Research

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

         Research Description     
 
         Job market paper:
        
        "Unemployment duration and part-time versus full-time reemloyment and wages"
        Adviser: Dr. Guilkey
        Abstract: The main goals of my research are to estimate the effects of unemployment
                     duration on formerly unemployed workers' wages, to analyze the determinants
                     of part-time versus full-time reemployment, and to measure the impact of
                     part-time versus full-time work on wages. Using the 1996 and 2001 panels of
                     the Survey of Income and Program Participation, I find that for the typical man
                     a one month increase in the duration of unemployment leads to a 0.4% decrease
                     in reemployment wages. In contrast, for the typical woman, I fail to find any
                     effect of unemployment duration on wages. Furthermore, as unemployment
                     progresses, holding everything else equal, part-time reemployment is more likely
                     than full-time reemployment for both genders. In addition, for men, my results show
                     that there is no part-time and full-time wage differential for workers with less than
                     a high school education, and for the same group of women, there exists a positive
                     part-time wage premium. With the exception of women with an advanced degree,
                     for both women and men, I find evidence of the existence of a full-time wage
                     premium for higher levels of education, and the premium increases with the level
                     of education. In this paper, I also simulate a short-term macroeconomic policy for
                     a reduction of the state unemployment rate by 2 percentage points, which would
                     alleviate the negative effects of prolonged unemployment on men's reemployment
                     and wages. The simulation results show that a reduction in the state unemployment
                     rate decreases the average duration of unemployment, and slightly increases the log
                     of hourly wage rate for men.
      
       Working paper:
      
       "Testing the validity of self-reported disability as a measure of true disability"

       Abstract: The main question of this research is whether self-reported disability is systematically
                     biased relative to the SSA disability measures. In other words, are the self-reported
                     disability measures in surveys conducted by independent organizations reliable? There
                     is no doubt that many individuals may overestimate their disability conditions for the
                     SSA due to rationalization factors. However, Benitez-Silva et al., by introducing the RUR
                     hypothesis, believe that the applicants of the disability programs are fully aware of the
                     SSA's disability criteria and their self-reported disabilities in a non-governmental survey
                     are adjusted by the SSA's disability norm. In this paper, I have tested the RUR hypothesis
                     by revisiting Benitez-Silva et al. (2004). First, I replicated Benitez-Silva et al.'s analysis
                     as accurately as possible and then, using information from the additional three waves of
                     the Health Retirement Study, I make updates to the analysis. The main implications from
                     the non-parametric and parametric tests are that for the majority of individuals' observed
                     characteristics, assuming that the SSA and applicants use the same characteristics in
                     disability determination, the SSA and individuals probably use different weights, which
                     is a direct contradiction to the RUR hypothesis.

        "The causal relationship between unemployment duration and unemployed worker's health"
     
        Abstract: The main goal of this paper is to explore the impact of impaired health on the duration of
                     unemployment. It is a common belief that self-reported health correlates with unobserved
                     factors in the duration of unemployment equation. To solve this endogeneity problem,
                     I propose the empirical model where I jointly estimate the health and duration equations
                     controlling for unobserved worker heterogeneity using a discrete factor method proposed by
                     Mroz and Guilkey(1995) and Mroz (1999). Using the 1996 and 2001 panels of the Survey of
                     Income and Program Participation, I find that for men and women, a worker with impaired
                     health has a significantly longer unemployment spell than a healthy counterpart. Furthermore,
                     the results show that a worker with impaired health more likely ends up with a part-time job.