Ventilation (ARDS/ventilators)

Ravindra Prasad, M.D.,  March 29, 1996

 

ARDS - diffuse (homogenous) lung injury vs. heterogeneous, with areas of relatively unaffected lung

         CT: marked heterogeneity in first 10 days, areas of nl V/Q ratio using inert gas studies, compliance on lung corrected for aerated lung volume comparable to normal

         “the functioning lung in ARDS is not so much stiff as it is small”

         ventilation with “normal” volumes => inc. pressure

 

Barotrauma

Increased by:

    • peak airway pressures > 40-50 cm H20 (although injury can be prevented if excessive inflation is limited; rats with chests strapped were OK ... “volutrauma”)

    •peak alveolar pressures > 35-40 cm H20

    •high mean pressure

    •duration of ventilation

    •etc.

Consequences:

Extra-alveolar gas:  pneumothorax, subQ emphysema, subpleural air cysts, pneumomediastinum, pneumoperitoneum

Systemic gas embolism (if infiltrates block decompression of gas in bronchovascular sheath, and if vascular structures disrupted by necrosis)

Diffuse lung injury: indistinguishable from ARDS

 

Mechanical Ventilation

Volume-controlled (machine triggered) and volume-assisted (patient triggered)

   flow limited (predetermined magnitude and pattern, eg sine, square, decelerating)

   pressure is the dependent variable

   used if peak airway pressures are of minor concern

   ventilation guarantee

   volume-controlled ventilation (VCV), volume-assist control ventilation (VACV), IMV, SIMV


Pressure-limited

   flow and volume are the dependent variables

   ventilator creates square wave of pressure

   flow pattern tends to be decelerating

2 types of breaths:

Pressure-controlled (machine triggered) and pressure-assisted (patient triggered)

   off signal defined by set inspiratory time

   complete control of peak pressure

   good in cases of leakage (eg uncuffed tube, bronchopleural fistulas)

   pressure-control ventilation (PCV), pressure-limited SIMV, pressure-limited IMV

 

Pressure-support

   always patient triggered

   off signal is a decrease in insp flow to a set level below initial insp flow

   pressure support (PS), SIMV/IMV + PS

   decelerating inspiratory flow

   pt determines frequency and insp time

   major concern is peak pressure, not ventilation guarantee

   can be used to wean

 

New modes

Pressure regulated volume control (PRVC)

   decelerating flow pattern, constant pressure

   ventilation guarantee with lowest possible pressures

   can manipulate I:E easily

   pressure support changes with each breath to achieve set goal TV

 

Volume support

   patients with limited breathing capacity, with intact respiratory drive

   advantages of pressure support with a ventilation guarantee (machine gives support if and only if pt unable to reach goal TV)

   support during ventilation, but only as much as pt requires for TV

   can be used to wean

   pt triggers each breath

   pressure is constant, flow is decelerating

   need back-up (PRVC) in case of apnea

 

SIMV (VC) + PS                                    SIMV (PC) + PS


Inverse Ratio Ventilation

   2 types:

    Pressure-controlled or pressure-limited with decelerating insp flow

    volume-cycled with either a square or decelerating wave pattern

   PC-IRV more common

   can increase mean alveolar pressure while keeping PIP <35 cm H2O => airways stented open more effectively than transient application of same peak pressure

   recruits more alveolar units than PEEP or conventional modes of ventilation at any given mean airway pressure

   can result in improved oxygenation at lower minute volume, peak airway pressure, and PEEP requirements.

 

Proportional Assist Ventilation

   not commercially available

   ventilator simply amplifies pt effort (positive feedback) - you set factor of amplification

   pt has control of breathing pattern throughout (triggering and onward) => inc. comfort

   dec. likelihood of overventilation, because pt’s resp control system will downregulate resp if hypocapnia occurs

   requires active central drive

   positive feedback:  potential for “run away”

 

Tracheal gas insufflation

   decreases VD/VT

       under development

 

Airway Pressure Release Ventilation

       CPAP with periodic (sudden) release of valve => gas leaves lungs, ventilating

       maintains FRC

       recruits alveoli using lower peak and mean airway pressures than used with conventional ventilation

       cardiac fnct theoretically impaired to a lesser degree because pressures are lower than conventional modes

       pt can breathe spontaneously

       improves VD/VT

       speculative

 

High-frequency ventilation

 

ARDS

   Goal for O2 sat ~90%

   Use traditional modes (volume-control)

   Add PEEP

   If PIP 40 cm H20, consider pressure-control, PRVC

   Adjust I:E ratio, consider inverse ratio ventilation

   Consider permissive hypercapnia vs. extracorporeal CO2 removal

   (may use support modes in addition if pt has respiratory drive)

 


 

References

 

Apostolakos, MJ et al.  “New Modes of Mechanical Ventilation.”  Clinical Pulmonary Medicine, Vol. 2, No. 2, March 1995, pp. 121-128.

MacIntyre, NR. “Clinically Available New Strategies for Mechanical Ventilatory Support.”  Chest, Vol. 104, No. 2, August 1993, pp. 560-565.

Marcy, TW.  “Barotrauma:  Detection, Recognition, and Management.”  Chest 1993, Vol. 104, No. 2, August 1993, pp. 578-584.

Siemens-Elema AB.  System SV 300. SV 300 Ventilatory modes: How do they work - How are they used? Sweden, September 1994.

Tharratt, RS et al.  “Pressure Controlled Inverse Ratio Ventilation in Severe Adult Respiratory Failure.”  Chest, Vol. 4, No. 4, October 1988, pp. 755-762.