October 30-November 1, 2000
IV. Fair Use (Cont'd)
C. Biography & unpublished worksV. Other exemptions1. HYPO:
X writes biography of Wayne Newton
Y copies some materialY's biography in popular style
X uses photos from concert
Y uses same photos2. Harper & Row, p. 703
3. Unpublished works
a. Salinger, p. 719
b. New Era, p. 719
c. Wright v. Warner Books, 953 F.2d 731 (2d Cir. 1991)
C. Parody
1. Carol Burnett parody -- Sunset Boulevarda. Relevant factors a court would consider2. Form of comment or criticism1. Unlawful appropriationb. History of parody2. How much is used - "Conjure up" test
3. Market effect
4. Public interest
3. First Amendment concern
4. Parody v. satire
5. Cases
a. MGM & MacMillan Co. v. Showcase Atlanta Productions, 479 F. Supp. 351 (N.D. Ga. 1979)
b. Acuff-Rose, p. 458
c. Art parody -- Rodin or Barry Flannagan (at the National Gallery Sculpture Garden)
d. Dr. Seuss Enterprises LP v. Penguin Books, 924 F. Supp. 1559 (S.D. Cal. 1996), aff'd 101
F.3d 1394 (9th Circ. 1997)e. Leibovitz v. Paramount Pictures Corp., 137 F.3d 109 (2d Cir. 1998)
A. Other reproduction right exemptions1. Mechanical licenseB. Educational copying2. Ephemeral recordings
3. Cases
a. News clippings
1. Pacific & Southern, p. 741
2. Los Angeles News Service v. Tullo, 973 F.2d 791 (9th Cir. 1992)
3. Los Angeles Times v. Free Republic, 59 P.T.C.J. 150 (C.D. Cal. 1999)
b. Software
a. Sony Computer Entertainment v. Connectix Corp., 59 P.T.C.J. 570 (9th Cir. 2000)
b. Section 117: software coying for use + back up
1. Marcus v. Rowley, p. 766
2. Classroom guideline, p. 763
3. Coursepack copying
C. Library issues - § 108a. Basic Books v. Kinko's, cited p. 685
b. Princeton University Press v. Michigan Documents
Service, cited p. 7024. Videotaping guidelines
1. Requirements to qualify
2. Preservation and replacement - §§ 108(b)-(c)
3. Single copying for users - §§ 108 (d)-(e)
D. Performance rights exemptions4. Interlibrary loan - § 108(g)(2) and CONTU Guidelines
1. Classroom exemption - § 110(1)
2. Distance learning - § 110(2)
3. Religious services - § 110(3)
4. Nonprofit performances - § 110(4)
5. Agricultural fairs - § 110(6)
6. Secondary transmissions
a. Hotel guest rooms - § 111
b. Small commercial establishments - § 110(5)
HYPO:
Joe's bar & grill -- watching football games
Admission fee
E. Compulsory licenses - Copyright Royalty Tribunal
1. Mechanical fees (records)
2. Juke boxes (now by voluntary agreement)
3. Cable television
4. Public television
5. Satellite retransmission
F. Peformance & display right cases
1. Columbia Pictures Indus. v. Professional Real Estate Investors, cited p. 612
2. On Command Video Corp. v. Columbia Pictures Indus., 777 F. Supp. 787 (N.D. Cal. 1991)
3. Columbia Pictures Indeus. v. Redd Horne Inc., 749 F. Supp. 154 (3d Cir. 1983)
4. Ringgold, p. 749 - Similar cases
5. Institutions
a. Prisons - Diagnostic
Unit Inmate Council v. Motion Picture Association of America Inc.,
953 F.2d 376 (8th Cir. 1992)
b. Nursing homes
c. Daycare centers
d. Telephone music on hold
VI. Moral Rights, Terminations, etc.
A. Moral rights under the VARA
1. HYPO: Calder sculpture
2. VARAB. Terminations and renewalsa. Attribution & integrity - life of the artist only
b. Digital issues
3. Adaptation rights - colorized films
4. Works for hire - § 201(b)
COMPARISON OF §§ 304(c) & 203
| SECTION | GRANTS COVERED | WHO MAY EXERCISE | BEGINNING OF 5-YEAR PERIOD | FURTHER GRANTS |
| § 304(c) | Before 1-1-78 | Author or majority interest of statutory beneficiaries (per stirpes) to extent of that author's share or | End of 56 years of copyright or 1-1-78, whichever is later | Generally tenants in common with right to deal separately, except where dead author's rights are shared, then majority action (per stirpes) as to the author's share |
| By author or other person designated by § 304(a)(1)(C) | In case of grant by others, all surviving grantors | |||
| Of renewal right in statutory copyright | ||||
| § 203 | On or after 1-1-78 | Author or majority of grant authors or majority of their respective beneficiaries, voting as a unit for each author & per stirpes | End of 35 years from grant, or if covering publication right, either 35 years from publoication or 40 years fro grant, whichever is earlier | Requires same number & proportion as required for termination |
| By author | ||||
| Of any right under copyright |
REVERSION BASED ON WHEN WORKS CREATED & TRANSFERRED
| Post 1978 & © transfer | Pre-1978 © & transfer | Pre-1978 ©; Post-1977 transfer | Pre-1978 & not transferred | |
| TERM | Life + 70 | 28+28+39 | 28+28+39 or 28+ 67 | 28+67 |
| WHO | Author | Author or heirs | Author | Author or owner of termination right |
| TERMINATION | After 35th year; if publication betwen 35th & 40th year - § 203 | After year 56 for a 5-year period - § 304(c) | After 35th year; if publication between 35th & 40th year - § 203 | Not exercised before or renewal term has expired, can exercise between 75th & 80th year |
| NOTICE | Between 2-10 years prior to years 35-40 | Between 2-10 years prior to 57th year | Between 2-10 years prior to years 35-40 | Notice between years 75-80 |
VII. Remedies
A. InjunctionsVIII. Major Treatises1. Preliminary
2. Permanent
B. Impoundment & distruction
C. Damages
1. Statutory damages - § 504(c)4. Prejudgment interesta. Registration within three months2. Actual damages & profits - §504(b)b. $750 - $30,000 per act of infringement § 504(c)(1)
1. Reduced to $200 for innocent, raised to $150,000
for willful infringement - § 504(c)(2)2. Remission of damages - § 504(c)(2)
c. Goal: compensate D + deter future infringement
3. Costs & attorneys fees
a. Registration required to recoverb. Fogerty III, 94 F.3d 553 (9th Cir. 1996)
5. Jury trials - Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, 118 S.Ct. 1279 (1998)D. Defenses6. Criminal penalties -- No Electonic Theft Act - § 506
1. Independent creation
2. Fair use
3. Abandonment
4. Equitable defenses: acquiesence, unclean hands, laches, estoppel, etc.
5. Misuse
A. Nimmer on Copyright, 1978 - 10 vols.B. Goldstein on Copyright, 2d ed. 1996 - 4 vols.