalography (EEG) / Event-Related Potentials (ERP)1. Semantic processing experiments• semantically-anomalous words produce large negative wave (the N400)• physically aberrant words do not produce an N400
• Wernicke's aphasics do produce an N400, but it's reduced in amplitude (size) and delayed in time.
A. Second-language acquisition
* the earlier,
the better
* old myth
about children being confused when learning more than 1 language isn't
true
* Explanations
for why children acquire a second language more easily at younger ages:
1. Innate grammar can only be accessed fully during a specific early period
of life
2. Competition Model - rules from the first
language become more and more automatic
3. The "less-is-more hypothesis":limitations
in short-term memory, result in language being parsed into smaller parts;
The partial storage makes it easier to catch on to the morphology of an
unfamiliar language.
Pidgins & Creoles: "Language Invention"
Pidgin - the
rudimentary communications that develop when a group of speakers from different
linguistic backgrounds are placed together in close association
Creoles -the
language
that results when children make a pidgin their native language (Children
inject grammatical complexity where none had existed before)
* Examples - Hawaiin Creole
* Sign Language examples
- Nicaragua schools for the deaf
- Deaf children born to hearing parents
Dissociation of Language and Cognition in Acquisition
Language deficits with preserved
cognitive abilities:
* Specific
Language Impairment (SLI)
Cognitive deficits with preserved
language abilities
* Down syndrome
- Very low general IQ
- Language is delayed, but speech is fairly normal in other respects
* Williams
Syndrome
- Profound cognitive deficit
- Have very well developed language abilities
Problem Solving (chapter 11)
History:
Behaviorists:
Thorndike’s puzzle box (1898)
- "generalization"
Gestalt
Wolfgang Kohler (1925)
- Chimpanzee exp.’s
- insight ("aha!"), not trial and error
Productive -vs- Reproductive thinking
Information-processing
approach
- series of ordered processes that can be combined in various ways
Problem Space / Problem representation:
- initial state
- current state
- goal state
*operators – actions that modify
the problem states
Types of Problems
1. Well-defined vs. Ill-defined problems
Well-defined:
* Problems of inducing structure
* Problems of transformation
* Problems of arrangement2. Routine vs. Non-routine
3. Adversary vs. Nonadversary
Strategies for Solving Problems
Algorithms -vs- Heuristics
1. Search Strategies
2. Means-End Analysis
3. Hill-climbing
4. Analogical Transfer
Obstacles in Problem solving
1. Problem-solving set
2. Functional Fixedness
Improving Problem SolvingExperts vs. Novices
1. Remain flexible
2. Take risk
3. "Concretize" the problem
4. Expand problem space (but note hints don’t always help)
5. Use Alternative Representations
1. Experts represent a problem differently (schemata)
* group problems differently
* chess masters’ memory
2. Experts use a different solution strategyThe Brain & Problem Solving
* Forward-working
* Backward-working (novices)
(Example - Physicians’ diagnoses)
Critical Thinking
Decision-making & Reasoning (Ch 12)1. Solution may not be clear2. "Satisficing" – willing to settle for a good solution rather than the best
3. Use heuristics
Heuristics in Decision-making:
* Availability Heuristic
* Representativeness Heuristic
* Risky Behavior
Reaching Decisions1. Compensatory models
a. Additive model
b. Additve-Difference model2. Noncompensatory models
a. Elimination by aspects
b. Conjunctive model
Group Decision-makingJuriesContent errors and biases in groups
1. Informational errors
2. Groupthink
3. Incremental decision making (& Social-loafing)
4. Content error / content bias
- illusion of validity (heuristic)-
Reasoning1. More focused on relevant matters
2. more members contributed
3. less domination of discussion by few members
4. Improved consensus-reaching
5. Improved satisfaction with final decisions
Informal vs. Formal reasoning
Deductive vs. Inductive reasoning
Inductive Reasoning
Syllogistic reasoning
1. Categorical syllogisms – describe category inclusion and exclusion.
Figure 12.3 (just understand how some of these possibilities may be overlooked or not considered – leading to errors (see next part below))
1. Ambiguity Theory2. Conversion Theory
2. Conditional syllogisms – involves conditional logic.1. Atmosphere theory2. Mental model theory
- Conditional rules
- Bi-conditional rules
- Errors
1. Affirmation of the consequent2. Denial of the antecedent
- Reasons for errors:
Inductive Reasoning-3. Linear syllogisms – involves propositions that describe the linear ordering of objects. May involve visual and verbal processing1. Faulty translation2. Pragmatic reasoning – takes "experience: into account
Piaget’s Stages of Cognitive Development
7-11 years : Concrete Operational:
* deductive reasoning limited to those objects that are physically present
* intrapropositional reasoning only
11-15 years: Formal Operational:
* can reason hypothetically about objects that aren’t present and about
abstract concepts
* interpropositional reasoning
Alternative theory – quantitative factors (such as working
memory capacity) account for differences across ages
Animal Cognition
Ch 14: pp. 452-459; pp467-469)
Conceptual learning (pp 452-453).
1. "Clever Hans"
2. Reasoning in Rats – Figure 14.8
3. Sarah (female
chimp)
* able to identify solutions to real-world problems that she had never
performed herself
* Solved analogies (>80%)
Self-Awareness (pp467-469)
1. Gallup’s Mirror experiments