home -1918 1918-1941 1941-1945 1945-1980 1980-1991 1991-present current maps personalities sources&links document
History 1991-present
Overview: Milosevic's Decade

    With disintegration of Yugoslavia in 1991, one quarter of Serbs found themselves outside the Serbian state in Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina. The issues concerning political transformation to democracy and economic reforms in Serbia were overshadowed in the first half of the 1990s by the national question and the fate of Serbs outside the country.

   In this atmosphere, the explosive potential of nationalism to mobilize and unite people around common symbols and historical vision was fully exploited by the politicians, who forwarded popular sentiments in the direction of militant nationalism. Such strategy allowed politicians to solidify hold on power and externalize problems challenging the country. The course of events in Serbia had been marked by ethnic conflict, nationalist rhetoric, personalized politics, a failing economy and international isolation. Amidst the uncertainty of the decade one of the few constant factors in Serbia was the continued political leadership of the country by Slobodan Milosevic. Having managed to stay in power following the multiparty elections in 1990, Milosevic and his Socialist Party of Serbia (SPS) monopolized the political scene. Characterized by many observers as an opportunist, Milosevic activated nationalist sentiments when they could prove politically profitable, such as in the early 1990s with wars in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Croatia and in 1997-98 with unrest in Kosovo.

   In 1992 Serbia and Montenegro formed the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY). According to the constitution, the republics were presidential systems and the federation - a parliamentary system. However, the real political power lay outside the political institutions in the hands of informal groups presided over by Slobodan Milosevic.

   Despite the semblance of free multi-party elections, the opposition had been unable to unseat Milosevic for the greater part of the decade. The opposition was plagued by fragmentation and infighting over a single program whereas Milosevic's SPS maintained control of the state apparatus and set the agenda for political debate. Having inherited not only formal political power but also real control over coercive agencies, economic structures and mass media, Milosevic, with few exceptions, kept a tight control over the opposition. He manipulated public opinion through state-controlled information sources. While allowing opposition groups and independent media outlets to exist in order to preserve the façade of democracy, Milosevic would clamp down when they presented a threat to his preferred political arrangement. The economy plummeted in the early 1990s due to international sanctions and unabated corruption and criminal practices by Milosevic's allies. State, economy, security and criminal element remained virtually linked, providing Milosevic with mechanisms of control.

The first phase of Milosevic's rule: manipulation of the political discourse

source
    In the first elections to the Serbian parliament, Milosevic's party SPS aligned with the radical nationalist party SRS to secure the majority. The elections that followed the dissolution of the parliament in 1993 allowed Milosevic to distance himself from the Serbian Radical Party and to secure victory for his party on the basis of a Serbian nationalist platform. In the atmosphere of complete international isolation imposed on FRY for its support of the Bosnian Serbs, Milosevic's party promised stability and national development, while economic hardships were blamed on UN sanctions.

    During the 1996 elections the political climate changed in Serbia. The Dayton Accords were signed with close involvement by Milosevic, who played the role of a peace-maker in negotiations. Hyperinflation, which in 1993 exceeded the record set by the Weimar Republic, was finally halted in 1994 when a new director of the central bank was appointed. Economic sanctions against FRY were lifted and the country was gaining international recognition.

    With the war over, economic issues took center stage for voters. SPS used the Dayton agreement as evidence of the successful resolution of the Serbian national question and as a demonstration of the party's commitment to peace and economic prosperity.
The rise and the fall of the opposition
    Milosevic's SPS was challenged in the 1996 elections by the opposition parties, which formed a coalition called Zajedno (Together). The opposition coalition came in second in the federal elections and won majority of seats in the main cities.

Supporters of the "ZAJEDNO" (Together) coalition celebrate the victory in local elections
Copyright © 1996 Zoran Tatar, DUGA Magazine
source

    Milosevic's refusal to accept the electoral victory of Zajedno in local elections led to mass street protests and the involvement of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), which persuaded him to back down.

    However, once the coalition occupied its positions in the city governments, it demonstrated its insolvency and inability to stay united, discrediting the opposition movement.

Milosevic's popularity begins to wane

    By 1997 Zajedno lost its political capital while the nationalist party, SRS, managed to present itself as a strong opposition party. Although by the end of 1997 the Serbian parliament and presidency were staffed with Milosevic's allies, the year marked the erosion of his popularity.

    Vojislav Seselj and his nationalist populist party reemerged on the political scene and Milo Djukanovic, the reform-minded politician increasingly critical of Milosevic's regime, was elected President of Montenegro. The lack of political and economical transformation and the continuation of sanctions against Serbia created an atmosphere of apathy among the population.

    The popularity of Seselj's party was based on his balloting as an opposition candidate and the program of law and order. However, his rhetoric after the elections revealed that he had not abandoned the extreme nationalist ideas, which he proclaimed for years.

Nationalist shift and the war in Kosovo

    The escalation of the conflict with Kosovo Albanians, who wanted to gain independence from Serbia, galvanized the Kosovo Serb population, but in Serbia proper, people were wary of nationalist rhetoric. As Milosevic's political priorities shifted toward Kosovo he found political allies in the rival Serbian Radical Party (SRS), led by Vojislav Seselj. This political alliance indicated that he opted for an isolationist and nationalist course in the resolution of the crisis.

    Indeed, the Serb forces intensified punitive operations in Kosovo in response to the acceleration of Albanian armed resistance. Slobodan Milosevic rebuffed Western threats of military action against Serbia if he failed to accept an agreement on Kosovo, and on March 24, 1999, bombing raids on Serbia began. With NATO bombings, the opposition's attempts to unseat Milosevic had crumbled as he consolidated popular support on the basis of widely-shared anti-Western sentiments.

    Serbian punitive operations did not stop during the bombings and refugees continued to flee Kosovo. The NATO operation aimed to incapacitate the Serb military and damage the infrastructure, but succeeded in the later and failed in the former. On June 3, 1999, after 11 weeks of bombings, Milosevic accepted the peace proposal drafted by G8, according to which the UN would supervise Kosovo and the decision on its final status was indefinitely postponed. Economic and diplomatic sanctions against Serbia further contributed to the decline in the standard of living and reinforced the redistributive economy and political structures that promoted it.


Belgrade burning after NATO bombings
source
Milosevic's downfall


source

    In the fall of 2000 the newly formed democratic opposition, DOS, led by Zoran Djindjic, finally managed to defeat Milosevic in elections and remove him from office. The democratic victory was made possible by behind-the-scene deals with people from the State Security apparatus and with criminal gangs, which previously made up Milosevic's support base and were interested in protecting their illegal incomes and covering up their wartime crimes.

    In effect, Milosevic left a system in which state, economy, organized crime and state coercive apparatus were tightly intertwined. Djindjic's challenge as president of Serbia was to introduce reforms and secure Western support through cooperation with the Hague War Crimes Tribunal, which implied that he had to turn on the so-called "dark forces" that helped him to come to power. On March 12, 2003, Zoran Djindjic was assassinated, many believe, for being too proactive in dealing with organized crime and cooperating with the International Tribunal in handing over the indicted war criminals.
Continued challenges and uncertainty

    The parliamentary elections in December, 2003, in which the Serbian Radical Party (SRS), led by indicted war criminal, Vojislav Seselj, awaiting trial in Hague, won the greatest number of votes, cast a shadow over the prospects of Serbia's development toward democracy and reforms. However, it is early to conclude that Serbia once again is striding down the path of extreme nationalism.

    After all, the SRS's election campaign was two-fold, exploiting nationalist sentiments arising from feelings of national humiliation and perceived treatment as pariahs by the international community and feelings of discontent with the outgoing reformist government, which failed to achieve significant breakthroughs in economy and reforms. The election results signal popular dissatisfaction with economic hardships accompanying the transition to market economy combined with Serbia's unfavorable international position. After months of negotiations, Vojislav Kostunica formed a minority coalition in the parliament with his moderate nationalist Democratic Party of Serbia and the pro-reform parties, while at the same time keeping options open for alliance with Milosevic's SPS and nationalist SRS. The multiple challenges facing the new prime minister include economic restructuring, relations with Montenegro, the issue of Kosovo, fighting corruption, European integration and cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunal in Hague.

    The issue of nationalism continues to loom on the political horizon in Serbia as the Serbian Radical Party's presidential candidate for elections scheduled for June, 2004, enjoys the highest levels of support among the population. The disjointed character of the pro-reform forces still plagues the political scene as their disunity and lack of a single political vision sets a stage for the return of the nationalist and communist parties, which have led Serbia into two wars in the last decade.

The borders and state-structure of Serbia are still uncertain. The union of Serbia and Montenegro, an arrangement imposed on both territorial entities by the international community, has to undergo structural changes before it can function. The issue of Kosovo and its final status remains undecided. The autonomy of the northern province of Vojvodina has been called into question by the Serbian Radical Party.
The agenda of the economic reforms in Serbia continues to be set by the international financial institutions. Since 2000, the government managed to achieve stable exchange rates, restructure the financial and banking sector and pass privatization legislation. However, privatization is going slowly and corruption remains widespread. Poverty and unemployment rates are high. Continued lack of substantial economic improvements may discredit the reforms altogether.

    To a great extent, the future of Serbian development depends on the international community. Western support is critical for the union of Serbia and Montenegro to function, for the advancement of the economic reforms, and for moderating the political mood of the government. A particularly thorny question in relations with the West is handing over the indicted war criminals to the International Tribunal in Hague. Cooperation with ICTY puts Serbian politicians in an uncomfortable situation, in which, on the one side, compliance can cost the loss of popular support and obstructionism, on the other, can mean the forfeiture of international aid. Serbian development toward democracy and market reforms is dependent on favorable international conditions that would make the option of integration into the European community attainable and attractive. International isolation, on the other hand, can bring back the extreme nationalism, which may prove dangerous in the country with unsettled borders and wide-spread poverty.


Milosevic's legacy lives on in Serbia. His Serbian Socialist Party continues to draw support among the population. source

Bibliography

John R. Lampe Yugoslavia as History: Twice There was a Country (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, 2nd edition) pp.487

Robert Thomas Serbia under Milosevic: Politics in the 1990s (London: Hurst & Company, 1999) pp. 443

Laslo Sekelj 'Parties and Elections: The Federal republic of Yugoslavia - Change Without Transformation' Europe-Asia Studies (Vol. 52, No. 1, 2000) pp.57-75

Lenard J. Cohen 'The Politics of Despair: Radical Nationalism and Regime Crisis in Serbia' Kokkalis Program on Southeastern and East-Central Europe, Harvard University, Working Paper #1, 1999, pp.27

'Serbia After Djindjic: Executive Summary and Recommendations' Balkans Report No. 141 (Belgrade/Brussels: International Crisis Group, March 2003) pp.18

Country Report: Serbia and Montenegro (London: The Economist Intelligence Unit, March 2004) www.eiu.com

Barry R. Posen 'The War for Kosovo' International Security 2000, 24 (4):39-84

Timothy Garton Ash 'Kosovo: Was It Worth It?' New York Review of Books 2000, 47 (Aug.10, No. 13):20

International Criminal Tribunal on the Former Yugoslavia www.un.org/icty/