When a Daughter Stops Dancing With Daddy: Dirty Dancing
Sarah Smith and Lindsay Pichaske
Father-daughter relationship struggles usually seem too difficult for the subject matter of most movies. Yet even Dirty Dancing, which critics usually consider a shallow, cliché love story (Jahiel, 1988, p.1; Ebert, 1987, p. 1; Cunneff, 1987, p.8), depicts this much deeper sociology issue well. Critics overlook the complexities of father-daughter relationships and the changes that the main character, Francis Houseman, undergoes as she progresses from the father-worship stage, through the rebellion-stage, and finally to the independence stage. The movie reveals that fathers close to their daughters have difficulty allowing their daughters to mature. Although Francis’ relationship with her father seems to deteriorate as she grows independent, it actually evolves into a deeper, more sophisticated level, as Francis grows out of the father-adoration stage and forms her own identity separate from her father.
![]()
Before the Houseman’s 1963 summer vacation, 17 year old Francis and her father seem inseparable, for she embodies the typical characteristics of the father-worship stage and thus considers her father a hero. This stage in the relationship appears first in the father-daughter relationship of favored children. Up until this summer, her father, Jake, favors her over her other sister, Lisa, because Frnacis shares his views and models her opinions and behaviors after his. She worships him as a flawless hero because he represents the father archetype, or the stereotypical positive qualities a father possesses (Murdock, 1994, p. 71). She even states that she "thought [she] would never find a man as great as [her] father." Because she holds his views in such high regard, Francis models her behaviors and opinions after her father’s ideology (Murdock, pp.71-95; Fields, 1983, pp. 5-8). Since he encourages equality, she strives to make the world fair for each person. Hence, Francis’s father finds pride in Francis and her determination, affirming that "someday our Baby’s going to change the world." Furthermore, he spoils her, at one point giving her $250 without questioning the money’s use. Similarly, at the summer’s start, Francis obeys her father’s wishes without question, for she adores him and will do anything to please him; typical characteristics of the father-adoration stage. Although his wishes go against her will, she fulfills his request that she should help Neil, a rich Cornell student, with a magic show.![]()
Francis’ father-daughter relationship may also stem from the lack of a strong mother influence. Francis’ mother, Marjorie, embodies the passive housewife stereotype of 1960s mothers. Because she hardly ever contributes meaningful insights to family conversations and problems, Francis views her as weak and dismisses her as a role model. Colman and Colman (1988) affirm that "daughters…feel compelled to grow up imitating their fathers, especially if they feel their mothers to be incompetent" (p. 87). Additionally, Marjories’s dullness may also cause the weak relationship she and Jake share. Their weak relationship thereby contributes to Jake’s favoritism of his daughter, for fathers who favor their daughters typically lack satisfying spousal relationships and create intimate father-daughter relationships to fulfill this emptiness (Murdock, pp. 72 & 176).Jake encounters emotional difficulty letting his daugher grow up and separate from him. Green attributes this difficulty to the fact that, "many fathers…get stuck in the ‘Daddy’s Little Girl’ syndrome, never able to adjust themselves to the scales of change" (p. 23). Because Jake considers Francis his "little girl," he always wants to oversee the decisions she makes, such as with whom she associates. However, because he disapproves of her associations with Johnny, a poor dancer, Jake avoids his daughter and the two essentially cease communication. Disapproval and jealousy appear when he gives her dirty, reprimanding looks rather than reassuring, positive looks. Murdock and Colman and Colman state that Jake's emotional stress also comes from the fact that when fathers and daughters separate, he loses his title as the flawless hero, for the daughter leaves the father-worship stage. As evidenced by his cruel treatment of Francis after she sees his overbearing qualities, Jake dislikes relinquishing this title.
Because of Francis' extreme admiration of Jake, she likewise has psychological difficulty leaving the father-worship stage and claiming her independence. According to Murdock, a daughter's "attachment to the father is so deep and the fear of losing him is so great that [father and daughter] cannot imagine any change in the relationship" (p. 171). Francis displays this fear of parting from Jake when she cries in front of him after somewhat leaving his giudance, claiming that she never wanted the relationship to change. Murdock and Colman & Colman additionally attribute the daughter's difficulty with separtaion to the fact that when they separate, he no longer views her as ‘Daddy’s Little Girl’ and she fears losing this title (pp. 174-175; pp. 88-90). Although she admires him and has difficulty separating from him, Francis, like moist daughters, must separate from her father to obtain her own identity (Murdock, p. 171; Pittman, 1994, p.1).
When Francis leaves the father-adoration stage and enters the rebellious stage, she develops her own judgement and abandons her father’s expectations. Murdock states, "[that] in most cases the daughter is the agent of change" and she achieves this separation through rebellion (p.172). Francis' rebellion primarily manifests itself in loving Johnny, a poor and uneducated dance instructor. Her father deems their relationship unacceptable because he believes that Johnny impregnated his dance partner and considers him a "sleazy" lower class citizen. Francis exhibits the typical method daughters use to break away from their fathers: choosing a mate whomher father distains (Colman & Colman, p. 91). Furthermore, like most fathers who "become threatened as their favorite daughters develop attachments to…other men," he views Johnny as a competitor, trying to detract Francis’ attention (Murdock, p.176). He thinks that because she dates him, she no longer deems their relationship special (p.176). Jake’s jealousy grows apparent when, upon saving Johnny’s dance partner’s life after her illegal abortion, Jake ignores Johnny and gives him hateful glances. Thus Francis keeps their involvement a secret and thereby grows estranged from her father, no longer sharing his views.
![]()
Besides her involvement with Johnny, Francis commits other insubordinate acts while in the rebellious stage to initiate the separation process. Her rebellious deception initiates the father-daughter separation process, because the daughter typically initiates the detachment process (Murdock, p. 175). Specifically, Francis breaks the resort rules when she befriends the lower class staff, also known as the "Dirty Dancers." She furtively attends several staff parties wearing skimpy outfits and dances provocatively as Johnny’s partner to Rock & Roll rather than attending organized dances wearing evening gowns and dancing the foxtrot to classical music. Francis even tells her parents that she has a headache, but then she goes out dancing at another resort.This movement away from her father’s guidance, between the rebellion and independence stages, makes Jake no longer consider Francis the favorite daughter and he claims not to know her anymore. When Jake discovers that Francis has befriended the "Dirty Dancers," he forbids her to see them. This reprimand occurs after he discovers that his money paid for an abortion. Another problematic confrontation occurs when Francis tells her father that she and Johnny sleep together, thereby agitating Jake so extremely that he refuses to speak to her. These situations occur because of the emotional difficulty fathers have when their daughters grow up no longer worship them as gods.
During the independence stage, Francis no longer views Jake as a god and breaks away from him after realizing his imperfection. Colman and Colman claim that "once the…father is no longer seen as god, all the smoldering negative feelings which have been subservient to the heroic imagery burst forth upon the now fallible man" (pp.88-89). When Francis realizes that her father, or role model, has faults, such as prejudice against the lower class, she no longer worships him, therefore breaking away and finding independence (Colman & Colman, pp.88-89). Francis recognizes her father’s mistake of misjudging Johnny simply because of his lower class status. Recognizing her father’s weaknesses shatters his flawless hero image he once had and she no longer strives to mirror his actions, but instead feels comfortable manifesting her own personality and dreams (Murdock, p. 174-203).[click here to view this scene].
In the final reconcilliation stage, Francis and her father reconcile, for Jake accepts that his favorite daughter has grown up a proud woman (Fields, pp.21-23). After seeing that Johnny has redeeming qualities, Jake realizes that his daughter has trustworthy character judgement. Furthermore, he realizes his mistake for prejudging and stereotyping Johnny. These new insights force Jake to apologize to Francis, and although their relationship has changed in that she no longer worships him as a hero, the two have found a new, deeper love for each other. They now mutually respect each other as adults, for Jake views her as a woman, no longer calling her "Baby," and he also hugs her after she and Johnny dance and thereby shows his respect for her decisions. Thus, although it seems that as daughters grow up, they grow apart from their fathers, the relarionship actually evolves and grows stronger, for father and daughter love and respect each other as adults. Thus, Fields considers this relationship change a vital part of both the father’s and the daughter’s happiness (pp.39-49). Furthermore, this change remains crucial to a favored daughter, because if she does not break away from her father, she will have a dependence that will remain indefinitely (Murdock, p. 174-200).[click here to view this scene].
Dirty Dancing shows that fathers have a major effect on a girl’s development. A father’s guidance determines the woman that his daughter will mature into as she reaches adulthood. Although the hardships of growing up and abandoning the father’s care and favoritism seem to destroy strong father-daughter relationships, they actually deepen and strengthen them. Thus, Dirty Dancing accurately portrays this drastic relationship change and the struggles accompanying the coming of age, thereby increasing its credibility as more than just a shallow love story.
Annotated ReferencesCannold, M. and Reuther, S. (1987). Dirty Dancing. Patrick Swayze, Jennifer Grey, and Jerry Orbach. Vestron Pictures.
Colman, A., & Colman, L. (1988). Coming of age: alienation and ambivalence. In The father: mythology and changing roles (pp.85-91). Wilmette, IL:Chiron Publications.
Colman and Colman inform readers of the changes father-child relationships undergo when a child grows up. As young adults compare their fathers to other men, they dispel the image of their fathers as flawless heroes and recognize their faults. Because teens want to forget or dismiss their role models’ faults, they break away from their normal family roles and develop new responsibilities apart from the family. Most teens view their fathers as their connection to the outside world, despite these faults, and thus aspire to imitate them. Young adults who negatively react to the discovery that their fathers have flaws, however, dismiss fathers as their role models and show anger and pity towards them. Daughters typically do not react negatively to realizing that their fathers have faults. They still wish to follow in their fathers’ footsteps, particularly if they do not identify well with their mothers or view them as weak. However, as an act of independence and rebellion, daughters commonly pair up with men whom their fathers dislike.
Cunneff, T. (1987, August 31). Dirty dancing [Review of the movie Dirty Dancing] People Weekly, p. 8.Cunneff summarizes the movie’s captivating dance scenes and its cliché plot. He hails the two main actors, Patrick Swazee and Jennifer Grey, as talented dancers and actors. Despite their talent, however, Cunneff claims that the movie’s script proves too predictable and thus only partially portrays the teens’ carefree attitude the summer before the Kennedy assassination and Vietnam. These cliches include Penny’s unrealistic abortion and the exaggerated and almost ridiculous class distinctions between the summer staff and the vacationers. Cunneff also mentions the father-daughter turmoil that results when Baby falls in love with the lower class dance instructor, Johnny. He briefly describes her difficulties with growing up and leaving her father’s supervision.Dad and daughter- a special bond. (1993, January). USA Today Magazine, p. 6.This article explains that father-daughter relationships prove as important as mother-daughter relationships. As father-daughter studies conducted by Pamela Sarigiani of Purdue University suggest, fathers greatly affect their daughters’ mental well-being. Sarigiani supports the author, affirming that adolescent girls who lack positive father influence prove more depressed than those having a positive father influence. Furthermore, studies involving mother-son, mother-daughter, and father-son relationships did not show the same results. Because fathers greatly affect their daughters’ confidence, they must maintain strong father-daughter relationships during adolescence, when fathers typically pull away from their daughters. Teenage daughters need support because their developing bodies make them insecure. Towards adolescence’s end, however, fathers must give their daughters freedom, rather than keep them under their constant guidance and support. Thus, at adolescence’s conclusion, the daughter receives positive father influence, while showing confidence and independence.
Ebert, R. (1987, August 21). Dirty Dancing. [Review of the movie Dirty Dancing].Chicago Sun-Times [Online].Ebert makes it blatantly obvious he does not like Dirty Dancing. Throughout the review, Ebert places poignant statements that tell the reader not to waste the time or money to see this overused plot about love between young people of different backgrounds. He also points out that Johnny Castle, although not interested in Baby at first, finally falls in love with Baby. Ebert also notices that the staff-members, who can dance well, are obviously not just kids who dance for fun. Ebert makes it clear that he feels that the plot seems unbelievably predictable and that the movie has no point. Ebert also admits that the movie has Jewish undertones. Ebert still feels that this movie makes no effort to touch on any of the topics it dares to touch, such as Semitism, teenage sexuality, and classicism.
Fields, S. (1983). Like Father, Like Daughter: How Father Shapes the Woman His Daughter Becomes (pp.3-30). Boston: Little, Brown. Chapter One.Fields discusses in chapter one the unique relationship between fathers and daughters. This relationship proves crucial to the daughter’s development as an independent and stable human being. If the relationship develops along proper cultural and moral lines, then a caring and innocent relationship will develop that encourages self-esteem and independence. However, the relationship has tendencies to follow a perverse line, such as molestation, incest, physical abuse, and psychological abuse. Regardless, a sweet and sour bond remains that clearly shapes the woman that "Daddy’s Little Girl" matures into. This relationship may change in the future, but it still has a very viable place in human development. It remains a part of the family that helps shape the next generation and how the children grow up. The ideals a father represents, such as safety, security, love, and the embodiment of the perfect man will have the most profound effect on each little girl and the woman develops into.Fields, S. (1983). Chapter two. Like Father, Like Daughter: How Father Shapes the Woman His Daughter Becomes (pp.34-49). Boston: Little, Brown.Fields discusses the father’s role as his little girl’s protector. This basic fatherly concept instills in the daughter a trust in her father and in her own person. However, the adverse effects of an overprotective father can reach farther than possibly imagined. An overprotective father inhibits a girl’s ability to eventually gain independence. If the overprotective father provides his child with too much, this leaves the daughter with mistrust in her own ability to provide for herself. Still there some fathers who do not associate with their children, which has a profound effect on a young girl’s trust issues. Causing more problems than possibly realized, the absentee father can leave the ‘abandoned’ daughter feeling vulnerable. Whether the father actively participates in his daughter’s life or not, the effect his overprotection can have, or lack thereof, alters the daughter’s personality and mental health.
Green, M. (1976). Goodbye father (pp.29-45). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Chapter three.Green discusses how the role of men in the family unit has declined. To prove this Green uses examples from the basic male behaviors of primates, the Trobriand Islanders, the Bible, Ancient Rome, Jamaica, and modern Western culture. These examples discuss how close the bond is between mother and child and exclude the father. To develop bonds with his children, the father started to provide meat and food for the woman and child, thus giving him an integral part in his children’s lives. Once man understood that he was the cause of impregnating his sexual partner, he started to exploit through their sheer brute strength by oppressing women. This oppression has gone on for many thousands of years until recently, when women began to find equality with men. Green claims that the emancipation of women has led to the father’s decline as an important family member. Since women no longer needed the man as protector, his effect on the family has declined immensely.
Green, M. (1976). Goodbye father (pp. 72-82). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Chapter five.Green discusses the parameters of father-daughter relationships in modern society. Green notes that because the father role has declined, women have grown more vocal about their rights and feminism issues. Green still feels that fathers find it hard to think of their daughters as capable of accomplishing anything. Fathers want their daughters to dress up and play with dolls and leave the tree climbing and wrestling to the boys. When a father instills in his daughter these traits of ‘femininity’ and incapacity, he prepares her for her role as a member of ‘The Cult of Domesticity,’ meaning that she will grow up to be nothing more than a housewife and mother. Still the relationship between father and daughter has deeper implications. A girl’s father links her to the mysterious world of men. How the father acts, how much time he spends with her, his overall personality, and the amount of affection he gives her all determine what kind of mate she will seek in adulthood. This may prove the only affect men may have in the family, to teach the daughter man’s nature and to keep the sons disciplined, thus affirming Green’s hypothesis that men are becoming increasingly unimportant and women only stronger.
Heilbrun, A. B. Jr. (1984). Identification with the father and peer intimacy of the daughter. Family Relations, 33, 597-605.Heilbrun describes two studies he conducted that detail the sociological effects of strong father-daughter relationships. He conducted his first study to test his hypothesis that girls who preferred and understood their fathers over their mothers had more masculine than feminine qualities, had homosexual tendencies, and had difficulty relating to their peers. The 177 undergraduate white female subjects’ personality questionnaires and adjective checklists describing them selves supported this hypothesis. These results led Heilbrun to question the personality effects of different types of father-identifying daughters. He classified 44 undergraduate women into two categories, those who mimicked their fathers’ behavior, and those who merely lived vicariously through their father’s experiences. Heilbrun then gave these subjects personality questionares to test his hypothesis that women who modeled their behaviors directly after their fathers’ would exhibit masculine and homosexual tendencies and would have difficulty relating to their peers. His findings supported his predictions about masculinity and homosexuality, but showed no peer relation difference. Future research would consider the quality of the father-daughter relationships.
Jahiel, E. (1987, January 22). Dirty Dancing [Review of the movie Dirty Dancing]. Movie Reviews by Edwin Jahiel [Online].Jahiel’s movie review about Dirty Dancing basically summarizes the movie’s plot while making sure he tells all he likes it. Jahiel sheds a positive light on the movie as he relates the story of a girl nicknamed Baby and how she grows up one fateful summer at a family resort. He also details the plot and points out some facts that remained unclear, such that it took place in the Catskills. Jahiel also expounds upon the Jewish undertones in the movie, noticing that a sequence in the movie announces that a Rabbi Sherman will lecture on the psychology of insult comedians. Jahiel also points out the hair and dress does not coordinate with the 1963 time setting. He claims the only real reference to the1960s was the film’s exceptionally clean language that contrasts with most other 1980s ‘coming of age’ films.Murdock, M. (1994). Father as hero/ daughter as destiny. In The hero’s daughter (pp. 71-95). New York: Fawcett Columbine.Murdock describes several psychological reasons why daughters imitate and idolize their fathers. She reports that the father’s "archetype," or the redeeming qualities all fathers stereotypically possess causes this admiration. By latching onto their fathers’ strength, power, and dedication, daughters ignore their fathers’ true personalities so they can have flawless role models who they strive to impress. Murdock’s first father-imitating method involves daughters viewing their fathers as flawless heroes, while overlooking their realistic qualities. These girls often encounter disappointment, for they unhealthily assume that their fathers can accomplish the impossible, and through imitation, they too can accomplish the impossible. The second method entails fathers supporting their daughters’ decisions, while at the same time directing the daughters to follow their footsteps, and thereby building the girls’ confidence. This same method, however, has negative effects, for some men encourage their daughters to follow their footsteps so the fathers can live vicariously through their daughters. These fathers desire their daughters to accomplish their own unfulfilled dreams rather than supporting their daughters’ own dreams. Murdock finally mentions that daughters must abandon their father’s image to live independently.
Murdock, M. (1994). No longer my father’s daughter. In The hero’s daughter (pp. 171-207). New York: Fawcett Columbine.Murdock informs readers that father-daughter separation proves vital. If daughters remain under their fathers’ support, they will lead unhealthy and dependent lives. Father or daughter rejection or rebellion usually triggers this detachment. Typically, the daughter initiates the alteration. Many factors cause this drastic relationship change. Primarily, when the two separate, they dispel each other’s flawless images and expose their weaknesses. Furthermore, when a girl claims her independence, she gives up her title as daddy’s favorite, for she abandons his approval and advice. Fathers likewise have difficulty giving up their hero titles, for they lose control over their daughters’ lives. Typically, fathers who favor their daughters have weak spousal relationships, thereby making the father-daughter separation process even more arduous. Other important relationships or commitments their daughters have make them jealous, and they thus may act ornery or controlling. Fathers who cannot deal with their daughters’ independence, otherwise known as "reactionary father[s]," view this independence as rebellion and discourage their daughters’ separation. Not supporting the daughters’ opinions can also prove beneficial, however, for it encourages girls to form independent views.
Pittman, F. (1994). How to manage mom and dad. Psychology Today, 27 (6) p44-47.Pittman explains the relationships that adults can have with the older generation. He discusses the way in which people should move on and live a life without their parents. Eligibility as an independent adult includes the capability to admit one’s mistakes, to give up any lingering sense that parents remain almighty and infallible, and finally that the child forgives parents for not raising the child just right. Pittman encourages that the grown child should ask the parent why their parents raised them as they did. Pittman expresses that all children should come to terms with the type of parents that they had, be it alcoholics, criminals, lunatics, Joan Cleavers, or children themselves. Once at peace with this fact, many realize that if it were not for the type of parents they had, they would not have developed into the person they are today.
Rhodes, S. Dirty Dancing [Review of the movie Dirty Dancing] (1987) [Online].Rhodes summarizes and criticizes the film, considering it enjoyable but cliché. While the choreography captures the audiences’ attention, the script proves dull and predictable. He dwells on the dancing scenes, particularly ones showing Patrick Swazee and his partner, Cynthia Rhodes, for these prove the most intense and likeable scenes. The cast, excluding Baby, Jennifer Grey and her father, Jerry Orbach, prove better dancers than actors and do little to spice up their ordinary lines. The plot proves as predictable as the script. Rhodes critiques the unrealistic and stereotypic situations when Penny undergoes an illegal abortion, Baby rescues her, and falls in love with Johnny. His primary complaint however lies with Patrick Swazee’s character, Johnny, who incessantly whines about his lower class placement, yet takes no action to change it. Finally, he insightfully notices the filming focus on Baby’s shoes. Her clean and seemingly untouched sneakers undermine her naivete and innocence.
Created for educational purposes only.