One little sentence from Polly nicely situates the slurry of thoughts that has been percolating in my mind for the last few days: "I believe that time is one of the most essential elements for reflective teaching." Time is definitely essential and, as the literature continues to illuminate, the lack of time is a key factor in the lack of reflection among practicing teachers. There's nothing new in that observation; time is sorely lacking in most people's lives, regardless of profession. Teaching, however, is a profession that requires "time" as a condition of sucess: teachers need more time to interact with students, to teach content, to grade papers, to plan lessons, to create community, to develop professionally and - yes - to reflect.
So, if we know this, why are teachers faced with less and less time to concentrate on the important components of their job? Putting aside the intercom interruptions and the pep rallies and the mandated testing and the paperwork - why are teachers provided with so little time to reflect, either individually or communally? Why isn't time built into the day, in some form or fashion, to give teachers time to think?
Perhaps - and this is just a suggestion - we don't actually want our teachers to reflect. "Why," you say, "that makes no sense! Reflection is one of the key components of teacher education; programs across the US teach reflection, read about reflection, encourage reflection, study reflection. You're just talking crazy, woman!"
Okay, but consider this: reflection is an agent of change. By truly reflecting about a situation, we are attempting to both understand and change. Dewey likened reflection to the scientific process: analysis and action must follow description for reflection to take place. So, action is implicitly tied to the reflective act. In reflecting, a teacher is really asking the question, "Why" - why did this happen? why did I react this way? why is this acceptable? why does this need to change? So, reflection leads to action leads to change.
But schools don't like change. We're talking about a conserving institution, one that has stayed remarkably similar since its inception in the US. Teachers have one role, students another, and ne'er the twain shall meet. If teachers start thinking about things - using reflection as a step toward questioning the status quo - they might realize that much needs changing. They might even attempt to make those changes themselves, god forbid.
By appropriating the simple component of time, the institution manages to maintain itself. Even though most teachers may realize much needs to change, they do so without engaging with those fleeting thoughts; it's all they can do to manage an overcrowded classroom in an underfunded school. Teachers who don't have time to think don't have time to act, and without action from teachers, schools cannot change for the better.