| History 1991-present | ||
| Overview:
Milosevic's Decade |
With
disintegration of Yugoslavia in 1991, one quarter of Serbs found themselves
outside the Serbian state in Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina. The issues
concerning political transformation to democracy and economic reforms
in Serbia were overshadowed in the first half of the 1990s by the national
question and the fate of Serbs outside the country. |
|
| The
first phase of Milosevic's rule: manipulation of the political discourse
|
In
the first elections to the Serbian parliament, Milosevic's party SPS aligned
with the radical nationalist party SRS to secure the majority. The elections
that followed the dissolution of the parliament in 1993 allowed Milosevic
to distance himself from the Serbian Radical Party and to secure victory
for his party on the basis of a Serbian nationalist platform. In the atmosphere
of complete international isolation imposed on FRY for its support of the
Bosnian Serbs, Milosevic's party promised stability and national development,
while economic hardships were blamed on UN sanctions. During the 1996 elections the political climate changed in Serbia. The Dayton Accords were signed with close involvement by Milosevic, who played the role of a peace-maker in negotiations. Hyperinflation, which in 1993 exceeded the record set by the Weimar Republic, was finally halted in 1994 when a new director of the central bank was appointed. Economic sanctions against FRY were lifted and the country was gaining international recognition. With the war over, economic issues took center stage for voters. SPS used the Dayton agreement as evidence of the successful resolution of the Serbian national question and as a demonstration of the party's commitment to peace and economic prosperity. |
|
|
The
rise and the fall of the opposition |
Milosevic's SPS was challenged in the 1996 elections by the opposition parties, which formed a coalition called Zajedno (Together). The opposition coalition came in second in the federal elections and won majority of seats in the main cities. | |
Supporters of the "ZAJEDNO" (Together) coalition celebrate the victory in local elections Copyright © 1996 Zoran Tatar, DUGA Magazine source |
Milosevic's refusal to accept the electoral victory of Zajedno in local elections led to mass street protests and the involvement of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), which persuaded him to back down. However, once the coalition occupied its positions in the city governments, it demonstrated its insolvency and inability to stay united, discrediting the opposition movement. |
|
| Milosevic's
popularity begins to wane |
By 1997 Zajedno lost its political capital while
the nationalist party, SRS, managed to present itself as a strong opposition
party. Although by the end of 1997 the Serbian parliament and presidency
were staffed with Milosevic's allies, the year marked the erosion of his
popularity. |
|
| Nationalist
shift and the war in Kosovo |
The
escalation of the conflict with Kosovo Albanians, who wanted to gain independence
from Serbia, galvanized the Kosovo Serb population, but in Serbia proper,
people were wary of nationalist rhetoric. As Milosevic's political priorities
shifted toward Kosovo he found political allies in the rival Serbian Radical
Party (SRS), led by Vojislav Seselj. This political alliance indicated
that he opted for an isolationist and nationalist course in the resolution
of the crisis. |
|
|
Milosevic's
downfall |
In the
fall of 2000 the newly formed democratic opposition, DOS, led by Zoran Djindjic,
finally managed to defeat Milosevic in elections and remove him from office.
The democratic victory was made possible by behind-the-scene deals with
people from the State Security apparatus and with criminal gangs, which
previously made up Milosevic's support base and were interested in protecting
their illegal incomes and covering up their wartime crimes. In effect, Milosevic left a system in which state, economy, organized crime and state coercive apparatus were tightly intertwined. Djindjic's challenge as president of Serbia was to introduce reforms and secure Western support through cooperation with the Hague War Crimes Tribunal, which implied that he had to turn on the so-called "dark forces" that helped him to come to power. On March 12, 2003, Zoran Djindjic was assassinated, many believe, for being too proactive in dealing with organized crime and cooperating with the International Tribunal in handing over the indicted war criminals. |
|
|
Continued challenges and uncertainty |
The
parliamentary elections in December, 2003, in which the Serbian Radical
Party (SRS), led by indicted war criminal, Vojislav Seselj, awaiting trial
in Hague, won the greatest number of votes, cast a shadow over the prospects
of Serbia's development toward democracy and reforms. However, it is early
to conclude that Serbia once again is striding down the path of extreme
nationalism. |
|
|
Milosevic's legacy lives on in Serbia. His Serbian Socialist Party continues to draw support among the population. source |
||
|
Bibliography
|
John R. Lampe Yugoslavia as History: Twice There was a Country (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, 2nd edition) pp.487 Robert Thomas Serbia under Milosevic: Politics in the 1990s (London: Hurst & Company, 1999) pp. 443 Laslo Sekelj 'Parties and Elections: The Federal republic of Yugoslavia - Change Without Transformation' Europe-Asia Studies (Vol. 52, No. 1, 2000) pp.57-75 Lenard J. Cohen 'The Politics of Despair: Radical Nationalism and Regime Crisis in Serbia' Kokkalis Program on Southeastern and East-Central Europe, Harvard University, Working Paper #1, 1999, pp.27 'Serbia After Djindjic: Executive Summary and Recommendations' Balkans Report No. 141 (Belgrade/Brussels: International Crisis Group, March 2003) pp.18 Country Report: Serbia and Montenegro (London: The Economist Intelligence Unit, March 2004) www.eiu.com Barry R. Posen 'The War for Kosovo' International Security 2000, 24 (4):39-84 Timothy Garton Ash 'Kosovo: Was It Worth It?' New York Review of Books 2000, 47 (Aug.10, No. 13):20 International Criminal Tribunal on the Former Yugoslavia www.un.org/icty/ |