We
don’t all eat the same, talk the same, walk the same or even look the same.
Just like everything else, the way in which we process information differs
from individual to individual. We are not all offered the same opportunities
throughout life. We do not all have the same chances to assure the
best possible outcome for our lives. Because of this reality, a standardized
curriculum that includes performance testing should be discouraged in Language
Arts classes because requiring every student to perform at the same level
restricts a students’ individuality, creativity and their learning process;
not to mention unfairly restricts the abilities of those who are less fortunate
than others.
Requiring every student
to adhere to the same set of standards greatly restricts their independence.
The principles of this country were founded on the ideals of freedom and
individuality. We applaud and even respect those who go beyond the
norm to prove their individuality, so why disregard these ideals when it
comes to the education of our children. Teachers who ignore the slower
learners and don’t challenge the faster learners enough are the ones we
entrust to design standardized curriculums and hold every student accountable
for the same material. This is unfair to our children. The
fact is all students have their own unique way of interpreting the material
we present them in the classroom. In class, especially Language Arts
class, the way in which they process this information is expressed through
the work that they give to us. As an educator, I feel it would be
very boring and repetitive to grade a set of students’ papers only to find
that every student responded exactly the same way. Standardized testing
should not even be allowed in a language arts class. There is no
way of evaluating a student’s performance using standardized test in language
arts classes. Language arts is about expression. We teach writing
and how to interpret various pieces of literature. You cannot standardize
expression.
Just as I said you
cannot standardize expression and individualism, you cannot standardize
creativity. When we ask our students to complete an assignment, we
expect them to be as creative as possible to produce the most effective
work. Reading and writing assignments foster creativity in students
that will not and cannot be fully recognized by administering performance
testing. Performance testing evaluates each student’s ability to
interpret and understand information. There is no way to evaluate
a student’s interpretation of material using a standardized scoring system.
Using standardized scoring will only discourage our children because if
they don't respond within the limits of the standardized scoring system,
then their answers will be considered wrong and we will have contributed
to killing the creative mind of a child.
Educators and education
professionals have identified numerous different learning styles.
We generally categorize each student with one or more learning style.
The style of learning differs from student to student, and therefore so
should the curriculum. Standardized testing does not effectively
incorporate the different learning styles into its evaluation of students’
responses.
Many would argue that
performance testing does take into consideration that requiring all students
to perform at the same level hurts some and restricts others. Some
would disagree. Those who disagree would say that performance test
designers use information and feedback from educators around the world
and collect data from thousands of students. They would then say
that the resulting test is a collection of this feedback and data and therefore
includes all students, regardless of their learning style. According
to the Center for Education Reform Web site, these tests help identify
weaknesses and forge effective strategies to help children learn
(http://www.edreform.com/pubs/testing.htm).
Alfie Kohn, writer
for Education Week on the Web (http://www.edweek.org),
said that standardized testing is so bad now that it "has swelled and mutated,
like a creature in one of those old horror movies, to the point that it
now threatens to swallow our schools whole." She said
that our children are tested more than in any part of the world, in fact
few countries use standardized testing for children below high school level
or multiple-choice tests for children of any age.
It is a known fact
throughout the history of education in America that the areas with the
least amount of resources produce children with the lowest test scores
and the lowest graduation rates. Using standardized curriculum and
standardized testing only adds to the frustration of those children who
have less, thus adding to the dropout rate and the lowest test scores.
Kohn's article points out that in a 1992 National Assessment of Educational
Progress study of math test results, a combination of the following four
factors accounted for 89 percent of the differences in test scores from
state to state: number of parent's living at home, parents' educational
background, type of community and poverty rate. Those who have more
resources fair better than others because they can afford to pay for extensive
test preparation in order to do well on their exams.
The problem of standardized
testing will be one that goes on forever, until educators, law makers and
parents can come to a consensus. Teachers can combat this problem
in the classroom by assigning tasks that foster creativity and individualism
in each of their students. One such assignment is the senior project
that many schools across the nation now require in order to graduate.
Seniors get to embark on a yearlong project, with a topic they choose,
and the finished product can be anything they desire. An assignment
such as this is the perfect way for each student to express his or her
creativity. They get to choose what it is they are most interested
in and share this with others.
As I said before,
until everyone can reach a consensus about the future of educating our
children, we will have to work hard to ensure they are not 'swallowed'
up by that mutated creature called standardized testing.