|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To confirm the first two rows and extend them infinitely to the right, note that K2 is the only connected (equivalently, finite diameter) 1-regular graph and that cycles are the only connected 2-regular graphs.
To check that the first column is correct, note that the diameter-1 graphs are exactly the complete graphs (by definition) and that both K5 and K6 are nonplanar.
The upper bounds for (5,3) and (5,7) come from the following paper:
M. Fellows, P. Hell, and K. Seyffarth. Large planar graphs with given diameter and maximum degree. Disc. Appl. Math. 61 (1995), 133-153. MR 96e:05081.
The lower bound for (5,4) comes from a graph constructed by James Preen using a genetic algorithm. Preen also constructed the (4,4) graph.
Most of the previously best-known lower bounds and a proof of the non-existence of (5,2) can be found in the following paper:
F. Göbel and W. Kern. Planar regular graphs with prescribed diameter. Univ. of Twente (The Netherlands) Applied Math. Memorandum No. 1183, December 1993.
The lower bounds for (3,D), D ≥ 6; (4,D), D ≥ 5; and (5,D), D ≥ 5 arise from improving the constructions of Göbel and Kern.
The lower bound for (4,D), D even and ≥ 4, given without proof in Proposition 3.2(c) in the Göbel/Kern paper, should be 8*3D/2-1-2. Also, the lower bound for (4,D), D odd and ≥ 5, should be 4*3(D-1)/2-2. These corrections have been verified by Frits Göbel, but Erich Friedman and I have improved the bounds, as reflected in the table.
Friedman and I are working on a paper together detailing the many recent improvements. For pictures of the largest-known regular graphs, see Friedman's slightly smaller table.
The second table gives the best-known upper bounds for the number of vertices in a planar (but not necessarily regular) graph with maximum degree Δ and diameter D. The newest bounds (due to Friedman and me) are in bold. Bounds known to be optimal are marked with an asterisk.
The third table gives the best-known lower bounds for the number of vertices in a planar (but not necessarily regular) graph with maximum degree Δ and diameter D. Almost all of these bounds are due to Fellows, Hell, and Seyffarth. The lower bounds for (3,6) and (5,4) come from graphs constructed by Geoff Exoo using simulated annealing and tabu search. The lower bounds for Δ = 4 agree with those for regular graphs. Again, bounds known to be optimal are marked with an asterisk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Links to this page.
Please send any updates or corrections to: rpratt@email.unc.edu
Return to my home page.